Oecologia

, Volume 78, Issue 3, pp 322–329 | Cite as

Inhibition of herbivory on young holly leaves: evidence for the defensive role of saponins

  • Daniel A. Potter
  • Thomas W. Kimmerer
Original Papers

Summary

Response of the southern red mite, Oligonychus ilicis McGregor, to young and one year old leaves of Ilex opaca Aiton was studied on three dates during the period of leaf expansion in the spring. Young foliage, which is rich in nutrients but also contains high levels of saponins, was found to be unsuitable for colonization by this oligophagous herbivore until the leaves had matured and levels of saponins had declined. Mites preferentially colonized and had higher survival and reproduction on sclerophyllous, one-year old leaves than on young leaves in early spring. High levels of saponins in young, second-flush leaves of shoots that had earlier been damaged by frost were again correlated with low mite survival in June. Laboratory preference tests with the fall webworm, Hyphantria cunea Drury, and the eastern tent caterpillar, Malacosoma americanum (F.), indicated that young, saponin-rich holly foliage is especially unpalatable to these highly polyphagous caterpillars. Fifth instar fall webworms required significantly longer to complete their development, attained lower weights, and had greater mortality on artificial diet amended with low concentrations of purified holly saponins than on control diet. These results support the hypothesis that the high levels of saponins in young holly leaves provide protection from herbovores until the leaves have matured and their structural defenses are developed.

Key words

Ilex opaca Allelochemicals Oligonychus ilicis Plant defense 

References

  1. All JN, Benjamin DM (1975) Influence of needle maturity on larval feeding preference and survival of Neodiprion swainei and N. rugifrons on jack pine, Pinus banksiana. Ann Entomol Soc Am 68:579–584Google Scholar
  2. Applebaum SW, Birk Y (1979) Saponins. pp 539–566. In: Rosenthal GA Janzen DH (eds) Herbivores. Their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  3. Applebaum SW, Gestetner B, Birk Y (1956) Physiological aspects of host specificity in the Bruchidae. IV. Developmental incompatibility of soybeans for Callosobruchus. J Insect Physiol 11:611–616Google Scholar
  4. Applebaum SW, Marco S, Birk Y (1969) Saponins as possible factors of resistance of legume seeds to the attack of insects. J Agric Food Chem 17:618–622Google Scholar
  5. Bangham AD, Horne RW (1962) Action of saponins on biological cell membranes. Nature 196:952–953Google Scholar
  6. Basu N, Rastogi RP (1967) Triterpenoid saponins and sapogenins. Phytochemistry 6:1249–1270Google Scholar
  7. Chabot BF, Hicks DJ (1982) The ecology of leaf life spans. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 13:229–259Google Scholar
  8. Coley PD (1983) Herbivory and defensive characteristics of tree species in a lowland tropical forest. Ecol Monogr 53:209–233Google Scholar
  9. Coley PD, Bryant JP, Chapin FS (1985) Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230:895–899Google Scholar
  10. Feeny P (1976) Plant apparency and chemical defense. Rec Adv Phytochem 10:1–40Google Scholar
  11. Grubb PJ (1986) Sclerophylls, pachyphylls and pycnophylls: the nature and significance of hard leaf surfaces. pp 137–150. In: Juniper B, Southwood TRE (eds). Insects and the plant surface. E. Arnold Publ, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Harley KLS, Thorsteinson AJ (1967) The influence of plant chemicals on the feeding behavior, development, and survival of the two-striped grasshopper, Melanoplus bivittatus (Say) Acrididae: Orthoptera. Can J Zool 45:305–319Google Scholar
  13. Hollander M, Wolfe DA (1973) Nonparametric statistical methods. Wiley & Sons, NYGoogle Scholar
  14. Ikeda T, Matsumura F, Benjamin DM (1977) Chemical basis for feeding adaptation of pine sawflies, Neodiprion rugrifrons and Neodiprion swainei. Science 197:497–499Google Scholar
  15. Ishaaya I, Birk Y (1965) Soybean saponins IV. The effect of proteins on the inhibitory activity of soybean saponins on certain enzymes. J Food Sci 30:118–120Google Scholar
  16. Ishaaya I, Birk Y, Bondi A, Tencer Y (1969) Soyabean saponins IX. Studies of their effect on birds, mammals, and cold-blooded organisms. J Sci Food Agric 20:433–436Google Scholar
  17. Johnson WT, HH Lyon (1976) Insects that feed on trees and shrubs. Cornell Univ Press, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  18. Kramer PJ, Kozlowski TT (1979) Physiology of woody plants. Academic Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  19. Kimmerer TW, Potter DA (1987) Nutritional quality of specific leaf tissues and selective feeding by a specialist leafminer. Oecologia 71:548–551Google Scholar
  20. Lindahl IL, Cook AC, Davis RE, Maclay WD (1954) Preliminary investigations on the role of soybean saponins in ruminant bloat. Science 119:157–158Google Scholar
  21. Mague DL, Streu HT (1980) Life history and seasonal population growth of Oligonychus ilicis infesting Japanese holly in New Jersey. Environ Entomol 9:420–424Google Scholar
  22. Matthysse JG, Naegele JA (1950) Mites on woody plants and their control. Proc 26th Natl Shade Tree Conf 26:78–90Google Scholar
  23. Mattson WJ, Jr (1980) Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:119–161Google Scholar
  24. McComb CW (1986) A field guide to insect pests of holly. Holly Soc. Am., Baltimore MDGoogle Scholar
  25. Mooney HA, Gulmon SL (1982) Constraints on leaf structure and function in relation to herbivory. BioScience 32:198–206Google Scholar
  26. Mooney HA, Williams KS, Lincoln DE, Ehrlich RR (1981) Temporal and spatial variability in the interaction between the checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas chalcedona and its principal food source, the California shrub, Diplacus aurantiacus. Oecologia 50:195–198Google Scholar
  27. Onuf CP (1978) Nutritive value as a factor in plant-insect interactions with emphasis on field studies. pp 85–96. In: Montgomery GG (ed). The ecology of arboreal folivores. Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  28. Potter DA, Kimmerer TW (1986) Seasonal allocation of defense investment in Ilex opaca Aiton and constraints on a specialist leafminer. Oecologia 69:217–224Google Scholar
  29. Potter DA, Kimmerer TW (1988) Do holly leaf spines really deter herbivory? Oecologia 75:216–221Google Scholar
  30. Raupp MJ, Denno RF (1983) Leaf age as a predictor of herbivore distribution and abundance. pp 91–124. In: Denno RJ, McClure MS (eds) Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed systems. Academic Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  31. Rhoades DF, Cates RG (1976) Towards a general theory of plant antiherbivore chemistry. Rec Adv Phytochem 10:168–213Google Scholar
  32. SAS Institute (1982) General linear models procedure, pp 139–179. In: Statistical analysis system user's guide: statistics. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  33. Scriber JM, Slansky F (1981) The nutritional ecology of immature insects. Annu Rev Entomol 26:183–211Google Scholar
  34. Stehr WC, Cook EF (1968) A revision of the genus Malacosoma Huber in North America (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae): Systematics, biology, immatures, and parasites. US Natl Mus Bull 276, 321 ppGoogle Scholar
  35. Streu HT, Vasvary LM (1970) Pests of holly in the eastern United States. In: Hansell E (ed). Handbook of hollies. J Am Soc Hortic Soc 49:234–243Google Scholar
  36. Sutherland ORW, Hood ND, Hillier JR (1975) Lucerne root saponins a feeding deterrent for the grass grub, Costelytra zealandica (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). NZ J Zool 2:93–100Google Scholar
  37. West LG, McLauglin JL, Eisenbeiss GK (1977) Saponins and triterpens from Ilex opaca. Phytochemistry 16:1846–1847Google Scholar
  38. White TCR (1984) The abundance of invertebrate herbivores in relation to the availability of nitrogen in stressed food plants. Oecologia 63:90–105Google Scholar
  39. Yearian WG, Gilbert KL, Warren LO (1966) Rearing the fall webworm Hyphantria cunea Dr. (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) on a wheat germ medium. J Kans Entomol Soc 39:495–499Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel A. Potter
    • 1
  • Thomas W. Kimmerer
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Entomology and ForestryUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations