, Volume 72, Issue 4, pp 618–623 | Cite as

Role of flower and pollen aromas in host-plant recognition by solitary bees

  • H. E. M. Dobson
Original Papers


The means by which newly emerged pollen-specific (oligolectic) solitary bees locate their appropriate pollen host plant is not clearly understood. To evaluate the role of flower and pollen odors in this recognition process, preference tests were performed on foraging-inexperienced and, for comparison, field-experienced individuals of the solitary bee Colletes fulgidus longiplumosus. The bees were presented with a choice of four plant species, offered in the form of aromas from flowers, whole pollen, pollenkitt, and internal pollen lipids. Observed feeding-attempt response patterns suggest: 1) that bees can distinguish between plant species on the basis of odors from flowers, whole pollen, and pollenkitt, 2) inexperienced bees show a preference for the pollen on which they were reared as larvae, and 3) chemicals eliciting feeding responses to pollen appear to be contained in the pollenkitt. Feeding responses by experienced bees differ from those of inexperienced bees in ways which indicate that the insects' odor-based search image of the host plant becomes modified by foraging experience.

Key words

Pollenkitt Flower-specificity Colletes Bees Semiochemicals 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aufsess A von (1960) Geruchliche Nahorientierung der Biene bei entomophilen und ornithophilen Blüten. Z Vergl Physiol 43:469–498Google Scholar
  2. Bitterman ME, Menzel R, Fietz A, Schafer S (1983) Classical conditioning of proboscis extension in honeybees (Apis mellifera). J Comp Psychol 97:107–119Google Scholar
  3. Boch R (1982) Relative attractiveness of different pollens to honeybees when foraging in a flight room and when fed in the hive. J Apic Res 21:104–106Google Scholar
  4. Boelter AM, Wilson WT (1984) Attempts to condition the pollen preference of honey bees. Amer Bee J 124:609–610Google Scholar
  5. Bolwig N (1954) The role of scent as a nectar guide for honeybees on flowers and an observation on the effect of colour on recruits. Br J Anim Behav 2:81–83Google Scholar
  6. Cameron SA (1981) Chemical signals in bumble bee foraging. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:257–260Google Scholar
  7. cane JH (1983) Olfactory evaluation of Andrena host nest suitability by kleptoparasitic Nomada bees. Anim Behav 31:138–144Google Scholar
  8. Cazier MA, Linsley EG (1974) Foraging behavior of some bees and wasps at Kallstroemia grandiflora flowers in Southern Arizona and New Mexico. Amer Mus Nov No 2546Google Scholar
  9. Corbet SA (1985) Insect chemosensory responses: a chemical legacy hypothesis. Ecol Entomol 10:143–153Google Scholar
  10. Cruden RW (1972) Pollination biology of Nemophila menziesii (Hydrophyllaceae) with comments on the evolution of oligolectic bees. Evolution 26:373–389Google Scholar
  11. Dobson HEM (1980) Interactions of bees and shrubs in the California chaparral community. MS Thesis, Univ Calif Davis, CAGoogle Scholar
  12. Dobson HEM (1985) Pollen and pollen-coat lipids: chemical survey and role in pollen selection by solitary bees. PhD Dissertation, Univ Calif Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  13. Dobson HEM (in press) Survey of pollen and pollenkitt lipids: chemical cues to flower visitors? Amer J BotGoogle Scholar
  14. Dobson HEM (in press) Possible roles of pollenkitt in flower selection by bees: an overview. In: Buchmann SL (ed) Experimental Studies on Pollination and Pollinator Foraging Efficiency. Univ Arizona Press, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  15. Dobson HEM, Bergström J, Bergström G, Groth I (in press) Comparison of pollen and flower volatiles in two Rosa species. PhytochemistryGoogle Scholar
  16. Doull KM (1966) The relative attractiveness to pollen-collecting honeybees of some different pollens. J Apic Res 5:9–14Google Scholar
  17. Doull KM, Standifer LN (1970) Feeding responses of honeybees in the hive. J Apic Res 9:129–132Google Scholar
  18. Faegri K, van der Pijl L (1979) The principles of pollination ecology, 3rd ed. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Frankie GW, Vinson SB (1977) Scent marking of passion flowers in Texas by females of Xylocepa virginica texana (Anthophoridae). J Kansas Entomol Soc 50:613–625Google Scholar
  20. Free JB (1963) The flower constancy of honeybees. J Anim Ecol 32:119–131Google Scholar
  21. Free JB (1970a) The flower constancy of bumblebees. J Anim Ecol 39:395–402Google Scholar
  22. Free JB (1970b) Insect pollination of crops. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Free JB, Williams IH (1983) Scent-marking of flowers by honeybees. J Apic Res 22:86–90Google Scholar
  24. Frisch K von (1923) Über die “Sprache” der Bienen. Zool Jahrb Abt Allg Zool Physiol 40:1–186Google Scholar
  25. Gupta M, Kapil RP (1984) Olfactory response of workers of Apis florea F: to some repellents in semi-field conditions. In: Tasei JN (ed) Proc 5th Int Symp Pollination 1983, INRA, Paris, pp 65–78Google Scholar
  26. Hohmann H (1970) Über die Wirkung von Pollenextrakten und Duftstoffen auf das Sammel- und Werbeverhalten Höselnder Bienen (Apis mellifica L.). Apidologie 1:157–178Google Scholar
  27. Hopkins CY, Jevans AW, Boch R (1969) Occurrence of octadecatrans-2, cis-9, cis-12-trienoic acid in pollen attractive to the honey bee. Can J Biochem 47:433–436Google Scholar
  28. Hügel M-F (1962) Étude de quelques constituents du pollen. Ann Abeille 5:97–133Google Scholar
  29. Hurd PD, Linsley EG (1963) Pollination of the unicorn plant (Martyniaceae) by an oligolectic, corolla-cutting bee. J Kansas Entomol Soc 36:248–252Google Scholar
  30. Hurd PD, LaBerge WE, Linsley EG (1980) Principal sunflower bees of North America with emphasis on the Southwestern United States. Smithson Contr Zool No 310Google Scholar
  31. Klungness LM, Peng Y (1984) a histochemical study of pollen digestion in the alimentary canal of honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). J Insect Physiol 30:511–521Google Scholar
  32. Knoll F (1930) Über Pollenkitt und Bestaubungsart. Z Bot 23:609–675Google Scholar
  33. Koltermann R (1973) Rassen- bzw. artspezifische Duftbewertung bei der Honigbiene und ökologische Adaptation. J Comp Physiol 85:327–360Google Scholar
  34. Kriston I (1973) Die Bewertung von Duft- und Farbsignalen als Orientierungshilfen an der Futterquelle durch Apis mellifera L. J Comp Physiol 84:77–94Google Scholar
  35. Kugler H (1932) Blutenökologische Untersuchungen mit Hummeln. IV. Der Duft als chemischer Nahfaktor bei duftenden und “duftlosen” Blüten. Planta 16:534–553Google Scholar
  36. Lepage M, Boch R (1968) Pollen lipids attractive to honeybees. Lipids 3:530–534Google Scholar
  37. Levin MD, Bohart GE (1955) Selection of pollens by honey bees. Amer Bee J 95:392–393, 402Google Scholar
  38. Lex T (1954) Duftmale an Blüten. Z Vergl Physiol 36:212–234Google Scholar
  39. Linsley EG (1958) The ecology of solitary bees. Hilgardia 27:543–599Google Scholar
  40. Linsley EG (1961) The role of flower specificity in the evolution of solitary bees. Proc 11th Int Congr Entomol 1960, Vienna, vol 1 pp 593–596Google Scholar
  41. Linsley EG (1978) Temporal patterns of flower visitation by solitary bees, with particular reference to the southwestern United States. J Kansas Entomol Soc 51:531–546Google Scholar
  42. Linsley EG, MacSwain JW, Raven PH (1963) Comparative behavior of bees and Onagraceae I. Oenothera bees of the Colorado Desert. Univ California Publ Entomol 33:1–24Google Scholar
  43. Loper GM (1972) Factors affecting the quantity of alfalfa flower aroma and a subsequent influence on honey bee selection. Agron Abstr, pp 15Google Scholar
  44. Loper GM, Berdel RL (1978) Seasonal emanation of ocimene from alfalfa flowers with three irrigation treatments. Crop Sci 18:447–452Google Scholar
  45. Louvenaux J (1959) Recherches sur la récolte du pollen par les abeilles (Apis mellifica L.). Ann Abeille 2:13–111Google Scholar
  46. Manning A (1957) Some evolutionary aspects of the flower constancy of bees. Proc R Phys Soc Edinb 25:67–71Google Scholar
  47. O'Neal RJ, Waller GD (1984) On the pollen harvest by the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) near Tucson, Arizona (1976–1981). Desert Plants 6:81–94, 99–109Google Scholar
  48. Pijl L van der (1960) Ecological aspects of flower evolution I Phyletic evolution. Evolution 14:403–416Google Scholar
  49. Ribbands CR (1955) The scent perception of the honeybee. Proc R Soc Lond 143:367–379Google Scholar
  50. Robacker DC, Flottum PK, Sammataro D, Erickson EH (1983) Effects of climatic and edaphic factors on soybean flowers and on the subsequent attractiveness of the plants to honey bees. Field Crops Res 6:267–278Google Scholar
  51. Schemske DW (1983) Limits to specialization and coevolution in plant-animal mutualisms. In: Nitecki MH (ed) Coevolution. Univ Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 67–109Google Scholar
  52. Schmidt JO (1982) Pollen foraging preferences of honey bees. Southwestern Entomol 7:255–259Google Scholar
  53. Stanley RG, Linskens HF (1974) Pollen. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Stephen WP, Bohart GE, Torchio PF (1969) The biology and external morphology of bees. Agric Expt Sta Oregon State Univ, CorvallisGoogle Scholar
  55. Taber S (1963) Why bees collect pollen. Rep-Abstr 19th Int Beekeeping Congr, Prague 1963, pp 114Google Scholar
  56. Thorp RW (1969) Systematics and ecology of bees of the subgenus Diandrena (Andrenidae). Univ California Publ Entomol 52:1–146Google Scholar
  57. Waller GD, Loper GM, Martin JH (1984) The use of honey bees in production of hybrid cotton seed. In: Tasei JN (ed) Proc 5th Int Symp Pollination, 1983, INRA, Paris, pp 129–133Google Scholar
  58. Williams NH (1983) Floral fragrances as cues in animal behavior. In: Jones EC, Little RJ (eds) Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 50–72Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. E. M. Dobson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations