, Volume 65, Issue 3, pp 356–362 | Cite as

The responses of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapour pressure deficits and soil water content

III. In the sclerophyllous woody species Nerium oleander
  • T. Gollan
  • N. C. Turner
  • E. -D. Schulze
Original Papers


The responses of leaf conductance, leaf water potential and rates of transpiration and net photosynthesis at different vapour pressure deficits ranging from 10 to 30 Pa kPa-1 were followed in the sclerophyllous woody shrub Nerium oleander L. as the extractable soil water content decreased. When the vapour pressure deficit around a plant was kept constant at 25 Pa kPa-1 as the soil water content decreased, the leaf conductance and transpiration rate showed a marked closing response to leaf water potential at-1.1 to-1.2 MPa, whereas when the vapour pressure deficit around the plant was kept constant at 10 Pa kPa-1, leaf conductance decreased almost linearly from-0.4 to-1.1 MPa. Increasing the vapour pressure deficit from 10 to 30 Pa kPa-1 in 5 Pa kPa-1 steps, decreased leaf conductance at all exchangeable soil water contents. Changing the leaf water potential in a single leaf by exposing the remainder of the plant to a high rate of transpiration decreased the water potential of that leaf, but did not influence leaf conductance when the soil water content was high. As the soil water content was decreased, leaf conductances and photosynthetic rates were higher at equal levels of water potential when the decrease in potential was caused by short-term increases in transpiration than when the potential was decreased by soil drying.

As the soil dried and the stomata closed, the rate of photosynthesis decreased with a decrease in the internal carbon dioxide partial pressure, but neither the net photosynthetic rate nor the internal CO2 partial pressure were affected by low water potentials resulting from short-term increases in the rate of transpiration. Leaf conductance, transpiration rate and net photosynthetic rate showed no unique relationship to leaf water potential, but in all experiments the leaf gas exchange decreased when about one half of the extractable soil water had been utilized. We conclude that soil water status rather than leaf water status controls leaf gas exchange in N. oleander.


Water Potential Soil Water Content Leaf Water Transpiration Rate Vapour Pressure Deficit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bates LM, Hall AE (1981) Stomatal closure with soil water depletion not associated with changes in bulk leaf water status. Oecologia (Berlin) 50:62–65Google Scholar
  2. Björkman O, Downton WJS, Mooney HA (1980) Response and adaptation to water stress in Nerium oleander. Carnegie Inst Wash Yearbook 79:150–157Google Scholar
  3. Boyer JS, Knipling EB (1965) Isopiestic technique for measuring leaf water potentials with a thermcouple psychrometer. Proc Nat Acad Sci US 54:1044–1051Google Scholar
  4. Camacho-B SE, Hall AE, Kaufmann MR (1974) Efficiency and regulation of water transport in some woody and herbaceous species. Plant Physiol 54:169–172Google Scholar
  5. Cowan IR (1977) Stomatal behaviour and environment. Adv Bot Res 4:117–228Google Scholar
  6. Denmead OT, Shaw RH (1962) Availability of soil water to plants as affected by soil moisture content and meterological conditions. Agron J 54:385–390Google Scholar
  7. Martin EV (1940) Effect of soil moisture on growth and transpiration in Helianthus annuus. Plant Physiol 15:449–466Google Scholar
  8. Ritchie JT (1974) Atmospheric and soil water influences on the plant water balance. Agric Meteorol 14:183–198Google Scholar
  9. Schulze E-D, Küppers M (1979) Short-term and long-term effects of plant water deficits on stomatal response to humidity in Corylus avellana L. Planta 146:319–326Google Scholar
  10. Seaton KA, Landsberg JJ, Sedgley RH (1977) Transpiration and leaf water potentials of wheat in relation to changing soil water potential. Aust J Agric Res 28:355–367Google Scholar
  11. Thornthwaite CW, Mather JR (1955) The water budget and its use in irrigation. U.S. Dept Agr Yearbook of Agriculture 1955:346–358Google Scholar
  12. Turner NC, Schulze E-D, Golland T (1984a) The responses of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapour pressure deficits and soil water content. I. Species comparisons at high soil water contents. Oecologia (Berlin) 63:338–342Google Scholar
  13. Turner NC, Spurway RA, Schulze E-D (1984b) Comparison of water potentials measured by in situ psychrometry and pressure chamber in morphologically different species. Plant Physiol 74:316–319Google Scholar
  14. Turner NC, Schulze E-D, Gollan T (1985) The responses of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapour pressure deficits and soil water content. II. In the mesophytic herbaceous species Helianthus annuus. Oecologia (Berlin) 65:348–355Google Scholar
  15. Veihmeyer FJ (1956) Soil moisture. In: Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. III. Water Relations of Plants. Springer, Berlin, pp 64–123Google Scholar
  16. Veihmeyer FJ, Hendrickson AH (1950) Soil moisture in relation to plant growth. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 1:285–304Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Gollan
    • 1
  • N. C. Turner
    • 1
    • 2
  • E. -D. Schulze
    • 1
  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für PflanzenökologieUniversität BayreuthBayreuthFederal Republic of Germany
  2. 2.CSIRO Dryland Crops and Soils Research ProgramWembleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations