Abstract
The responses of leaf water potential, leaf conductance, transpiration rate and net photosynthetic rate to vapour pressure deficits varying from 10 to 30 Pa kPa-1 were followed in Helianthus annuus as the extractable soil water decreased. With a vapour pressure deficit of 25 Pa kPa-1 around the entire plant as the soil water content decreased, the leaf conductance and transpiration rate showed a strong closing response to leaf water potential at a value of-0.65 MPa, whereas with a vapour pressure deficit of 10 Pa kPa-1 around the entire plant, the rate of transpiration and leaf conductance decreased almost linearly as the leaf water potential decreased from-0.4 to-1.0 MPa. Increasing the vapour pressure deficit from 10 to 30 Pa kPa-1 in 5 Pa kPa-1 steps decreased the leaf conductance by a similar proportion at all extractable soil water contents. At high soil water contents, the decrease in conductance with leaf water potential was greater when the vapour pressure deficit was increased than when it was not, indicating a direct influence of vapour pressure deficit on the stomata. The rate of net photosynthesis decreased to a smaller degree than the leaf conductance when the vapour pressure deficit around the leaf was varied. Overall, the net photosynthetic rate decreased almost linearly from 20 to 25 μmol m-2 s-1 at-0.3 MPa to 5 μmol m-2 s-1 at-1.2 MPa. As the soil water decreased, the internal carbon dioxide partial pressure was maintained between 14 and 25 Pa.
No unique relationship between leaf conductance, transpiration rate or photosynthetic rate and leaf water potential was observed, but in all experiments leaf conductance and the rate of net photosynthesis decreased when about two-thirds of the extractable water in the solid had been utilized irrespective of the leaf water potential. We conclude that soil water status, not leaf water status, affects the stomatal behaviour and photosynthesis of H. annuus.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aspinall D (1980) Role of abscisic acid and other hormones in adaptation to water stress. In: Turner NC, Kramer PJ (eds) Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress. Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp 155–172
Begg JE, Turner NC (1976) Crop water deficits. Adv Agron 46:343–346
Black CR, Squire GR (1979) Effects of atmospheric saturation deficit on the stomatal conductance of pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoides S. and H.) and groundnut (Arachis hypoguesa L.) J Exp Bot 30:935–945
Boyer JS (1971) Non stomatal inhibition of photosynthesis in sunflower at low leaf water potentials and high light intensities. Plant Physiol 48:532–536
Boyer JS, Knipling EB (1965) Isopiestic technique for measuring leaf water potentials with a thermocouple psychrometer. Proc Nat Acad Sci US 54:1044–1051
Boyer JS, Potter JR (1973) Chloroplast response to low water potential. I. Role of turgor. Plant Physiol 51:989–992
Brown PW, Tanner CB (1981) Alfalfa water potential measurement: a comparison of the pressure chamber and leaf dew-point hygrometers. Crop Sci 21:240–244
Cowan IR (1977) Stomatal behaviour and environment. Adv Bot Res 4:117–228
Gollan T, Turner NC, Schulze E-D (1985) The responses of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapour pressure deficits and soil water content. III. In the sclerophyllous woody shrub Nerium oleander. Oecologia (berlin) (in press)
Hall AE, Schulze E-D (1980) Stomatal response to environment and a possible interrelation between stomatal effects on transpiration and CO2 assimilation. Plant Cell Environ 3:467–474
Heiser CB (1951) The sunflower among the North American Indians. Proc Am Philos Soc 95:432–448
Johnson JD, Ferrell WK (1983) Stomatal response to vapour pressure deficit and the effect of plant water stress. Plant Cell Environ 6:451–456
Jones MM, Rawson HM (1979) Influence of rate of development of leaf water deficits upon photosynthesis, leaf conductance, water use efficiency, and osmotic potential in sorghum. Physiol Plant 45:103–111
Lösch R (1979) Stomatal responses to changes in air humidity. In: Sen DN, Chawan DD, Bansal RP (eds) Structure, function and ecology of stomata. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun, pp 189–216
Ludlow MM (1980) Adaptive significance of stomatal responses to water stress. In: Turner NC, Kramer PJ (eds) Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress. Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp 123–138
Osonubi O, Davies WJ (1980) The influence of plant water stress on stomatal control of gas exchange at different levels of atmospheric humidity. Oecologia (Berlin) 46:1–6
Pierce M, Raschke K (1980) Correlation between loss of turgor and accumulation of abscisic acid in detached leaves. Planta 148:174–182
Rawson HM, Constable GA, Howe GN (1980) Carbon production of sunflower cultivars in field and controlled environments. II. Leaf growth. Aust J Plant Physiol 7:575–586
Ritchie JT (1974) Atmospheric and soil water influences on the plant water balance. Agric Meteorol 14:183–198
Schulze E-D, Küppers M (1979) Short-term and long-term effects of plant water deficits on stomatal response to humidity in Corylus avellana L. Planta 146:319–326
Sobrado MA (1983) Influence of water deficits on the water relations and growth of wild and cultivated sunflowers. Ph. D. thesis, The Australian National University, Canberra
Sobrado MA, Turner NC (1983) A comparison of the water relations characteristics of Helianthus annuus and Helianthus petiolaris when subjected to water deficits. Oecologia (Berlin) 58:309–313
Turner NC (1974a) Stomatal response to light and water under field conditions. In: Bieleski RL, Ferguson AR, Cresswell MM (eds), Mechanisms of regulation of plant growth. Bull 12, Royal Society of New Zealand, Wellington, pp 423–432
Turner NC (1974b) Stomatal behavior and water status of maize, sorghum, and tobacco under field conditions. II. At low soil water potential. Plant Physiol 53:360–365
Turner NC, Begg JE, Tonnet ML (1978) Osmotic adjustment of sorghum and sunflower crops in response to water deficits and its influence on the water potential at which stomata close. Aust J Plant Physiol 5:597–608
Turner NC, Schulze E-D, Gollan T (1984a) The responses of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapour pressure deficits and soil water content. I. Species comparisons at high soil water contents. Oecologia (Berlin) 63:338–342
Turner NC, Spurway RA, Schulze E-D (1984b) Comparison of water potentials measured by in situ psychrometry and pressure chamber in morphologically different species. Plant Physiol 74:316–319
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turner, N.C., Schulze, E.D. & Gollan, T. The responses of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapour pressure deficits and soil water content. Oecologia 65, 348–355 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378908
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378908