Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 59, Issue 2–3, pp 272–278 | Cite as

Ecological correlates of explosive seed dispersal

  • Nancy E. Stamp
  • Jeffrey R. Lucas
Original Papers

Summary

Based on the constraints of the ballistic mechanism, we suggest that plants that utilize explosive dispersal are either maximizing ballistic distances or maximizing secondary dispersal (and thus are ballistically short-distance dispersers). Explosive seed dispersal of seven plant species was investigated in terms of factors contributing to the distance that seeds are thrown. As predicted, the long distance dispersers (4 species) showed more constancy in distance that seeds were thrown relative to the ballistically short-distance dispersers (3 species). The distribution of explosively dispersed seeds in terms of a resource for post-dispersal predators was evaluated by computer simulation. The results indicated that seed predation is unlikely to contribute to maximizing seed dispersal distance. A model for explosive seed dispersal was developed, based on the constraints of such dispersal. Long-distance dispersers were expected to use small, closely-spaced patches or to use large patches in which inbreeding depression or competition selects for maximal dispersal distances. Short-distance dispersers were expected to use small, widely-spaced patches where ballistic dispersal in itself is an inadequate means to disperse seeds, or to use large patches in which there is no premium for dispersal distance. Preliminary evidence supported the model.

Keywords

Depression Explosive Computer Simulation Seed Dispersal Dispersal Distance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold RM (1981) Population dynamics and seed dispersal of Chaenorrhinum minus on railroad cinder ballast. Am Midl Nat 106:80–91Google Scholar
  2. Barr AJ, Goodnight JH, Sall JP, Blair WH, Chilko DM (1979) SAS user's guide. SAS Inst. RaleighGoogle Scholar
  3. Beattie AJ, Culver DC (1981) The guild of myrmecochores in the herbaceous flora of West Virginia forests. Ecology 62:107–115Google Scholar
  4. Beattie AJ, Lyons N (1975) Seed dispersal in Viola (Violaceae): adaptations and strategies. Am J Bot 62:714–722Google Scholar
  5. Comins HN, Hamilton WD, May RM (1980) Evolutionary stable dispersal strategies. J Theor Biol 82:205–230Google Scholar
  6. Culver DC, Beattie AJ (1978) Myrmecochory in Viola: dynamics of seed-ant interactions in some West Virginia species. J Ecol 66:53–72Google Scholar
  7. Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Harper JL, Lovell PH, Moore KG (1970) The shapes and sizes of seeds. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 1:327–356Google Scholar
  9. Janzen DH (1969) Seed-eaters versus seed size number, toxicity and dispersal. Evolution 23:1–27Google Scholar
  10. Janzen DH (1970) Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. Am Nat 104:501–528Google Scholar
  11. Leverich WJ, Levin DA (1979) Age-specific survivorship and reproduction in Phlox drummondii. Am Nat 113:881–903Google Scholar
  12. Levin DA (1978) Genetic variation in annual phlox: self-compatible versus self-incompatible species. Evolution 32:245–263Google Scholar
  13. Levin DA, Kerster HW (1968) Local gene dispersal in Phlox. Evolution 22:130–139Google Scholar
  14. Levin DA, Kerster HW (1974) Gene flow in seed plants. Evol Biol 7:139–220Google Scholar
  15. Lucas JR (1982) The biophysics of pit construction by antlion larvae (Myrmeleon, Neuroptera). Anim Beh 30:651–664Google Scholar
  16. Price MV, Waser NM (1979) Pollen dispersal and optimal outcrossing in Delphinium nelsoni. Nature (Lond) 277:294–297Google Scholar
  17. Ridley HN (1930) The dispersal of plants throughout the world. Reeve, KentGoogle Scholar
  18. Schemske DW (1978) Evolution of reproductive characteristics in Impatiens (Balsaminaceae): the significance of cleistogamy and chasmogamy. Ecology 59:596–613Google Scholar
  19. Southwood TRE (1978) Ecological methods, 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Swaine MD, Dakubu T, Beer T (1979) On the theory of explosively dispersed seeds: a correction. New Phytol 82:777–781Google Scholar
  21. Waller DM (1980) Environmental determinants of outcrossing in Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae). Evolution 34:747–761Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nancy E. Stamp
    • 1
  • Jeffrey R. Lucas
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations