Oecologia

, Volume 71, Issue 3, pp 369–374 | Cite as

Field water relations of a wet-tropical forest tree species, Pentaclethra macroloba (Mimosaceae)

  • S. F. Oberbauer
  • B. R. Strain
  • G. H. Riechers
Original Papers

Summary

The water relations of Pentaclethra macroloba (Willd.) Kuntze, a dominant, shade-tolerant, tree species in the Atlantic lowlands of Costa Rica, were examined within the forest canopy. Pressure-volume curves and diurnal courses of stomatal conductance and leaf water potential were measured in order to assess differences in water relations between understory, mid-canopy and canopy leaves. Leaves in the canopy had the smallest pinnules but the largest stomatal frequencies and stomatal conductances of the three forest levels. Osmotic potentials at full turgidity decreased with height in the forest; in the canopy and midcanopy they were reduced relative to those in the understory just enough to balance the gravitational component of water potential. Consequently, maximum turgor pressures were similar for leaves from all three canopy levels. Bulk tissue elastic modulus increased with height in the canopy. Leaf water potentials were lowest in the canopy and highest in the understory, even when the gravitational component was added to mid-canopy and canopy values. As a result, minimum turgor pressures were also lowest in the canopy compared to those at lesser heights, and approached zero in full sunlight on clear days.

Osmotic potentials at each canopy level were similar for both wet and dry season samples dates suggesting that seasonal osmotic adjustment does not occur. Despite lowered predawn water potentials during the dry season, turgor was maintained in the understory by reduced stomatal conductances.

Key words

Penthaclethra Pressure-volume curves Stomatal conductance Water potential Osmotic potential 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bazzaz FA (1979) The physiological ecology of plant succession. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 10:351–371Google Scholar
  2. Bazzaz FA (1984) Dynamics of wet tropical forests and their species strategies. In: Medina E, Mooney HA, Vasquez-Yanes C (eds) Physiological Ecology of Plants of the Wet Tropics. Junk, The Hague, pp 233–243Google Scholar
  3. Björkman O, Ludlow MM (1972) Characterization of the light climate on the floor of a Queensland rainforest. Carnegie Inst Wash Yrbk 71:85–94Google Scholar
  4. Boardman NK (1977) Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 28:335–337Google Scholar
  5. Chazdon RL, Fetcher N (1984) Photosynthetic light environments in a lowland tropical rainforest in Costa Rica. J Ecol 72:553–564Google Scholar
  6. Cheung YNS, Tyree MT, Dainty J (1975) Water relations parameters on single leaves obtained in a pressure bomb and some ecological interpretations. Can J Bot 53: 1432–1436Google Scholar
  7. Chiariello N (1984) Leaf energy balance in the wet lowland tropics. In: Medina E, Mooney HA, Vasquez-Yanes C (eds) Physiological Ecology of Plants of the Wet Tropics. Junk, The Hague, pp 85–98Google Scholar
  8. Fetcher N, Oberbauer SF, Strain BR (1985) Vegetation effects on microclimate in lowland tropical forest in Costa Rica. Int J Biometr 29:145–155Google Scholar
  9. Frankie GW, Baker HG, Opler PA (1974) Comparative phenological studies of trees in tropical wet and dry forests in the lowlands of Costa Rica. J Ecol 62:881–919Google Scholar
  10. Givnish TJ (1984) Leaf and canopy adaptations in tropical forests. In: Medina E, Mooney HA, Vasquez-Yanes C (eds) Physiological Ecology of Plants of the Wet Tropics. Junk, The Hague, pp 51–84Google Scholar
  11. Givnish TJ, Vermeij GJ (1976) Sizes and shapes of laane leaves. Am Nat 100:743–778Google Scholar
  12. Hartshorn GS (1972) The ecological life history and population dynamics of Pentaclethra macroloba, a wet forest dominant, and Stryphnodendron excelsum, an occasional associate. PhD dissertation, University of WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  13. Hartshorn GS (1975) A matrix of tree population dynamics. In: Golley FB, Medina E (eds) Tropical Ecological Systems: Trends in Terrestrial and Aquatic Research. Springer, New York, pp 41–51Google Scholar
  14. Hellkvist J, Richards GP, Jarvis PG (1974) Vertical gradients of water potential and tissue water relations in Sitka spruce trees measured with the pressure chamber. J Appl Ecol 11:637–667Google Scholar
  15. Herbert TJ (1983) The influence of axial rotation upon interception of solar radiation by plant leaves. J Theoret Biol 105:603–618Google Scholar
  16. Holdridge LR, Grenke WC, Hatheway WH, Liang T, Tosi JA Jr (1971) Forest Environments in Tropical Life Zones: A Pilot Study. Pergamon Press, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaufmann MR (1982a) Leaf conductance as a function of photosynthetic photon flux density and absolute humidity difference from leaf to air. Plant Physiol 69: 1018–1022Google Scholar
  18. Kaufmann MR (1982b) Evaluation of season, temperature, and water stress effects on stomata using a leaf conductance model. Plant Physiol 69:1023–1026Google Scholar
  19. Loach K (1967) Shade tolerance in tree seedlings. I. Leaf photosynthesis and respiration in plants raised under artificial shade. New Phytol 66:607–621Google Scholar
  20. Monson RK, Smith SD (1982) Seasonal water potential components of Sonoran desert plants. Ecology 63:113–123Google Scholar
  21. Oberbauer SF (1983) The ecophysiology of Pentaclethra macroloba, a canopy tree species in the rainforests of Costa Rica. PhD dissertation, Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
  22. Oberbauer SF, Strain BR (1985) Effects of light regime on the growth and physiology of Pentaclethra macroloba (Willd.) Kuntze in Costa Rica. J Trop Ecol 1:303–320Google Scholar
  23. Oberbauer SF, Strain BR (1986) Effects of canopy position and irradiance on the leaf physiology and morphology of Pentaclethra macroloba (Willd.) Kuntz. Am J Bot 73:409–416Google Scholar
  24. Osonubi, O, Davies WJ (1980) The influence of water stress on the photosynthetic performance and stomatal behaviour of tree seedlings subjected, to variation in temperature and irradiance. Oecologia (Berlin) 45:3–10Google Scholar
  25. Parkhurst DF, Loucks OL (1972) Optimal leaf size in relation to environment. J Ecol 60:505–537Google Scholar
  26. Perry DR (1980) A method of access into the crowns of emergent and canopy trees. Biotropica 10:155–157Google Scholar
  27. Roberts SW, Knoerr KR (1977) Components of water potential estimated from xylem pressure measurements in five tree species. Oecologia (Berlin) 28:191–202Google Scholar
  28. Roberts SW, Miller PC, Valamanesh A (1981a) Comparative field water relations of four co-occurring chaparral shrub species. Oecologia (Berlin) 48:360–363Google Scholar
  29. Roberts SW, Strain BR, Knoerr KR (1981b) Seasonal variation of leaf tissue elasticity in four forest tree species. Physiol Plant 52:245–250Google Scholar
  30. Robichaux RH (1984) Variation in the tissue water relations of two sympatric Hawaiian Dubautia species and their natural hybrid. Oecologia (Berlin) 65:75–81Google Scholar
  31. Robichaux RH, Rundel PW, Stemmermann L, Canfield JE, Morse SR, Friedman E (1984) Tissue water deficits and plant growth in wet tropical environments. In: Medina E, Mooney HA, Vasquez-Yanes C (eds) Physiological Ecology of Plants of the Wet Tropics. Junk, The Hague, pp 99–112Google Scholar
  32. Satter RL (1979) Leaf movements and tendril curling. In: Haupt W, Feinleib ME (eds) Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, (New Series) Vol 7. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 442–484Google Scholar
  33. Scholander PF, Hammel HT, Bradstreet ED, Hemmingsen EA (1965) Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science 148:339–346Google Scholar
  34. Tyree MT, Jarvis PG (1982) Water in tissue and cells. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H (eds) Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, (New Series) Vol 12 B. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 35–77Google Scholar
  35. Wallace LL, Dunn EL (1980) Comparative photosynthesis of three gap phase successional tree species. Oecologia (Berlin) 45:331–340Google Scholar
  36. Whitehead D, Okali DUU, Fasehun FE (1981) Stomatal response to environmental variables in two tropical forest species during the dry season in Nigeria. J Appl Ecol 18:571–587Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. F. Oberbauer
    • 1
  • B. R. Strain
    • 1
  • G. H. Riechers
    • 1
  1. 1.Duke Phytotron, Department of BotanyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Systems Ecology Research GroupSan Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations