, Volume 79, Issue 4, pp 496–505 | Cite as

Foraging strategy in a subterranean rodent, Spalax ehrenbergi: a test case for optimal foraging theory

  • G. Heth
  • E. M. Golenberg
  • E. Nevo
Original Papers


The foraging behavior of the subterranean mole rat Spalax ehrenbergi (Rodentia, Spalacidae) was tested according to the framework of optimal foraging theory. We compared the frequencies of food species hoarded in storage chambers of mole rats with the frequencies of these species occurring in the vicinity of the mole rats' nest mounds during the winter and spring seasons. In addition, we examined the food composition of several summer nest mounds. Laboratory observations were conducted in order to test the foraging behavior of mole rats under simulated subterranean conditions. The mole rat is a generalist and collects a variety of food species. Out of 33 plant species that were hoarded by mole rats in the 21 studied nest mounds, 61% (n=20) were geophytes, 21% (n=7) perennial herbs, 15% (n=5) annual herbs and 3% (n=1) dwarf shrubs. The frequency of each collected species in the 16 winter and spring nest mounds is in general accordance with its frequency in the mole rat's territory. This implies that the mole rat randomly samples the food reserve of its territory without special preference or directed search for a particular species. The collection or avoidance of any food item is not dependent on the presence or absence of any other food item. We suggest that the foragin generalism of the mole rat is a product of the constraints of a subterranean niche — the necessity to hoard food as much as possible in a limited time period and the high energetic investment of tunneling to the food items.

Key words

Optimal foraging Diet Subterranean rodents Spatax ehrenbergi 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arieli R (1979) The atmospheric environment of the fossorial mole (Spalax ehrenbergi): Effects of seasons, soil texture, rain, temperature and activity. Comp Biochem Physiol 63A:569–575Google Scholar
  2. Arieli R, Ar A, Shkolnik A (1977) Metabolic responses of a fossorial rodent (Spalax ehrenbergi) to simulated burrow conditions. Physiol Zool 50:61–75Google Scholar
  3. Atlas of Israel (1970) Pub Dept. Surveys Ministry of Labour. Bialik Institute, and Jewish AgencyGoogle Scholar
  4. Burr EJ (1960) The distribution of Kendall's score S for a pair of tied rankings. Biometrika 47:151–171Google Scholar
  5. Collis-George N (1959) The physical environment of soil animals. Ecology 40:550–557Google Scholar
  6. Emlen JM (1966) The role of time and energy in food preference. Am Nat 101:611–617Google Scholar
  7. Galil J (1961) Kinetics of Geophytes, Publishing House Hakibbutz Hameuchad Ltd Tel Aviv, p 232Google Scholar
  8. Glasser JW (1984) Is conventional foraging theory optimal? Am Nat 124:900–905Google Scholar
  9. Gould SJ, Lewontin R (1979) The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc Lond Biol Sci 205:581–598Google Scholar
  10. Haim A, Heth G, Pratt H, Nevo E (1983) Photoperiodic effects on thermoregulations in a blind subterranean mammal. J Exp Biol 107:59–64Google Scholar
  11. Hansen RM, Ward AL (1966) Some relations of pocket gophers to rangelands on Grand Mesa, Colorado. Tech Bull 88:1–21Google Scholar
  12. Hansen RM, Vaughan TA, Hervey DF, Harris TV, Hegdal PL, Johnson AM, Ward AL, Reid EH, Keith JO (1960) Pocket gophers in Colorado State Univ Exp Stn Bull 508-S1-26, p 25Google Scholar
  13. Heth G (1989) Burrow patterns of the mole rat Spalax ehrenbergi in two soil types (Terra-rossa and Rendzina) in Mount Carmel, Israel. J Zool Lond 217:39–56Google Scholar
  14. Jarvis JUM, Sale JB (1971) Burrowing and burrowing patterns of East African mole rats Tachyoryctes, Heliophobius, and Heterocephalus. J. Zool 163:451–479Google Scholar
  15. Kingdon J (1974) East African mammals. An atlas of evolution in Africa. Vol. II. Part B (Hares and rodents). Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Krebs JR (1978) Optimal foraging: Decision rules for predators. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, Oxford: Blackwell, pp 23–63Google Scholar
  17. Krebs JR, Stephens DW, Sutherland WJ (1983) Perspectives in optimal foraging. In: Bush AH, Clark CA Jr, Perspectives in Ornithology: Essays presented for the Centennial of the American Ornithologists' Union, Cambridge University Press, England, pp 165–221Google Scholar
  18. MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100:603–609Google Scholar
  19. Miller RS (1964) Ecology and distribution of pocket gophers (Geomyidae) in Colorado. Ecology 45:256–272Google Scholar
  20. Moore AW, Reid EH (1951) The Dallas pocket gophers and its influence on forage production of Oregon mountain meadows. USDA circ 884:1–36Google Scholar
  21. Nevo E (1961) Observations on Israeli populations of the mole rat Spalax ehrenbergi Nehring 1898. Mammalia 25:127–144Google Scholar
  22. Nevo E (1978) The diet of fossorial mole rats, Spalax, in nature and laboratory. In: Recheigl M (ed) Handbook of Nutrition and Food. CSR Press, Cleveland, OhioGoogle Scholar
  23. Nevo E (1979) Adaptive convergence and divergence of subterranean mammals. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 10:269–308Google Scholar
  24. Nevo E (1985) Speciation in action and adaptation in subterranean mole rates: Patterns and theory. Bull Zool 52:65–95Google Scholar
  25. Nevo E (1986a) Evolutionary behavior genetics in active speciation and adaptation of fossorial mole rats. Accad Naz Lincei 259:39–109Google Scholar
  26. Nevo E (1986b) Mechanisms of adaptive speciation at the molecular and organismal levels. In: Karlin S, Nevo E (eds) Evolutionary. Academic Press, New York, pp 439–474Google Scholar
  27. Nevo E (1989) Modes of speciation: The nature and role of peripheral isolates in the origin of species. In: Gidding LY, Kaneshiro KY, Anderson WW (eds) Genetics speciation and the founder principle. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Nevo E, Heth G, Beiles A (1982) Population structure and speciation in mole rats. Evolution, 36:1283–1289Google Scholar
  29. Pearson OP (1960) Biology of the subterranean rodents, Ctenomys, in Peru. Mem Mus Hist Nat Javier Prado 9:1–56Google Scholar
  30. Pyke GH (1984) Optimal Foraging Theory: A critical review. An Rev Ecol Syst 15:523–575Google Scholar
  31. Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: A selective review of theory and tests. Quart Rev Biol 52:137–154Google Scholar
  32. Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. An Rev Ecol Syst 2:369–404Google Scholar
  33. Schoener TW (1974) The compression hypothesis and temporal resource partitioning. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 71:4169–4172Google Scholar
  34. Schoener TW (1987) A brief history of optimal foraging ecology. In: Kamil A, Krebs JR, Pulliam HR (eds) Plenum PressGoogle Scholar
  35. Seligman N (1973) A Quantitative Geobotanical Analysis of the Vegetation of the Golan. Ph D Thesis, Hebrew Univ Jerusalem. (in Hebrew, with English summary)Google Scholar
  36. Shmida A (1977) A Quantitative Analysis of the Tragacanthic Vegetation of Mt. Hermon and its Relations to Environmental Factors. Ph D Thesis, Hebrew Univ Jerusalem. (in Hebrew, with English summary)Google Scholar
  37. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. WH Freeman and Co, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  38. Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  39. Vegetation of Israel (1984) Vol 8. Waisel Y (ed) of the Encyclopedia of Plants and Animals of the Land of Israel. Ministry of Defense/Publishing House and the Society for Protection of Nature. (in Hebrew)Google Scholar
  40. Vleck D (1979) The energy cost of burrowing by the pocket gopher Thomomys bottae. Physiol Zool 52:122–136Google Scholar
  41. Vleck D (1981) Burrow structure and foraging costs in the fossorial rodent Thomomys bottae. Oecologia 49:391–396Google Scholar
  42. Waisel Y, Pollak G, Cohen Y (1978) The Ecology of Vegetation of Israel. Division of Ecology Ltd. Petah-Tiqwa Israel (in Hebrew)Google Scholar
  43. Williams LR, Cameron GN (1986) Food habits and dietary preferences of Attwater's Pocket Gopher, Geomys attwateri. J Mamm 67:489–496Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Heth
    • 1
  • E. M. Golenberg
    • 1
  • E. Nevo
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of EvolutionUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Botany and Plant SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations