Oecologia

, Volume 75, Issue 2, pp 204–206

Functional analysis of the myrmecophilous relationships between ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and lycaenids (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)

II. Lycaenid larvae as trophobiotic partners of ants—a quantitative approach
  • Konrad Fiedler
  • Ulrich Maschwitz
Original Papers

Summary

Mature larvae of the myrmecophilous lycaenid Polyommatus coridon produce an average of 30.9 droplets of a honeydew-like secretion per hour. They occur in population densities of about 20/m2. The volume of secretion over the whole larval period is estimated to be 22–44 μl with an energy content of 55–110 J. Thus, P. coridon larvae produce carbohydrate secretions with an energy equivalent of 1.1–2.2 kJ/m2. Using data from the literature on ant metabolism, it is shown that these carbohydrate secretions may contribute significantly to the nutrition of attending ants. The myrmecophilous relationship between the larvae of P. coridon and ants should therefore be regarded as a mutualistic symbiosis.

Key words

Lycaenidae Formicidae Myrmecophily Symbiosis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brian MV (1977) Ants. The new naturalist 59:1–223. Collins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Brian MV (1979) Habitat differences in sexual production by two co-existent ants. J Anim Ecol 48:943–953Google Scholar
  3. Brian MV, Hibble J, Stradling DJ (1965) Ant pattern and density in a southern English heath. J Anim Ecol 34:545–555Google Scholar
  4. Cottrell CB (1984) Aphytophagy in butterflies: its relationship to myrmecophily. Zool J Linn Soc 79:1–57Google Scholar
  5. De Vries PJ (1984) Of crazy-ants and Curetinae: are Curetis butterflies tended by ants? Zool J Linn Soc 79:59–66Google Scholar
  6. Fiedler K (1987) Tetramorium caespitum (Linnaeus 1758) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), eine weitere mit Polyommatus coridon (Poda, 1761) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) vergesellschaftete Ameisenart. Nachr Ent Ver Apollo (Frankfurt) N F 8:60Google Scholar
  7. Fiedler K, Maschwitz U (1988a) Functional analysis of the myrmecophilous relationships between ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Lycaenids (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). I. Releasa of food recruitment in ants by Lycaenid larvae and pupae. Ethology (in press)Google Scholar
  8. Fiedler K, Maschwitz U (1988b) Functional analysis of the myrmecophilous relationships between ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Lycaenids (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). III. New aspects of the function of the retractile tentacular organs of Lycaenid larvae. Zool Beitr (in press)Google Scholar
  9. Henning SF (1983) Chemical communication between lycaenid larvae (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) and ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Ent Soc Sth Afr 46:65–85Google Scholar
  10. Kitching RL (1983) Myrmecophilous organs of the larvae and pupae of the lycaenid butterfly Jalmenus evagoras (DONOVAN). J Nat Hist 17:471–481Google Scholar
  11. Kitching RL, Luke B (1985) The myrmecophilous organs of the larvae of some British Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera): a comparative study. J Nat Hist 19:259–276Google Scholar
  12. Lenz F (1917) Der Erhaltungsgrund der Myrmekophilie. Z Indukt Abstammg Vererbungsl 18:44–48Google Scholar
  13. Malicky H (1969) Versuch einer Analyse der ökologischen Beziehungen zwischen Lycaeniden (Lepitoptera) und Formiciden (Hymenoptera). Tijdschr Ent 112 (8):213–298Google Scholar
  14. Malicky H (1970) Unterschiede im Angriffsverhalten von Formica-Arten (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) gegenüber Lycaenidenraupen (Lepidoptera). Ins Soc 17 (2):121–124Google Scholar
  15. Maschwitz U, Wüst M, Schurian K (1975) Bläulingsraupen als Zuckerlieferanten für Ameisen. Oecologia (Berlin) 18:17–21Google Scholar
  16. Nielsen MG (1972) An attempt to estimate energy flow through a population of workers of Lasius alienus (Först) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Natura Jutland 16:97–107Google Scholar
  17. Nielsen MG (1978) Production of sexuals in nests of the ant Lasius alienus (Först.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Natura Jutland 20:251–254Google Scholar
  18. Peakin GJ (1972) Aspects of productivity in Tetramorium caespitum L. Ekologia Polska 20:55–63Google Scholar
  19. Peakin GJ, Josens G (1978) Respiration and energy flow. In: Brian MV (ed.) Production ecology of ants and termites. Int Biol Programme 13:111–164Google Scholar
  20. Pierce NE (1983) The ecology and evolution of symbioses between lycaenid butterflies and ants. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
  21. Pierce NE (1984) Amplified species diversity: a case study of an Australian lycaenid butterfly and its attendant ants. Symp Royal Ent Soc London 11:197–200Google Scholar
  22. Pierce NE, Eastseal S (1986) The selective advantage of attendant ants for the larvae of a lycaenid butterfly, Glaucopsyche lygdamus. J Anim Ecol 55:451–462Google Scholar
  23. Pierce NE, Mead PS (1981) Parasitoids as selective agents in the symbiosis between lycaenid butterfly larvae and ants. Science 112:1185–1187Google Scholar
  24. Samson PR, O'Brien CF (1981) Predation on Ogyris genoveva (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) by meat ants. Austral Ent Mag 8:21Google Scholar
  25. Thomann H (1901) Schmetterlinge und Ameisen. Beobachtungen über eine Symbiose zwischen Lycaena argus L. und Formica cinerea Mayr. Jber Naturf Ges Graubünden 44:1–40Google Scholar
  26. Thomas JA (1983) The ecology and conservation of Lysandra bellargus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Britain. J Appl Ecol 20:59–83Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Konrad Fiedler
    • 1
  • Ulrich Maschwitz
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoologisches Institut der J.W. Goethe-UniversitätFrankfurt/MFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations