Nutrition and burrowing energetics of the Cape mole-rat Georychus capensis
- 101 Downloads
- 31 Citations
Summary
At 22°C the resting oxygen consumption of G. capensis is 1.13±0.05 cm3O2·g-1·h-1 (mean± S.E.). In loose sandy soil the burrowing metabolic rate was approximately three times that of resting (3.41±0.19 cm3O2·g-1· h-1). Rate of oxygen consumption while burrowing bears a linear relationship with rate of burrowing. The equation of the regression line describing this relationship was used to construct a model for calculating energy expenditure of burrowing in free-living mole-rats. The diet of G. capensis consists of some green plant material and geophyte corms. The latter has a mean gross energy content of 16.36 kJ·g-1 dry weight. The digestibility coefficient for captive G. capensis fed on sweet potato, was 97.42±0.41%. Data collected from an excavated burrow system revealed that the total energetic cost of constructing the burrow amounted to 79% of the estimated digestible energy available from geophyte corms in the area. A food store in the same burrow system was sufficient to meet the maintenance requirements of an adult G. capensis, resting at 22°C, for approximately 80–85 days. Soil samples taken at random adjacent to the burrow contained corms with a mean estimated digestible energy value of 2084 kJ per m3 of soil. A comparison of energetic cost of burrowing and randomly available digestible energy in the field suggests that foraging patterns are not random.
Keywords
Energy Expenditure Soil Sample Oxygen Consumption Metabolic Rate Regression LinePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Andersen DC (1982) Below ground herbivory: The adaptive geometry of geomyid burrows. Am Nat 119(1):18–26Google Scholar
- Areili R Ar A (1981) Heart-rate responses of the mole-rat (Spalax ehrenbergi) in hypercapnic, hypoxic and cold conditions. Physiol Zool 54(1):14–21Google Scholar
- Areili R, Ar A, Shkolnik A (1977) Metabolic responses of a fossorial rodent (Spalax ehrenbergi) to simulated burrow conditions. Physiol Zool 50:61–75Google Scholar
- Chapman RC, Bennett AF (1975) Physiological correlates of burrowing rodents. Comp Biochem Physiol 51:599–603Google Scholar
- Durnin JVGA, Passmore R (1967) Energy, Work, and Leisure. Heineman LondonGoogle Scholar
- Gettinger RD (1975) Metabolism and thermoregulation of a fossorial rodent, the northern pocket gopher (Thomomys talpoides). Physiol Zool 48:311–322Google Scholar
- Jarvis JUM (1978) Energetics of survival in Heterocephalus glaber (Ruppell), the naked mole-rat (Rodentia: Bathyergidae). Bul Carnegie Mus Nat Hist 6:81–87Google Scholar
- Johnson DR, Schreiber BK (1979) Assimilation, respiration and production: (b) vertebrates. In: Goodall DW, Perry RA (eds) Arid land ecosystems, Vol 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 731–741Google Scholar
- McNab BK (1966) The metabolism of fossorial rodents: a study of convergence. Ecology 47:712–733Google Scholar
- Reichman OJ, Whiteman TG, Ruffner GA (1982) Adaptive geometry of burrow spacing in two pocket gopher populations. Ecology 63(3):687–695Google Scholar
- Schmidt-Nielsen K (1979) Animal physiology: Adaptation and Environment. 2nd Edition. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Vleck D (1979) The energy cost of burrowing by the pocket gopher Thomomys bottae. Physiol Zool 52:122–125Google Scholar
- Vleck D (1981) Burrow structure and foraging costs in the fossorial rodent Thomomys bottae. Oecologia (Berlin) 49:391–396Google Scholar
- Withers PC, Jarvis JUM (1980) The effect of huddling on thermoregulation and oxygen consumption for the naked mole-rat. Comp Biochem Physiol 66A:215–219Google Scholar