Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Rana cascadae tadpoles aggregate with siblings: an experimental field study

  • 35 Accesses

  • 32 Citations

Abstract

Previous laboratory studies have shown that Rana cascadae larvae preferentially associated with siblings over non-siblings in choice tests. This study, conducted during three consecutive summers, tests the hypothesis that R. cascadae larvae aggregate nonrandomly with respect to sibship in natural ponds. Pairs of sibships were reared in separate tanks or together in the same tank in the laboratory. Each sibship within a pair was then stained with neutral red or methylene blue dye and released together in a natural pond. Over a period of several days, aggregations of tadpoles within test ponds were repeatedly captured, censused for sibship composition, and released. In control tests, two groups of tadpoles from the same sibship were dyed different colors and released together. In total, 25 different tests were conducted using tadpoles from 31 sibships and 456 aggregations were sampled. The distribution of color compositions of aggregations in control tests did not differ from an expected random distribution. Color compositions of aggregations in experimental tests differed from controls and from an expected random distribution. Aggregations in these tests tended to be dominated by one of the two colors (sibships). We conclude that R. cascadae tadpoles recognize and prefer to aggregate with siblings in natural field conditions. Circumstances of early rearing (i.e., whether tadpoles were reared with siblings or in mixed sibling/non-sibling groups) had no influence on preferences to associate with siblings, but there was an inverse correlation between group size and sibling association.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alexander RD (1974) The evolution of social behavior. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 5:325–383

  2. Bateson P (1982) Preferences for cousins in Japanese quail. Nature 295:236–237

  3. Beecher JM, Beecher MD (1983) Sibling recognition in bank swallows (Riparia riparia). Z Tierpsychol 62:141–150

  4. Beiswenger RE (1972) Aggregative behavior of tadpoles of the American toad, Bufo americanus, in Michigan. PhD thesis, Univ of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  5. Beiswenger RE (1975) Structure and function in aggregations of tadpoles of the American toad, Bufo americanus. Herpetologica 31:222–233

  6. Bertram BCR (1978) Living in groups: predators and prey. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Smauer Assoc, Sunderland, MA, pp 64–96

  7. Blaustein AR (1983) Kin recognition mechanisms: phenotypic matching or recognition alleles? Am Nat 121:749–754

  8. Blaustein AR, O'Hara RK (1981) Genetic control for sibling recognition? Nature 290:246–248

  9. Blaustein AR, O'Hara RK (1982a) Kin recognition in Rana cascadae tadpoles: maternal and paternal effects. Anim Behav 30:1151–1157

  10. Blaustein AR, O'Hara RK (1982b) Kin recognition cues in Rana cascadae tadpoles. Behav Neural Biol 36:77–87

  11. Blaustein AR, O'Hara RK (1983) Kin recognition in Rana cascadae tadpoles: effects of rearing with nonsiblings and varying the strength of the stimulus cues. Behav Neural Biol 39:259–267

  12. Breed MD (1983) Nestmate recognition in honey bees. Anim Behav 31:86–91

  13. Breed MD, Bekoff M (1981) Individual recognition and social relationships. J Theoret Biol 88:589–593

  14. Calef GW (1973) Natural mortality of tadpoles in a population of Rana aurora. Ecology 54:741–758

  15. Colgan P (1983) Comparative social recognition. J Wiley & Sons, New York

  16. Crozier RH, Dix MW (1979) Analysis of two genetic models for the innate components of colony odor in social Hymenoptera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:217–224

  17. DeBenedictis PA (1974) Interspecific competition between tadpoles of Rana pipiens and Rana sylvatica: an experimental field study. Ecol Monogr 44:129–151

  18. Getz WM (1981) Genetically based kin recognition systems. J Theoret Biol 92:209–226

  19. Getz WM, Smith KB (1983) Genetic kin recognition: honey bees discriminate between full and half sisters. Nature 302:147–148

  20. Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183–190

  21. Grau HJ (1982) Kin recognition in white-footed deermice (Peromyscus leucopus). Anim Behav 30:497–505

  22. Greenberg L (1979) Genetic component of bee odor in kin recognition. Science 206:1095–1097

  23. Guttman SI, Creasey W (1973) Staining as a technique for marking tadpoles. J Herpetol 7:388

  24. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behavior, I, II. J Theoret Biol 7:1–51

  25. Hamilton WD (1971) Geometry for the selfish herd. J Theoret Biol 31:295–311

  26. Hassinger DD (1972) Early life history and ecology of three congeneric species of Rana in New Jersey. Ph.D. thesis, Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, NJ

  27. Herreid CF, Kinney S (1966) Survival of Alaskan wood frog (Rana sylvatica) larvae. Ecology 47:1039–1041

  28. Hews DK, Blaustein AR (1985) An investigation of the alarm response in Bufo boreas and Rana cascadae tadpoles. Behav Neural Biol, 43:47–57

  29. Holmes WG, Sherman PW (1982) The ontogeny of kin recognition in two species of ground squirrels. Amer Zool 22:491–517

  30. Jutsum AR, Saunders TS, Cherrett JM (1979) Intraspecific aggression in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex octospinosus. Anim Behav 27:839–844

  31. Kareem AM, Barnard CJ (1982) The importance of kinship and familiarity in social interactions between mice. Anim Behav 30:594–601

  32. Kurland JA (1980) Kin selection theory: a review and selective bibliography. Ethol Sociobiol 1:255–274

  33. Linsenmair KE (1972) Die Bedeutung familienspezifischer Abzeichen für den Familienzusammenhalt bei der sozialen Wüstenassel Hemilepistus reaumuri Audouin und Savigny (Crustacea, Isopoda, Oniscoidea). Z Tierpsychol 31:131–162

  34. Maynard Smith J (1964) Group selection and kin selection. Nature 201:1145–1147

  35. Meikle DB, Vessey SH (1981) Nepotism among rhesus monkey brothers. Nature 294:160–161

  36. O'Hara RK (1981) Habitat selection behavior in three species of anuran larvae: environmental cues, ontogeny, and adaptive significance. PhD thesis, Oregon State Univ, Corvallis

  37. O'Hara RK, Blaustein AR (1981) An investigation of sibling recognition in Rana cascadae tadpoles. Anim Behav 29:1121–1126

  38. O'Hara RK, Blaustein AR (1982) Kin preference behavior in Bufo boreas tadpoles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:43–49

  39. Porter RH, Wyrick M (1979) Sibling recognition in spiny mice (Acomys cahirinus): influence of age and isolation. Anim Behav 27:761–766

  40. Pulliam HR, Caraco T (1984) Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, second edition. Sinauer Assoc, Sunderland MA, pp 122–147

  41. Quinn TP, Busack CA (1985) Chemosensory recognition of siblings in juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Anim Behav 33:51–56

  42. Radesäter T (1976) Individual sibling recognition in juvenile Canada geese (Branta canadensis). Can J Zool 54:1069–1072

  43. Ross NM, Gamboa GJ (1981) Nestmate discrimination in social wasps (Polistes metricus, Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:163–165

  44. Sherman PW (1980) The limits of ground squirrel nepotism. In: Barlow GW, Silverberg J (eds) Sociobiology: beyond nature/nurture? Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp 505–544

  45. Shvarts SS, Pyastolova OA (1970) Regulators of growth and development of amphibian larvae. I. Specificity of effects. Sov J Ecol 1:58–62

  46. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, second edition. WH Freeman and Company, San Francisco, CA

  47. Travis J (1981) The effect of staining on the growth of Hyla gratiosa tadpoles. Copeia 1981:193–196

  48. Waldman B (1981) Sibling recognition in toad tadpoles: the role of experience. Z Tierpsychol 56:341–358

  49. Waldman B (1982) Sibling association among schooling toad tadpoles: field evidence and implications. Anim Behav 30:700–713

  50. Waldman B (1984) Kin recognition and sibling association among wood frog (Rana sylvatica) tadpoles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 14:171–180

  51. Wassersug RJ (1973) Aspects of social behavior in anuran larvae. In: Vial JL (ed) Evolutionary biology of the anurans. Univ of Missouri Press, Columbia, pp 273–297

  52. West Eberhard MJ (1975) The evolution of social behavior by kin selection. Q Rev Biol 50:1–33

  53. Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, MA

  54. Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Belknap Harvard, Cambridge, MA

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Richard K. O'Hara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Hara, R.K., Blaustein, A.R. Rana cascadae tadpoles aggregate with siblings: an experimental field study. Oecologia 67, 44–51 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378450

Download citation

Keywords

  • Methylene Blue
  • Group Size
  • Inverse Correlation
  • Random Distribution
  • Control Test