Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 205–211 | Cite as

Tannin assays in ecological studies: Lack of correlation between phenolics, proanthocyanidins and protein-precipitating constituents in mature foliage of six oak species

  • Joan Stadler Martin
  • Michael M. Martin
Article

Summary

There is no correlation between protein-precipitating capacity and either total phenolic or proanthocyanidin content of extracts of mature foliage from six species of oaks: Quercus alba (white oak), Q. bicolor (swamp white oak), Q. macrocarpa (bur oak), Q. palustris (pin oak), Q. rubra (red oak), and Q. velutina (black oak). It is argued that studies which probe the role of tannins in the selection and utilization of food by herbivores should include a protein-precipitation assay, since such an assay provides a measure of the property of tannins which is presumed to contribute to their utility as defensive compounds. A convenient modification of the bovine serum albumin (BSA) precipitation assay, which measures the amount of protein precipitated when a plant extract is added to a BSA solution, is described. Advantages of this procedure recommend its routine adoption in studies of the role of tannins in plant-herbivore interactions.

Keywords

Bovine Serum Albumin Tannin Alba Plant Extract Bovine Serum Albumin Solution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bate-Smith EC (1973) Haemanalysis of tannins: the concept of relative astringency. Phytochemistry 12:907–912Google Scholar
  2. Bate-Smith EC (1977) Astringent tannins of Acer species. Phytochemistry 16:1421–1426Google Scholar
  3. Bate-Smith EC (1981) Astringent tannins of the leaves of Geranium species. Phytochemistry 20:211–216Google Scholar
  4. Becker P, Martin JS (1982) Protein-binding capacity of tannins in Shorea (Dipterocarpaceae) seedling leaves. J Chem Ecol. in pressGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernays EA, Chamberlain D, McCarthy P (1980) The differential effects of ingested tannic acid on different species of Acridoidea. Entomol Exp Appl 28:158–166Google Scholar
  6. Bernays EA, Chamberlain DJ, Leather EM (1981) Tolerance of acridids to ingested condensed tannin. J Chem Ecol 7:247–256Google Scholar
  7. Bradford M (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254Google Scholar
  8. Burns RE (1971) Method for estimation of tannin in sorghum grain. Agron J 63:511–512Google Scholar
  9. Chan BG, Waiss AC, Lukefahr M (1978) Condensed tannin, an antibiotic chemical from Gossypium hirsutum. J Insect Physiol 24:113–118Google Scholar
  10. Feeny PP (1968) Effect of oak leaf tannins on larval growth of the winter moth Operophthera brumata. J Insect Physiol 14:805–817Google Scholar
  11. Feeny PP, (1970) Seasonal changes in oak leaf tannins and nutrients as a cause of spring feeding by winter moth caterpillars. Ecology 51:565–581Google Scholar
  12. Feeny P (1976) Plant apparency and chemical defense. Rec Adv Phytochem 10:1–40Google Scholar
  13. Fox LR, Macauley BJ (1977) Insect grazing on Eucalyptus in response to variation in leaf tannins and nitrogen. Oecologia (Berl) 29:145–162Google Scholar
  14. Goldstein JL, Swain T (1965) The inhibition of enzymes by tannins. Phytochemistry 4:185–192Google Scholar
  15. Govindarajan VS, Mathew AG (1965) Anthocyanidins from leucoanthocyanidins. Phytochemistry 4:985–988Google Scholar
  16. Hagerman AE, Butler LG (1978) Protein precipitation method for the quantitative determination of tannins. J Agric Food Chem 26:809–812Google Scholar
  17. Haslam E (1979) Vegetable tannins. Rec Adv Phytochemistry 12:475–523Google Scholar
  18. Hillis WE, Swain T (1959) The phenolic constituents of Prunus domesticus. II-The analysis of tissues of the Victoria plum tree. J Sci Food Agric 10:135–144Google Scholar
  19. Lawson DL, Merritt RW, Klug MJ, Martin JS (1982) The utilization of late season foliage by the orange striped oakworm, Anisota senatoria (J.E. Smith) (Citheroniidae). Entomol Exp Appl, in pressGoogle Scholar
  20. Mandels M, Reese ET (1963) Inhibition of cellulases and β-glucosidases. In: ET Reese (ed), Advances in enzymic hydrolysis of cellulose and related materials. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 115–157Google Scholar
  21. McKey D, Waterman PG, Mbi CN, Gartlan JS, Struhsaker TT (1978) Phenolic content of vegetation in two African rain forests: ecological implications. Science 202:61–64Google Scholar
  22. Moran N, Hamilton WD (1980) Low nutritive quality as a defense against herbivores. J Theor Biol 86:247–254Google Scholar
  23. Oates JF, Waterman PG, Choo GM (1980) Food selection by the South Indian leafmonkey, Presbytis johnii, in relation to leaf chemistry. Oecologia (Berl) 45:45–56Google Scholar
  24. Price ML, Van Scoyoc S, Butler LG (1978) A critical evaluation of the vanillin reaction as an assay for tannin in sorghum grain. J Agric Food Chem 26:1214–1218Google Scholar
  25. Rhoades DF (1979) The antiherbivore chemistry of Larrea In TJ Mabry, JH Hunziker and DR DiFeo (eds). Creosote bush: biology and chemistry of Larrea in New World deserts. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsbourg, Pa, pp 135–175Google Scholar
  26. Rhoades DF, Cates RG (1976) A general theory of plant antiherbivore chemistry. Rec Adv Phytochem 10:168–213Google Scholar
  27. Ribéreau-Gayon P (1972) Plant phenolics. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, xi+201 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. Schultz JC, Baldwin IT, Nothnagle PJ (1981) Hemoglobin as a binding substrate in the quantitative analysis of plant tannins. J Agric Food Chem 29:823–826Google Scholar
  29. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Co, San Francisco, pp 428–440Google Scholar
  30. Sumere CF van, Albrecht J, Dedonder A, de Pooter H, Pé I (1975) Plant protein and phenolics. In: JB Harborne and CF Van Sumere (eds), The chemistry and biochemistry of plant proteins. Academic Press, New York, pp 211–264Google Scholar
  31. Swain T, Hillis WE (1959) The phenolic constitutents of Prunus domestica. I. The quantitative analysis of phenolic constituents. J Sci Food Agric 10:63–68Google Scholar
  32. Swain T (1979a) Tannins and lignins. In GA Rosenthal and DH Janzen (eds) Herbivores: their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, New York, pp 657–682Google Scholar
  33. Swain T (1979b) Phenolics in the environment. Rec Adv Phytochemistry 12:617–640Google Scholar
  34. Waterman PG, Mbi CN, KcKey DB, Gartlan JS (1980) African rainforest vegetation and rumen microbes: phenolic compounds and nutrients as correlates of digestibility. Oecologia (Berl) 47:22–33Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joan Stadler Martin
    • 1
  • Michael M. Martin
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Biological SciencesUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations