, Volume 69, Issue 2, pp 260–267 | Cite as

Sexual differences in morphology and niche utilization in an aquatic snake, Acrochordus arafurae

  • Richard Shine
Original Papers


Filesnakes (Acrochordus arafurae) are large (to 2 m), heavy-bodied snakes of tropical Australia. Sexual dimorphism is evident in adult body sizes, weight/length ratios, and body proportions (relative head and tail lengths). Dimorphism is present even in neonates. Two hypotheses for the evolution of such dimorphism are (1) sexual selection or (2) adaptation of the sexes to different ecological niches. The hypothesis of sexual selection is consistent with general trends of sexually dimorphic body sizes in snakes, and accurately predicts, for A. arafurae, that the larger sex (female) is the one in which reproductive success increases most strongly with increasing body size. However, the sexual dimorphism in relative head sizes is not explicable by sexual selection.

The hypothesis of adaptation to sex-specific niches predicts differences in habitats and/or prey. I observed major differences between male and female A. arafurae in prey types, prey sizes and habitat utilization (shallow versus deep water). Hence, the sexual dimorphism in relative head sizes is attributed to ecological causes rather than sexual selection. Nonetheless, competition between the sexes need not be invoked as the selective advantage of this character divergence. It is more parsimonious to interpret these differences as independent adaptations of each sex to increase foraging success, given pre-existing sexually-selected differences in size, habitat or behavior. Data for three other aquatic snake species, from phylogenetically distant taxa, suggest that sexual dimorphism in food habits, foraging sites and feeding morphology, is widespread in snakes.


Body Size Sexual Selection Sexual Dimorphism Tail Length Food Habit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aleksiuk M, Gregory PT (1974) Regulation of seasonal mating behavior in Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis. Copeia 1974:681–688Google Scholar
  2. Alexander RD, Hoogland JL, Howard RD, Noonan M, Sherman PW (1979) Sexual dimorphism and breeding systems in pinnipeds, ungulates, primates and humans. In: Chagnon NA, Irons W (eds) Evolutionary biology and human social behavior: An anthropological perpective. Duxbury Press, Mass, USA, pp 402–405Google Scholar
  3. Andren C, Nilson G (1981) Reproductive success and risk of predation in normal and melanistic colour morphs of the adder, Vipera berus. Biol J Linn Soc 15:235–246Google Scholar
  4. Andrews RM, Asato T (1977) Energy utilization of a tropical lizard. Comp Biochem Physiol 58A:57–62Google Scholar
  5. Baird RC (1965) Ecological implications of the behaviour of the sexually dimorphic goby Microgobius gulosus (Girard). Publ Inst Mar Sci Univ Texas 10:1–8Google Scholar
  6. Bell HL (1982) Sexual differences in the foraging behaviour of the frill-necked flycatcher Arses telescopthalmus in New Guinea. Aust J Ecol 7:137–147Google Scholar
  7. Berry JF, Shine R (1980) Sexual size dimorphism and sexual selection in turtles (Order Testudines). Oecologia (Berlin) 44:185–191Google Scholar
  8. Bishop KA, Harland WG (1966) Further ecological studies on the freshwater fishes of the Alligator Rivers Region. OSS Research Reports (in press)Google Scholar
  9. Blanchard FN, Blanchard FC (1941) Mating of the garter snake Thamnophis sirtalis sirtalis (Linnaeus). Pap Michigan Acad Sci Arts Lett 27:215–234Google Scholar
  10. Bowen SH (1984) Differential habitat utilisation by sexes of Sarotherodon mossambicus in Lake Valencia, Venezuela: significance for fitness. J Fish Biol 24:115–121Google Scholar
  11. Brown JL (1975) The evolution of behavior. Norton: New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Carothers JH (1984) Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in some herbivorous lizards. Am Nat 124:244–254Google Scholar
  13. Catling PM, Freedman B (1980) Food and feeding behavior of sympatric snakes at Amherstburg, Ontario. Can Field-Nat 94:28–33Google Scholar
  14. Clutton-Brock TH, Harvey PH, Rudder B (1977) Sexual dimorphism, socionomic sex ratio and body weight in primates. Nature 269:797–799Google Scholar
  15. Clutton-Brock TH, Guiness FE, Albon SD (1982) Red deer: behavior and ecology of two sexes. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. Crook JH (1972) Sexual selection, dimorphism, and social organisation in the primates. In: Campbell BG (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of Man. Aldine: Chicago, pp 231–281Google Scholar
  17. Crook JH (1973) Darwinism and the sexual politics of primates. Accad Naz Lincei 182:199–217Google Scholar
  18. Darwin C (1974) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray: LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Davies NB, Halliday TR (1977) Optimal mate selection in the toad Bufo bufo. Nature 269:56–58Google Scholar
  20. Dugan B (1982) The mating behavior of the green iguana, Iguana iguana In: Burghardt GM, Rand AS (eds) Iguanas of the world. Noyes Publ, New Jersey, USA, pp 320–341Google Scholar
  21. Feduccia A, Slaughter BH (1974) Sexual dimorphism in skates (Rajidae) and its possible role in differential niche utilization. Evolution 28:164–168Google Scholar
  22. Finneran LC (1949) A sexual aggregation of the garter snake Thamnophis butleri (Cope). Copeia 1949:141–144Google Scholar
  23. Fitch HS (1956) An ecological study of the collared lizard (Crotaphytus collaris). Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 8:213–274Google Scholar
  24. Fitch HS (1976) Sexual size differences in the mainland anoles. Occas Papers Mus Nat Hist Univ Kansas 50:1–21Google Scholar
  25. Fitch HS (1978) Sexual size differences in the genus Sceloporus. univ Kansas Sci Bull 51:441–461Google Scholar
  26. Fitch HS (1981) Sexual size differences in reptiles. Misc Publ Mus Nat Hist Univ Kansas 70:1–72Google Scholar
  27. Gautier-Hion A (1975) Dimorphisme sexuel et organisation sociale chez les cercopithecines forestiers africains. Mammalia 39:365–374Google Scholar
  28. Ghiselin MT (1974) The economy of nature and the evolution of sex. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  29. Gill E (1871) The eared seals. Amer Natur 4:675–684Google Scholar
  30. Greene HW (1984) Feeding behavior and diet of the eastern coral snake Micrurus fulvius. In: Contributions to vertebrate ecology and systematics: a tribute to Henry S Fitch. Special Publ Univ Kansas Mus Nat Hist, pp 147–162Google Scholar
  31. Harris VA (1964) The life of the rainbow lizard. Hutchinson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Hart BT, McGregor RJ (1980) Limnological survey of eight billabongs in the Magela Creek catchment, Northern Territory. Aust J Mar Freshwater Res 31:611–626Google Scholar
  33. Harvey PH, Kavanagh MJ, Clutton-Brock TH (1978) Sexual dimorphism in primate teeth. J Zool 186:475–486Google Scholar
  34. Harvey RD (1979) Estimating reproductive success in natural populations. Am Nat 114:217–227Google Scholar
  35. Keenlyne KD (1972) Sexual differences in feeding habits of Crotalus horridus horridus. J Herpetol 7:234–237Google Scholar
  36. Keenlyne KD, Beer JR (1974) Food habits of Sistrurus catenatus catenatus. J Herpetol 7:382–384Google Scholar
  37. Kelleway LG (1982) Competition for mates and food items in Vipera berus. Brit J Herpetol 5:225–230Google Scholar
  38. Klauber LM (1943) Tail-length differences in snakes with notes on sexual dimorphism and the coefficient of divergence. Bull Zool Soc San Diego 18:1–60Google Scholar
  39. Lamb T (1984) The influence of sex and breeding condition on microhabitat selection and diet in the pig frog Rana grylio. Am Midl Nat 111:311–318Google Scholar
  40. Legler JM (1960) A simple and inexpensive device for trapping aquatic turtles. Utah Acad Sci Arts Lett 37:63–66Google Scholar
  41. Leutenegger W, Kelly JT (1977) Relationship of sexual dimorphism in canine size and body size to social behavioral and ecological correlates in anthropoid primates. Primates 18:117–136Google Scholar
  42. Mason LG (1977) Prey preferences and ecological sexual dimorphism in Phymata americana Melin. Am Midl Nat 97:293–299Google Scholar
  43. McDowell SB (1975) A catalogue of the snakes of New Guinea and the Solomons, with special reference to those in the Bernice P Bishop Museum. Part II. Anilioidea and Pythoninae. J Herpeteol 9:1–80Google Scholar
  44. McDowell SB (1979) A catalogue of the snakes of New Guinea and the Solomons, with special reference to those in the Bernice P Bishop Museum. Part III Boinae and Acrochordoidea (Reptilia, Serpentes). J Herpetol 13:1–92Google Scholar
  45. McEachran JD (1977) Reply to “sexual dimorphism in skates (Rajidae)”. Evolution 31:218–220Google Scholar
  46. Mushinsky HR, Hebrard JJ, Vodopich DS (1982) Ontogeny of water snake foraging ecology. Ecology 63:1624–1629Google Scholar
  47. Pernetta JC (1977) Observations on the habits and morphology of the sea snake Laticauda colubrina (Schneider) in Fiji. Canad J Zool 55:1612–1619Google Scholar
  48. Pough FH, Groves JD (1983) Specializations of the body form and food habits of snakes. Amer Zool 23:443–454Google Scholar
  49. Reinert HK (1984) Habitat variation within sympatric snake populations. Ecology 65:1673–1682Google Scholar
  50. Reynolds RP, Scott NJ Jr (1982) Use of a mammalian resource by a Chihuahuan desert snake community. In: Scott NJ Jr (ed) Herpetological communities. US Dept of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Wildlife Research Report 13, pp 99–118Google Scholar
  51. Rieppel O (1980) The perilymphatic system of the skull of Typhlops and Acrochordus, with comments on the origin of snakes. J Herpetol 14:105–108Google Scholar
  52. Ruby DE (1981) Phenotypic correlates of male reproductive success in the lizard Sceloporus jarrovi. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW (eds) Natural selection and social behavior. Chiron Press, New York, pp 430–438Google Scholar
  53. Schmidt RJ, Holbrook SJ (1984) Gape-limitation, foraging tactics and prey size selectivity of two microcarnivorous species of fish. Oecologia (Berlin) 63:6–12Google Scholar
  54. Schoener TW (1967) The ecological significance of sexual dimorphism in size in the lizard Anolis conspersus. Science 155:474–476Google Scholar
  55. Schoener TW (1969) Models of optimum size for solitary predators. Amer Natur 103:227–313Google Scholar
  56. Schoener TW (1977) Competition and the niche. In: Gans C, Tinkle DW (eds) Biology of the reptilia, vol 7. Academic Press, London, pp 35–136Google Scholar
  57. Schoener TW, Slade JB, Stinson CH (1982) Diet and sexual dimorphism in the very catholic lizard genus, Leiocephalus of the Bahamas. Oecologia (Berlin) 53:160–169Google Scholar
  58. Selander RK (1966) Sexual dimorphism and differential niche utilization in birds. Condor 68:113–151Google Scholar
  59. Selander RK (1972) Sexual selection and dimorphism in birds. In: Campbell BG (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine: Chicago, pp 180–230Google Scholar
  60. Semlitsch RD, Gibbons JW (1982) Body size dimorphism and sexual selection in two species of water snakes. Copeia 1982:974–976Google Scholar
  61. Seymour RS, Dobson GP, Baldwin P (1981) Respiratory and cardiovascular physiology of the aquatic snake, Acrochordus arafurae. J Comp Physiol 144:215–227Google Scholar
  62. Shine R (1977) Habitats, diet and sympatry in snakes: a study from Australia. Can J Zool 55:1118–1128Google Scholar
  63. Shine R (1978) Sexual size dimorphism and male combat in snakes. Oecologia (Berlin) 33:269–277Google Scholar
  64. Shine R (1979) Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in the Amphibia. Copeia 1979:297–306Google Scholar
  65. Shine R (1980) “Costs” of reproduction in reptiles. Oecologia (Berlin) 46:92–100Google Scholar
  66. Shine R (1986) Ecology of a low energy specialist: food habits and reproductive biology of the Arafura filesnake (Acrochordidae). Copeia 1986:424–437Google Scholar
  67. Shine R, Lambeck R (1985) A radiotelemetric study of movements, thermoregulation and habitat utilization of Arfura filesnakes (Serpentes, Acrochordidae). Herpetologica 41:351–361Google Scholar
  68. Sieb RL (1981) Size and shape in a neotropical burrowing colubrid snake, Geophis nasalis, and its prey. Amer Zool 21:933Google Scholar
  69. Slatkin M (1984) Ecological causes of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:622–630Google Scholar
  70. Smith GC (1976) Ecological energetics of three species of ectothermic vertebrates. Ecology 57:252–264Google Scholar
  71. Spassov NB (1979) Sexual selection and evolution of intraspecific display means in baboons (Primates, Cercopithecidae). CR Acad Bulgare Sci 32:225–228Google Scholar
  72. Stamps JA (1977) The relationship between resource competition, risk and aggression in a tropical territorial lizard. Ecology 58:349–358Google Scholar
  73. Stamps JA (1983) Sexual selection, sexual dimorphism, and territoriality. In: Huey RB, Pianka ER, Schoener TW (eds) Lizard ecology. Harvard University Press, Mass, pp 169–204Google Scholar
  74. Trivers RL (1976) Sexual selection and resource-accruing abilities in Anolis garmani. Evolution 30:253–269Google Scholar
  75. Vitt LJ (1983) Reproduction and sexual dimorphism in the tropical teiid lizard Cnemidophorus ocellifer. Copeia 1983:359–366Google Scholar
  76. Voris HK, Voris HH (1983) Feeding strategies in marine snakes: an analysis of evolutionary, morphological, behavioral, and ecological relationships. Amer Zool 23:411–426Google Scholar
  77. Werner DI (1982) Social organization and ecology of land iguanas, Conolophus subcristatus on Fernandina Island, Galapagos. In: Burghardt GM, Rand AS (eds) Iguanas of the World, Noyes Publ, New Jersey, USA, pp 342–365Google Scholar
  78. Wiley RH (1974) Evolution of social organization and life-history patterns among grouse. Quart Rev Biol 49:201–227Google Scholar
  79. Zar JH (1974) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Shine
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoology AO8University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations