Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Comparison of several methods for the determination of arsenic compounds in water and in urine

Their application for the study of arsenic metabolism and for the monitoring of workers exposed to arsenic

Summary

Several arsenic species (inorganic tri- or pentavalent arsenic, mono-and dimethylated arsonic acids) can be determined in water samples by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry after appropriate acidification procedures (concentrated HCl or a mixture HCl/HClO4/HBr) and extraction by toluene in the presence or absence of KI; the determination of aromatic derivatives and of arsenic thiol complexes needs a wet or dry ashing step. The procedures for water analysis are not directly applicable to urine samples; in the best conditions, total inorganic plus 85% on the average of the methylated arsenicals present in urine are measured after acidification with concentrated HCl and extraction by toluene in the presence of KI. Total arsenic content (including arsenic from marine origin) is measured only after a drastic mineralization step like MgO treatment at 600°C. The results obtained by the electrothermal atomic absorption technique and those obtained by neutron activation analysis are in excellent agreement.

When the presence of arsenic of marine origin is suspected in urine, the analysis of inorganic arsenic and its metabolites is preferably performed by an arsine generation technique. The sum of inorganic arsenic and of its mono and dimethylated derivatives determined by such a technique is identical with the results obtained by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry after complete mineralization of the samples as long as no arsenic from marine origin is present.

After oral ingestion of As2O3 by man, the urinary excretion of inorganic arsenic and its metabolites is important and rapid (approximately 60% are eliminated by the oral route with a half life of 30 h).

While the excretion occurs in the form of inorganic species during the first hours following the ingestion, a methylating process is rapidly triggered and leads to a preponderant excretion of dimethylarsinic acid 1 day after ingestion. In the case of ingestion of seafood containing arsenic, the urinary excretion occurs at a higher rate (half life 18 h) apparently without transformation.

The absence of interference of arsenic from marine origin and the capacity of measuring separately inorganic arsenic and its main urinary metabolites makes the arsine generation technique the best suited for the monitoring of workers exposed to inorganic arsenic. However, since the technique may sometimes be too elaborate and time-consuming for routine work, the biological monitoring of workers can be performed by determining total arsenic concentration in urine after mineralization with MgO. Samples with high arsenic content are then re-analyzed to distinguish between occupational exposure and ingestion of the organic arsenic present in marine organisms. This is carried out either by the arsine generation method or, if this technique is not available, by a direct extraction procedure in the presence of KI of a sample acidified with HCI. With the latter procedure, 85% of the methylated arsenic is measured on average without interference of arsenic from marine origin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Braman RS, Foreback CC (1973) Methylated forms of arsenic in the environment. Science 182:1247–1249

  2. Cooney RV, Mumma RO, Benson AA (1978) Arsoniumphospholipid in algae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:4262–4264

  3. Crecelius EA (1977) Changes in the chemical speciation of arsenic following ingestion by man. Environ Health Perspect 19:147–150

  4. Edmonds JS, Francesconi KA (1977) Methylated arsenic from marine fauna. Nature 265:436

  5. Edmonds JS, Francesconi KA, Cannon JR, Raston CL, Skelton BW, White AH (1977) Isolation crystal structure and synthesis of arsenobetaine, the arsenical constituent of the western rock lobster Panulirus Longipes Cygnus George. Tetrahedron Lett 18:1543–1546

  6. Fischer W, Harre W (1954) Bestimmung von Arsen und Germanium nach ihrer Abtrennung durch Verteilen. Angew Chem [Engl] 66:165–170

  7. Fitchett AW, Daughtrey EH, Mushak P (1975) Quantitative measurements of inorganic and organic arsenic by flameless atomic absorption spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 79:93–99

  8. Freeman HC, Uthe JF, Fleming RB, Odense PH, Ackman RG, Landry G, Musial C (1979) Clearance of arsenic ingested by man from arsenic contaminated fish. Bull Environ Contain Toxicol 22:224–229

  9. Lauwerys R, Buchet JP, Roels H (1979) The determination of trace levels of arsenic in human biological materials. Arch Toxicol 41:239–247

  10. Mappes R (1977) Versuche zur Ausscheidung von Arsen im Urin. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 40:267–272

  11. Penrose WR (1974) Arsenic in the marine and aquatic environments: analysis, occurrence, and significance. Crit Rev Environ Control 5:465–482

  12. Peoples SA, Lakso J, Lais T (1971) The simultaneous determination of methyl arsonic acid and inorganic arsenic in urine. Proc West Pharmacol Soc 14:178–182

  13. Pinto SS, Varner MO, Nelson MA, Labbe AL, White LD (1976) Arsenic trioxide absorption and excretion in industry. J Occup Med 18:677–680

  14. Smith TJ, Crecelius EA, Reading JC (1977) Airborne As exposure and excretion of methylated As compounds. Environ Health Perspect 19:89–93

  15. Talmi Y, Bostick DT (1975) The determination of arsenic and arsenicals. J Chromatogr Sci 13:231–237

  16. Uthe JF, Freeman HC, Johnston JR, Michalik P (1974) Comparison of wet ashing and dry ashing for the determination of arsenic in marine organisms, using methylated arsenicals for standards. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 57:1363–1365

  17. Vasak V, Sedivec V (1952) Colorimetric determination of arsenic. Chem Listy 46:341–344

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to J. P. Buchet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buchet, J.P., Lauwerys, R. & Roels, H. Comparison of several methods for the determination of arsenic compounds in water and in urine. Int. Arch Occup Environ Heath 46, 11–29 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377456

Download citation

Key words

  • Trivalent arsenic
  • Pentavalent arsenic
  • Monomethylarsonic acid
  • Cacodylic acid
  • Metabolism
  • Man
  • Biological monitoring