Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 74, Issue 1, pp 55–61 | Cite as

Host-plant selection, diet diversity, and optimal foraging in a tropical leafcutting ant

  • L. L. Rockwood
  • S. P. Hubbell
Original Papers

Summary

A month-long study was conducted on the comparative foraging behavior of 20 colonies of the leafcutting ant, Atta cephalotes L. in Santa Rosa National Park, Guanacaste Province, Costa Rica. The study was conducted during the middle of the wet season, when trees had mature foliage and the ants were maximally selective among species of potential host plants. The colonies always gathered leaves from more than a single tree species but on average one species constituted almost half the diet with the remaining species being of geometrically decreasing importance. Colonies exhibited greater diversity in their choice of leaves and lower constancy of foraging when the average quality of resource trees was lower, as predicted by elementary optimal foraging theory. Furthermore, the ants were more selective of the species they attacked at greater distances from the nest. However, the ants sometimes did not attack apparently palatable species, and often did not attack nearby individuals of species they were exploiting at greater distances.

A classical explanation for why leafcutting ants exploit distant host trees when apparently equally good trees are nearer, is that the ants are pursuing a strategy of conserving resources to avoid long-term overgrazing pressure on nearby trees. We prefer a simpler hypothesis: (1) Trees of exploited species exhibit individual variation in the acceptability of their leaves to the ants. (2) The abundance of a species will generally increase with area and radial distance from the nest, so the probability that at least one tree of the species will be acceptable to the ants also increases with distance. (3) The ants forage using a system of trunk-trails cleared of leaf litter, which significantly reduces their travel time to previously discovered, high-quality resource trees (by a factor of 4- to 10-fold). (4) Foragers are unware of the total pool of resources available to the colony. Therefore once scouts have chanced upon a tree which is acceptable, the colony will concentrate on harvesting from that tree rather than searching for additional sources of leaves distant from the established trail.

Key words

Atta cephalotes Foraging Costa Rica 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blanton CM, Ewel JJ (1985) Leaf-cutting ant herbivory in successional and agricultural tropical ecosystems. Ecology 66:861–869Google Scholar
  2. Bowers MA, Porter SD (1981) Effect of foraging distance on water content of substrates harvested by Atta colombica (Guerin). Ecology 62:273–275Google Scholar
  3. Chen TK, Ales DC, Baenziger NC, Wiemer DF (1983) Ant-repellent triterpenoids from Cordia alliodora. J Org Chem 48:3525–3531Google Scholar
  4. Cherrett JM (1968) The foraging behavior of Atta cephalotes L (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) I Foraging pattern and plant species attacked in tropical rain forest. J Anim Ecol 41:647–660Google Scholar
  5. Cherrett JM (1972) Some factors involved in the selection of vegetable substrate by Atta cephalotes (L) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in tropical rain forest J Anim Ecol 41:647–660Google Scholar
  6. Cherrett JM (1983) Resource conservation by the leaf-cutting ant Atta cephalotes in tropical rain forest. In: Sutton SL, Whitmore TC, Chadwick, AC (eds) Tropical rain forest: ecology and management. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK, pp 253–263Google Scholar
  7. Fowler HG, Stiles EW (1980) Conservative resource management by leaf-cutting ants? The role of foraging territories and trails and environmental patchiness. Sociobiology 5:24–41Google Scholar
  8. Haukioja E, Niemela P (1979) Birch leaves as a resource for herbivores: seasonal occurrence of increased resistance in foliage after mechanical damage of adjacent leaves. Oecologia (Berlin) 39:151–159Google Scholar
  9. Holdridge LR (1967) Life Zone Ecology, 2nd Edition, Tropical Science Center, San Jose, Costa Rica, pp 124Google Scholar
  10. Howard JJ (1985) The effect of leaf characteristics on host-plant selection by the leafcutting ant, Atta cephalotes. L Ph D thesis, Univ of Iowa, Iowa City, IowaGoogle Scholar
  11. Hubbell SP, Wiemer DF (1983) Host plant selection by an attine ant. In: P Jaisson (ed) Social insects in the tropics, vol 2: 135–154 University of Paris Press, ParisGoogle Scholar
  12. Hubbell SP, Weimer DF, Adejare A (1983) An antifungal terpenoid defends a neotropical tree (Hymenaea) against attack by fungus-growing ants (Atta). Oecologia (Berlin) 60:321–327Google Scholar
  13. Hubbell SP, Howard JJ, Wiermer DF (1984) Chemical leaf repellency to an attine ant: seasonal distribution among potential host plant species. Ecology 65:1067–1076Google Scholar
  14. Janzen DH, Leisner R (1980) Annotated check-list of plants of lowland Guanacaste province, Costa Rica, exclusive of grasses and non-vascular cryptogams. Brenesia 18:15–90Google Scholar
  15. Krebs JR, Cowie RF (1976) Foraging strategies in birds. Ardea 64:98–116Google Scholar
  16. Littledyke M, Cherrett JM (1976) Direct ingestion of plant sap from cut leaves by the leaf-cutting ants Atta cephalotes (L) and Acromyrmex octospinosus (Reich) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Bull Ent Res 68:263–271Google Scholar
  17. Lugo AE, Farnsworth EG, Pool DG, Jerez P, Kaufman G (1973) The impact of the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica on the energy flow of a tropical wet forest. Ecology 54:1292–1301Google Scholar
  18. Pielou EC (1969) An introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley Inter Sci, New York, p 286Google Scholar
  19. Rockwood LL (1972) Animal-plant interactions in a seasonal tropical environment. Ph D Thesis, Univ of Chicago, p 224Google Scholar
  20. Rockwood LL (1973) Distribution, density and dispersion of two species of Atta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Guanacaste Province, Costa Rica J Anim Ecol 42:803–817Google Scholar
  21. Rockwood LL (1975) The effects of seasonality on foraging of two species of leaf-cutting ants (Atta) in Guanacaste Province, Costa Rica Biotropica 7:176–193Google Scholar
  22. Rockwood LL (1976) Plant selection and foraging patterns in two species of leaf-cutting ants (Atta) Ecology 57:48–61Google Scholar
  23. Rockwood LL (1977) Foraging patterns and plant selection in Costa Rican leaf-cutting ants. New York Ent Soc 85:222–233Google Scholar
  24. Rockwood LL, Glander KE (1979) Howling monkeys and leaf-cutting ants: comparative foraging in a tropical deciduous forest. Biotropica 11:1–10Google Scholar
  25. Schultz JC, Baldwin IT (1982) Oak leaf quality declines in response to defoliation by gypsy moth larvae. Science 217:149–151Google Scholar
  26. Shepherd JD (1982) Trunk trails and the searching strategy of a leaf-cutter ant, Atta colombica. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:77–84Google Scholar
  27. Shepherd JD (1985) Adjusting foraging effort to resources in adjacent colonies of the leaf-cutter ant, Atta colombica. Biotropica 17:245–252Google Scholar
  28. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Freeman, San Francisco, pp 776Google Scholar
  29. Stradling DJ (1978) The influence of size on foraging in the ant, Atta cephalotes, and the effect of some plant defence mechanisms. J Anim Ecol 47:173–188Google Scholar
  30. Waller DA (1982a) Leaf-cutting ants and avoided plants: defenses against Atta texana attack. Oecologia (Berlin) 52:400–403Google Scholar
  31. Waller DA (1982b) Leaf-cutting ants and live oak: the role of leaf toughness in seasonal and intraspecific host choice. Ent Exp and Appl 32:145–150Google Scholar
  32. Waller DA (1982c) Foraging ecology of the Texas leaf-cutting ant, Atta texana Buckley (Formicidae; Attini): host choice and forager size polymorphism. PhD Dissertation, University of Texas, AustinGoogle Scholar
  33. Wiemer DF, Ales DC (1981) Lasidiol angelate: ant repellent sesquiterpenoid from Lasianthea fruticosa. J Organic Chem 46:5449–5450Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. L. Rockwood
    • 1
  • S. P. Hubbell
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiologyGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.Program in Evolutionary Ecology and Behavior, Department of BiologyUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations