Oecologia

, Volume 71, Issue 1, pp 25–28 | Cite as

The influence of the frequency of periodic disturbances on the maintenance of phytoplankton diversity

  • A. Gaedeke
  • U. Sommer
Original Papers

Abstract

The influence of periodic disturbances of various frequency on the maintenance of the phytoplankton diversity was studied by semicontinuous competition experiments. Disturbances consisted of dilution events, which meant both addition of fresh nutrients and elimination of organisms. The intervals between dilution events varied from 1 to 14 days. Diversity was found to increase with increasing intervals between disturbances. coexisting species belonged to different strategy types: (a) species with rapid growth under enriched conditions, (b) species with good competitive abilities under impoverished conditions, (c) species with the ability to build up storage pools of the limiting nutrient. An increase of the number of coexisting species over the number that would have coexisted in steady state was only found when the interval exceeded one generation time.

Key words

Diversity Disturbances Nutrient pulses Population reductions Varying frequency and intensity Growth strategies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong RA, McGehee R (1977) Competitive exclusion. Am Nat 115:151–170Google Scholar
  2. Conell J (1978) Diversity in tropical rainforests and coral reefs. Science 199:1304–1310Google Scholar
  3. Droop MR (1968) Vitamin B12 and marine biology. IV. The kinetics of uptake, growth, and inhibition in Monochrysis lutheri. J Mar Biol Ass U K 48:689–733Google Scholar
  4. Droop MR (1983) 25 years of algal growth kinetics. Bot Marina 26:99–112Google Scholar
  5. Hutchinson GE (1961) The paradox of the plankton. Am Nat 95:137–145Google Scholar
  6. Kilham SS (1984) Silicon and phosphorus growth kinetics and competitive interactions between Stephanodiscus minutus and Synedra sp. Verh internat Verein Limnol 22:435–439Google Scholar
  7. Kilham SS (1986) Dynamics of Lake Michigan natural phytoplankton communities in continuous cultures along a Si: P loading gradient. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 43:351–360Google Scholar
  8. Monod J (1950) La technique de la culture continue: theorie et applications. Ann Inst Pasteur Lille 79:390–410Google Scholar
  9. Müller H (1972) Wachstum und Phosphatbedarf von Nitzschia actinastroides in statischer und homokontinuierlicher Kultur unter Phosphatlimitierung. Arch Hydrobiol Suppl 33:206–236Google Scholar
  10. Robinson JV, Sandgren CD (1983) The effect of temporal environmental heterogeneity on community structure: a replicated experimental study. Oecologia 57:98–112Google Scholar
  11. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. Univ Illinois PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Sommer U (1983) Nutrient competition between phytoplankton species in multispecies chemostat experiments. Arch Hydrobiol 96:399–416Google Scholar
  13. Sommer U (1984) The paradox of the plankton: Fluctuations of the phosphorus availability maintain diversity of phytoplankton in flow-through cultures. Limnol Oceanogr 29:633–636Google Scholar
  14. Sommer U (1985) Comparison between steady state and non-steady state competition: Experiments with natural phytoplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 30:335–346Google Scholar
  15. Stewart FM, Levin BR (1973) Partitioning of the resources and the outcome of interspecific competition: A model and general considerations. Am Nat 107:171–198Google Scholar
  16. Tilman D (1977) Resource competition between planktonic algae: An experimental and theoretical approach. Ecology 58:338–348Google Scholar
  17. Tilman D (1981) Test of resource competition theory using four species of Lake Michigan algae. Ecology 62:802–815Google Scholar
  18. Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton Univ PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Gaedeke
    • 1
  • U. Sommer
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of LimnologyUniversity of KonstanzKonstanzGermany
  2. 2.Max Planck Institute of LimnologyPlönGermany

Personalised recommendations