Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Carrying food items to cover for consumption: the behavior of ten bird species feeding under the risk of predation

  • 218 Accesses

  • 57 Citations

Summary

In earlier work (Lima et al. 1985; Lima 1985), we found that gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) and black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus) when exploiting a patch of food in the open often carried individual food items to protective cover for consumption. Their tendency to carry (i) decreased as distance of the patch from cover increased, and (ii) increased as size of the available food items increased. A simple model indicated that this behavior was consistent with a trade-off between efficient foraging and predation risk. Maximal feeding efficiency was achieved by always eating at the patch, whereas minimal time exposure to predators was achieved by carrying all items to cover for consumption. Because predation-riskrelated trade-offs are likely to be of importance in the determination of feeding behavior, we surveyed the behavior of 10 bird species feeding under similar conditions to assess both the generality of the above results and the adequacy of some simple assumptions concerning the assessment and perception of predation risk.

We observed considerable interspecific variability in behavior. Of the 10 species studied, 4 behaved in a manner similar to the squirrels and chickadees. Five other species showed an increased tendency to carry with larger items but no clear tendency to decrease carrying from longer distances. The one remaining species exhibited neither behavioral trend.

The model that predicted squirrel and chickadee behavior failed to account for all observed behavior. The behavior of all species, however, was influenced by predation risk, and the discrepancy between theory and observation most likely reflects shortcomings of the model. These discrepancies indicate that other factors, in addition to exposure time, may be of significance in the perception of predation risk by several (or all) of the species studied. Of particular importance may be a distance-dependent probability of escaping attack. Other results indicate that predation risk may influence handling times via aspects of the digestive process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Barnard CJ (1980) Flock feeding and time budgets in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus L.). Anim Behav 28:295–309

  2. Brody S (1945) Bioenergetics and growth. Reinhold Publ Corp NY

  3. Calow P (1977) Ecology, evolution and energetics-study in metabolism. Biol Revs 52:385–409

  4. Caraco T, Martindale S, Pulliam HR (1980) Avian time budgets and distance to cover. Auk 97:872–875

  5. Dill LM, Fraser AGH (1985) Risk of predation and the feeding behavior of juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:65–71

  6. Fraser DF, Cerri RD (1982) Experimental evaluation of predatorprey relationships in a patchy environment: consequences for habitat use patterns in minnows. Ecology 63:307–313

  7. Fretwell SD (1972) Populations in a seasonal environment. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

  8. Fritz JC (1937) The effect of feeding grit on digestibility in the domestic fowl. Poultry Sci 16:75–79

  9. Gilliam, JF (1982) Habitat use and competitive bottlenecks in sizestructured fish populations. Ph D thesis, Michigan State University

  10. Grubb TC, Greenwald L (1982) Sparrows and a brushpile: foraging responses to different combinations of predation risk and energy cost. Anim Behav 30:637–640

  11. Kendeigh SC (1944) Effect of air temperature on the rate of energy metabolism in the English Sparrow. J Exp Zool 96:1–16

  12. Kendeigh SC (1949) Effect of temperature and season on energy resources of the English Sparrow. Auk 66:113–127

  13. Kotler BP (1984a) Risk of predation and the structure of desert rodent communities. Ecology 65:689–701

  14. Kotler BP (1984b) Harvesting rates and predatory risk in desert rodents: a comparison of two communities on different continents. J Mamm 65:91–96

  15. Krebs JR (1980) Optimal foraging, predation risk, and territory defence. Ardea 68:83–90

  16. Lima SL (1985) Maximizing feeding efficiency and minimizing time exposed to predators: a trade-off in the black-capped chickadee. Oecologia (Berlin) 66:60–67

  17. Lima SL (1986) Predation risk and unpredictable feeding conditions: determinants of body mass in birds. Ecology 67:377–385

  18. Lima SL (1987) Distance to cover, visual obstructions and vigilance in house sparrows. Behaviour (in press)

  19. Lima SL, Valone TJ (1986) Influence of predation risk on diet selection: a simple example in the grey squirrel. Anim Behav 34:536–544

  20. Lima SL, Valone TJ, Caraco T (1985) Foraging-efficiency-predation-risk trade-off in the grey squirrel. Anim Behav 33:155–165

  21. Lockard RB, Owings DH (1974) Moon-related surface activity of bannertail (Dipodomys spectabilis) and fresno (D nitratoides) kangaroo rats. Anim Behav 22:262–273

  22. McNamara JM, Houston AI (1986) The common currency for behavioral decisions. Am Nat 127:358–378

  23. Milinski M, Heller R (1978) Influence of a predator on the optimal foraging behaviour of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L). Nature 275:642–644

  24. Mittelbach GG (1981) Foraging efficiency and body size: a study of optimal diet and habitat use by bluegills. Ecology 62:1370–1386

  25. Mittelbach GG (1984) Predation and resource partitioning in two sunfishes (Centrarchidae). Ecology 65:499–513

  26. Murie A (1951) Coyote food habits on a southwestern cattle range. J Mamm 32:291–295

  27. Phelan FJS, Robertson RJ (1978) Predatory responses of a raptor guild to changes in prey density. Can J Zool 56:2565–2572

  28. Power ME (1984) Depth distributions of armored catfish: predator-induced resource avoidance. Ecology 65:523–528

  29. Pulliam HR, Mills GS (1977) The use of space by wintering sparrows. Ecology 58:1393–1399

  30. Schneider KJ (1984) Dominance, predation, and optimal foraging in white-throated sparrow flocks. Ecology 65:1820–1827

  31. Sih A (1982) Foraging strategies and the avoidance of predation by an aquatic insect, Notonecta hoffmanni. Ecology 63:786–796

  32. Werner EE, Gilliam JF, Hall DJ, Mittelbach GG (1983) An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology 64:1540–1548

  33. Ydenberg RC, Dill LM (1986) The economics of fleeing from predators. Adv Study Behav 16:229–249

  34. Zimmerman JL (1965) Digestive efficiency and premigratory obesity in the Dickcissel. Auk 82:278–279

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to T. J. Valone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valone, T.J., Lima, S.L. Carrying food items to cover for consumption: the behavior of ten bird species feeding under the risk of predation. Oecologia 71, 286–294 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377297

Download citation

Key words

  • Predation risk
  • Food consumption
  • Birds