Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Weight loss, reproductive output, and the cost of reproduction in the common frog, Rana temporaria

Summary

The consequences of reproduction for body weight, growth and survival were studied in a Swiss population of the explosive breeder, Rana temporaria. Males and females continuously loss weight in the range of 0.5% of total body weight per day from the breeding migration throughout May. Females also lost about 33% (1983) and 29% (1984) due to spawning. In addition to this significant year-to-year variation, there was also considerable individual variation in reproductive output. Skeletochronological techniques indicated that breeding male or female frogs experienced a growth reduction of several millimeters relative to non-breeding frogs of the same body size. There was no relationship between an individual female's reproductive output in consecutive years or with her subsequent growth or survival. It was concluded that weight loss is caused by a seasonally elevated metabolism in combination with a lack of feeding and represents a basic energetic cost of reproduction, resulting in lowered growth. Individual variation in relative reproductive output is mostly environmentally induced and is not an expression of different reproductive strategies. This may explain the lack of trade-offs that are predicted by the cost-of-reproduction-hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Arak A (1983) Male-male competition and mate choice in anuran amphibians. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 181–210

  2. Bell G, Koufopanou V (1986) The cost of reproduction. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 3:83–131

  3. Caldwell JP (1987) Demography and life history of two species of Chorus frogs (Anura: Hylidae) in South Carolina. Copeia 1987:114–127

  4. Cooke AS (1981) Amphibian growth rates. Brit J Herp 6:179–180

  5. Emlen ST (1976) Lek organization and mating strategies in the bullfrog. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1:283–313

  6. Fromm PO, Johanson RE (1955) the respiratory metabolism of frogs as related to season. J Cell Comp Physiol 45:343–359

  7. Gibbons MM, McCarthy TK (1986) The reproductive output of frogs Rana temporaria (L.) with particular reference to body size and age. J Zool (Lond.) A 209:579–593

  8. Given MF (1988) Growth rate and the cost of calling activity in male carpenter frogs, Rana virgatipes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:153–160

  9. Grossenbacher K (1980) Beitrag zur Populationsdynamik des Grasfrosches Rana temporaria, nebst Bemerkungen zur Erdkröte Bufo bufo (Amphibia, Anura). Jb nat hist Mus Bern 7:177–193

  10. Hellbernd L (1987) Zweijährige Untersuchungen am Laichplatz vom Moorfrosch (Rana arvalis Nilsson) und vom Grasfrosch Rana temporaria L.). In: Glandt D, Podloucky R (eds) Der Moorfrosch—Metelener Artenschutzsymposium. Beih Schriftenr Naturschulz Landschaftspfl Niedersachsen 19:119–130

  11. Hintermann U (1984) Populationsdynamische Untersuchungen an Grasfrosch Rana temporaria Linnaeus, 1758. Salamandra 20:143–166

  12. Howard RD (1981) Sexual dimorphism in bullfrogs. Ecology 62:303–310

  13. Juszczyk W, Obrzut K, Zamachowski W (1966) Morphological changes in the alimentary canal of the common frog (Rana temporaria L.) in the annual cycle. Acta Biol Cracov, Ser Zool 9:239–246

  14. Kaplan RH (1987) Developmental plasticity and maternal effects of reproductive characteristics in the frog, Bombina orientalis. Oecologia (Berlin) 71:273–279

  15. Kminiak M (1978) Food composition of certain amphibians at the beginning of their seasonal activity. Acta fac rer nat Univ Comenianae, Zool 23:105–114

  16. Koskela P, Pasanen S (1974) The wintering of the common frog, Rana temporaria L., in northern Finland. Aquilo, Ser Zool 15:1–17

  17. Koskela P, Pasanen S (1975) The reproductive biology of the female common frog, Rana temporaria L., in northern Finland. Aquilo, Ser Zool 16:1–12

  18. Pasanen S, Koskela P (1974) Seasonal and age variation in the metabolism of the common frog, Rana temporaria L., in northern Finland. Comp Biochem Physiol 47A:635–654

  19. Reznick D (1985) Costs of reproduction: an evaluation of the empirical evidence Oikos 44:257–267

  20. Riedwyl H (1978) Angewandte mathematische Statistik in Wissenschaft, Administration und Technik. Paul Haupt, Bern Stuttgart

  21. Robertson JGM (1986) Male territoriality, fighting and assessment of fighting ability in the Australian frog Uperoleia rugosa. Anim Behav 34:763–772

  22. Ryan MJ (1985) The Tungara frog. Chicago University Press, Chicago

  23. Ryser J (1986) Altersstruktur, Geschlechterverhältnis und Dynamik einer Grasfrosch-Population (Rana temporaria L.) aus der Schweiz. Zool Anz 217:234–251

  24. Ryser J (1988a) Determination of growth and maturation in the common frog, Rana temporaria, by skeletochronology. J Zool (Lond.)

  25. Ryser J (1988b) Clutch parameters in a Swiss population of Rana temporaria. Herp J

  26. Ryser J (1989) The breeding migration and mating system of a Swiss population of the common frog Rana temporaria. Amphibia-Reptilia (in press)

  27. Seigel RA, Huggins MM, Ford NB (1987) Reduction in locomotor ability as a cost of reproduction in gravid snakes. Oecologia (Berlin) 73:481–485

  28. Shine R (1980) “Costs” of reproduction in reptiles. Oecologia (Berlin) 46:92–100

  29. Smith CL (1950) Seasonal changes in blood sugar, fat body, liver glycogen and gonads in the common frog, Rana temporaria. J Exp Biol 26:412–429

  30. Stearns SC (1976) Life-history tactics: A review of the ideas. Quart Rev Biol 51:3–47

  31. Sullivan B (1982) Sexual selection in Woodhouse's toads, Bufo woodhousei. I. Chorus organization. Anim Behav 30:680–686

  32. Tuomi J, Hakala T, Haukioja E (1983) Alternative concepts of reproductive effort, costs of reproduction, and selection in life-history evolution. Am Zool 23:25–34

  33. Wells KD (1977) Territoriality and male mating success in the green frog Rana clamitans. Ecology 58:750–762

  34. Wells KD (1978) Territoriality in the green frog (Rana clamitans). Vocalizations and agonistic behavior. Anim Behav 26:1051–1063

  35. Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  36. Woolbright LL (1983) Sexual selection and size dimorphism in anuran amphibians. Am Nat 121:110–119

  37. Zamachowski W (1968) Changes in the water content in the organism of the common frog (Rana temporaria L.) and the water frog (Rana esculenta L.) in the annual cycle. Acta Biol Cracov, Ser Zool 11:213–225

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ryser, J. Weight loss, reproductive output, and the cost of reproduction in the common frog, Rana temporaria . Oecologia 78, 264–268 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377165

Download citation

Key words

  • Body weight
  • Reproductive strategies
  • Cost of reproduction
  • Rana temporaria