Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 70, Issue 1, pp 77–84 | Cite as

Responses of Neodiprion sertifer (Hym., Diprionidae) larvae to variation in needle resin acid concentration in Scots pine

  • Stig Larsson
  • Christer Björkman
  • Rolf Gref
Original Papers

Summary

We have studied how differences in needle resin acid concentrations between two clones of Scots pine influenced larval survival, larval developmental time, and cocoon weight in Neodiprion sertifer. Larvae were reared under controlled conditions in the laboratory on needles showing a three-fold difference, in resin acid concentration. Larval developmental time was significantly longer for larvae fed needles high in resin acids. No significant differences were found in cocoon weight. Larvae fed needles high in resin acids suffered significantly higher mortality, most of which occurred, in the first two instars. Data on relative growth rate for last-instar larvae, based on a traditional growth efficiency experiment, did not show any negative effects of resin acids, indicating that a possible induction takes place during early instars. Observations on the feeding behaviour of last-instar larvae, the high consumption of bark tissue (with high concentrations of resin acids) by larvae fed needles low in resin acids and preference for needle tissues high in resin acids, indicate that these larvae might actively search for tissues rich in resin acids. We conclude that the physiology and behaviour of N. sertifer has been shaped, in part, by the conflict between the negative effects of resin acids, primarily in early instars (longer developmental time with a corresponding increase in exposure to natural enemies and an increase in direct mortality), and the positive effect of resin acids in later instars (a need for resin acids for use in its own predator defence secretion).

Key words

Larval performance Needle chemistry Nutritional indices Feeding behaviour 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benz G (1974) Negative Rückkoppelung durch Raum- und, Nahrungskonkurrenz sowie zyklische Veränderungen der Nahrungsgrundlage als Regelprinzip in der Populationsdynamik des Grauen Lärchenwicklers, Zeiraphera diniana (Guenée) (Lep., Tortricidae). Z angew. Ent 76:196–228Google Scholar
  2. Berg B, Staaf H (1980) Decomposition rate and chemical changes of Scots pine needle litter. I. The influence of stand age. In: Persson T (ed) Structure and function of northern coniferous forests—an ecosystem study. Ecol Bull (Stockholm) 32:363–372Google Scholar
  3. Berg, B, Hannus K, Popoff T, Theander O (1982) Changes in, organic-chemical components during decomposition in a Scots pine forest. I. Can J Bot 60:1310–1319Google Scholar
  4. Bernays EA (1981) Plant tannins and insect herbivores: an appraisal. Ecol Ent 6:353–360Google Scholar
  5. Brattsten LB (1979) Biochemical defense mechanisms in herbivores against plant allelochemicals. In: Rosenthal GA, Janzen DH (eds) Herbivores: their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, New York, pp 199–270Google Scholar
  6. Brattsten LB, Wilkinson CF, Eisner T (1977), Herbivore-plant interactions: mixed-function oxidases and secondary plant substances. Science 196:1349–1352Google Scholar
  7. Bridgen MR (1979) Genetic variation of Scots pine oleoresin physiology. Thesis. Michigan State University, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Bridgen MR, Hanover JW (1982) Genetic variation in oleoresin physiology of Scots pine. Forest Sci 28:582–589Google Scholar
  9. Bryant JP, Chapin FS, Klein DR (1983) Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation, to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40:357–368Google Scholar
  10. Coley PD (1980) Effects of, leaf age and plant life history patterns on herbivory. Nature 284:545–546Google Scholar
  11. Dowd PF, Smith CM, Sparks TC (1983) Detoxification of plant toxins by insects. Insect Biochem 13:453–468Google Scholar
  12. Edmunds GF, Alstad DN (1981) Responses of black pineleaf scales to host plant variability. In: Deuno RF, Dingle H (eds) Insect life history patterns. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 29–38Google Scholar
  13. Edwards PB, Wightman JA (1984) Energy and nitrogen budget for larval and adult Paropsis charybdis Stal (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) feeding on Eucalyptus viminals. Oecologia (Berlin) 61:302–310Google Scholar
  14. Eichhorn O (1983) Untersuchungen zur Ökologie der Gemeinen Kiefern-Buschhornblattwespe, Diprion pini (L) (Hym, Diprionidae). VIII. Verlauf der Massenvermehrung bei Speyer (Pfalz) 1976–1978. z angew Ent 96:291–303Google Scholar
  15. Eisner T, Johnessee JS, Carrel J, Hendry LB, Meinwald J (1974) Defensive use by an insect of a plant resin. Science 184:996–999Google Scholar
  16. Feeny P (1976) Plant apparency and chemical defense. Rec Adv Phytochem 10:1–40Google Scholar
  17. Flower-Ellis J, Albrektsson A, Olsson L (1976) Structure and growth of some young Scots pine stands: (1) Dimensional and numerical relationships. Swed Conif For Proj Tech Rep 15Google Scholar
  18. Fogal WH (1974) Nutritive value of pine foliage for some Diprionid sawflies. Proc Ent Soc Ont 105:101–118Google Scholar
  19. Gershenzon J (1984) Changes in the levels of plant secondary metabolites under water and nutrient stress. Rec Adv Phytochem 18:273–320Google Scholar
  20. Ghent AW (1960) A study of the group-feeding behaviour of larvae of the Jack pine sawfly, Neodiprion pratti banksianae. Roh Behaviour 16:110–148Google Scholar
  21. Gref R (1982) Diterpenoids and some water-soluble compounds of Pinus sylvestris and their possible relationship to resistance to fungal parasites. Thesis, Swed Univ Agric Sci, Umeå, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  22. Gref R, Ericsson A (1985) Wound-induced changes of resin acid concentrations in living bark of Scots pine seedlings. Can J For Res 15:92–96Google Scholar
  23. Griffiths KJ (1959) Observations on the European pine sawfly, Neodiprion sertifer (Geoff), and its parasites in southern Ontario. Can Ent 91: 501–512Google Scholar
  24. Grimalskij VI (1961) The causes of the resistance of pine stands to needle-eating pests. Zool Zh 40:1656–1664Google Scholar
  25. Hanover JW (1975) Physiology of tree resistance to insects. Ann Rev Ent 20:75–95Google Scholar
  26. Hanski I, Parviainen P (1985) Cocoon predation by small mammals, and pine sawfly population dynamics. Oikos 45:125–136Google Scholar
  27. Hard JS (1976) Natural control of hemlock sawfly, Neodiprion tsugae (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae), populations in southeast Alaska. Can Ent 108:485–498Google Scholar
  28. Haukioja E, Suomela J, Neuvonen S (1985) Long-term inducible resistance in birch foliage: triggering cues and efficacy on a defoliator. Oecologia (Berlin) 65:363–369Google Scholar
  29. Henson WR (1965) Individual rearing of the larvae of Neodiprion sertifer (Geoffroy) (Hymenoptera; Diprionidae). Can Ent 97:773–779Google Scholar
  30. Ikeda T, Matsumura F, Benjamin DM (1977) Mechanism of feeding discrimination between matured and juvenile foliage by two species of pine sawflies. J Chem Ecol 3:677–694Google Scholar
  31. Juutinen P (1967) Zur Bionomie und zum Vorkommen, der roten Kiefernbuschhornblattwespe (Neodiprion sertifer Geoffr) in Finnland den Jahren 1959–1965. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae 63, p 129Google Scholar
  32. Kalin M, Knerer G (1977) Group and mass effects in diprionid sawflies. Nature 267:427–429Google Scholar
  33. Kangas E (1941) Beitrag zur Biologie und Gradation von Diprion sertifer Geoffr (Hym, Tenthredinidae). Ann ent Fenn 7:1–31Google Scholar
  34. Kapler JE, Benjamin DM (1960) The biology and ecology of the red-pine sawfly in Wisconsin. Forest Sci 6:253–268Google Scholar
  35. Kay M (1983) Resistance of Douglas fir to Pseudocoremia suavis. New Zeal J For Sci 13:46–52Google Scholar
  36. Kutney JP, Sing M, Hewitt G, Salisbury PJ, Worth BR, Servizi JA, Martens DW, Gordon RW (1981) Studies related to biological detoxification of kraft pulp mill effluent. I. The biodegradation of dehydroabietic acid with Mortierella isabellina. Can J Chem 59:2334–2341Google Scholar
  37. Larsson S (1985) Seasonal changes in the within-crown distribution of the aphid Cinara pini on Scots pine. Oikos 45:217–222Google Scholar
  38. Larsson S, Tenow O (1979) Utilization of dry matter and bioelements in larvae of Neodiprion sertifer Geoffr (Hym, Diprionidae) feeding on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). Oecologia (Berlin) 43:157–172Google Scholar
  39. Larsson S, Tenow O (1984) Areal distribution of a Neodiprion sertifer (Hym, Diprionidae) outbreak on Scots pine as related to stand condition. Holarctic Ecol 7:81–90Google Scholar
  40. Lyons LA (1964) The European pine sawfly, Neodiprion sertifer (Geoffr) (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae). A review with emphasis on studies in Ontario. Proc Entomol Soc Ont 94:5–37Google Scholar
  41. Martin MM, Rockholm DC, Martin JS (1985) Effects of surfactants, pH, and certain cations on precipitation of proteins by tannins. J Chem Ecol 11:485–494Google Scholar
  42. Mattson WJ (1980) Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11:119–161Google Scholar
  43. Mattson WJ, Slocum SS, Koller CN (1983) Spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana) performance in relation to foliar chemistry of its host plant. In: Proc Forest Defoliator-Host interactions: A comparison between Gypsy moth and spruce budworms. USDA Forest Service, Gen Tech Rep NE-85, pp 55–67Google Scholar
  44. McLeod JM (1970) The epidemiology of the Swaine jack-pine sawfly, Neodiprion swainei. Mid For Chron 46:126–133Google Scholar
  45. Nakamura H (1980) Laval aggregation in the European pine sawfly Neodiprion sertifer. Bull of Joto Gahnen Women's Jr Col 10:73–87Google Scholar
  46. Nakamura H, Morimoto N (1980) A study of weight and size of, cocoon and adult fecundity in Neodiprion sertifer Geoffroy, associated with different level of population density in some areas. J Facul Agricul Shinshu Univ 17:10–23Google Scholar
  47. Niemelä P, Mannila R, Mäntsälä P (1982) Deterrent in Scots pine, Pinus sylvestris, influencing feeding behaviour of the larvae of Neodiprion sertifer (Hymenoptera, Diprionidae). Ann ent Fenn 48:57–59Google Scholar
  48. Niklas OF, Franz J (1957) Begrenzungsfaktoren einer Gradation der Roten Kiefernbuschhornblattwespe (Neodiprion sertifer Geoffr) in Südwestdeutschland 1953 bis 1956. Mitteilungen aus der Biologischen Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft Berlin-Dahlem 89, p 39Google Scholar
  49. Ohigashi H, Wagner MR, Matsumura F, Benjamin DM (1981) Chemical basis of differential feeding behaviour of the larch sawfly Pristiphora erichsonii (Hartig). J Chem Ecol 7:599–614Google Scholar
  50. Perry DA, Pitman GB (1983) Genetic and environmental influences in host resistance to herbivory: Douglas-fir and the western spruce budworm. Z angew Ent 96:217–228Google Scholar
  51. Price PW, Bouton CE, Gross P, McPheron BA, Thompson JN, Weis AE (1980) Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11:41–65Google Scholar
  52. Raupp MJ, Denno RF (1983) Leaf age as predictor of herbivore distribution and abundance. In: Denno RF, McClure MS (eds) Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed systems. Academic Press, New York, pp 91–124Google Scholar
  53. Redak RA, Cates RG (1984) Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) — spruce budworm (Choristoneura occidentalis) interactions: the effect of nutrition, chemical defenses, tissue phenology, and tree physical parameters on budworm success. Oecologia (Berlin) 62:61–67Google Scholar
  54. Rhoades DF (1979) Evolution of plant chemical defense against herbivores. In: Rosenthal GA, Janzen DH (eds) Herbivores: their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, New York, pp 3–54Google Scholar
  55. Rhoades DF (1983) Response of alder and willow to attack by tent caterpillars and webworms: Evidence for pheromonal sensitivity of willows. In: Hedin PA (ed) Plant resistance to insects. American Chemical Society Symposium Series, No 208, pp 55–68Google Scholar
  56. Rhoades DF (1985) Offensive-defensive interactions between herbivores and plants: their relevance in herbivore population dynamics and ecological theory. Am Nat 125:205–238Google Scholar
  57. Rudnew DF (1963) Physiologischer Zustand der Wirtspflanze und Massenvermehrung von Fortschädlingen. Z angew Ent 53:46–68Google Scholar
  58. Ryan CA (1983) Insect-induced chemical signals regulating natural plant protection responses. In: Denno RF, McClure MS (eds) Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed systems. Academic Press, New York, pp 43–60Google Scholar
  59. Schönwiese F (1935) Beobachtungen und Versuche anläßlich einer Übervermehrung von Lophyrus sertifer Geoffr (rufus Panz) in Südkärnten in den Jahren 1931/32. Z angew Ent 21:463–500Google Scholar
  60. Schopf R (1983) Zur Nahrungsqualität von Fichtennadeln für forstliche Schadinsekten. 20. Korrelationen der Konzentrationen von Fichtennadelinhaltsstoffen mit Entwicklungsparameters der Blattwespe Gilpinia hercyniae Htg (Hym, Diprionidae). Z angew Ent 95:189–196Google Scholar
  61. Schuh BA, Benjamin DM (1984) The chemical feeding ecology of Neodiprion dubiosus Schedl, N. rugifrons Midd. and N. lecontei Fitch on jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb). J Chem Ecol 10:1071–1079Google Scholar
  62. Slansky F jr, Feeny PP (1977) Stabilization of the rate of nitrogen accumulation by larvae of the cabbage butterfly on wild and cultivated food plants. Ecol Monogr 47:209–228Google Scholar
  63. Swain T (1979) Tannins and lignins. In: Rosenthal GA, Janzen DH (eds) Herbivores: their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, New York, pp 657–682Google Scholar
  64. Thalenhorst W (1952) Das Auftreten von Kiefernbuschhornblattwespen in Norddeutschland 1949. z angew Ent 34:45–64Google Scholar
  65. Wagner MR, Benjamin DM, Clancy KM, Schuh BA (1983) Influence of diterpene resin acids on feeding and growth of larch sawfly Pristiphora erichsonii (Hartig). J Chem Ecol 9:119–127Google Scholar
  66. Waldbauer GP (1968) The consumption and utilization of food by insects. Adv Insect Physiol 5:229–288Google Scholar
  67. White TCR (1974) A hypothesis to explain outbreaks of looper caterpillars, with special reference to populations of Selidosema suavis in a plantation of Pinus radiata in New Zealand. Oecologia (Berlin) 16:279–301Google Scholar
  68. White TCR (1984) The abundance of invertebrate herbivores in relation to the availability of nitrogen in stressed food plants. Oecologia (Berlin) 63:90–105Google Scholar
  69. Whitham TG (1983) Host manipulation of parasites: within-plant variation as a defense against rapidly evolving parasites. In: Denno RF, McClure MS (eds) Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed systems. Academic Press, New York, pp 15–41Google Scholar
  70. Zucker WV (1983) Tannins: does structure determine function? An ecological perspective. Am Nat 121:335–365Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stig Larsson
    • 1
  • Christer Björkman
    • 1
  • Rolf Gref
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Forest EntomologySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Department of Forest Genetics and Plant PhysiologySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations