, Volume 60, Issue 3, pp 371–377 | Cite as

The relationship between sit and wait foraging strategy and dispersal in the desert scorpion, Scorpio maurus palmatus

  • Moshe Shachak
  • Sol Brand
Original Papers


We examine the role of the sit and wait foraging strategy and of the stability and predictability of the biotic environment in shaping population biology and life history traits of the desert scorpion, Scorpio maurus palmatus. The study was carried out in a loessial plain in the Negev desert, Israel. We used a grid system (5x80 m) within the Hammada scoparia plant association. The area was divided into 1,600 squares (50x50 cm) and the presence (within ±5 cm) and width of each scorpion burrow was recorded for eight years (1973–1980). It was found that: (1) Dispersal is a common phenomenon for all S. maurus palmatus age groups and takes place only after a heavy rainfall when soil moisture is high. (2) Dispersion patterns change from clumped to random as a function of age. (3) Dispersal is age specific and density dependent. (4) During the dry seasons a high percentage of the population goes into the resting stage.

In order to integrate the above findings, a graphical model was constructed with the main assumption that the S. maurus palmatus prey availability relationship is a decreasing function between the scorpion burrow and its food resources. Data and model analysis led to the conclusion that the desert scorpion, S. maurus palmatus, is confronted with a relatively predictable physical environmeent and unpredictable biological environment. Two alternative strategies are available for S. maurus palmatus to overcome prey unpredictability; dispersal during the rainy season and inactivity during the dry seasons.

We suggest that many other burrowing desert animals may face the problem of unpredictability of biological resources. Thus it seems that the S. maurus palmatus biological relationship model can be applied, with modifications, to a wide spectrum of desert burrowing animals.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amitai P (1980) Scorpions. Massada Ltd. Israel. (In Hebrew) pp 98Google Scholar
  2. Bub K, Bowerman RF (1979) Prey capture by the scorpion, Hadrurus arizonensis Ewing (Scorpiones vaejovidae). J Arachnol 7:243–253Google Scholar
  3. Danin A (1970) Phytosociological-Ecological suonographic of the northern Negev. Ph.D. thesis, Hebrew University, JerusalemGoogle Scholar
  4. Gadgil M, Bossert W (1970) Life history consequences of natural selection. Am Natur 104:1–24Google Scholar
  5. Giesel JT (1976) Reproductive strategies as adaptation to life in temporally heterogeneous environments. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 7:57–79Google Scholar
  6. Hadley NF, Williams SC (1968) Surface activities of some North American scorpions in relation to feeding. Ecology 49:726–734Google Scholar
  7. Lidicker WZ Jr (1975) The role of dispersal in the demography of small mammals. pp 103–128 in small mammals: their productivity and population dynamics. Int Bio Prog Vol 5. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  8. Luria M (1975) The annual vegetation in the desert loess plain of Sede Zin M Sc thesis, Hebrew University, JerusalemGoogle Scholar
  9. Morisita M (1959) Measuring the dispersion of individuals and analysis of distributional patterns. Mem Fac Sci Kyushu University. ser E (Biol) 2:215–235Google Scholar
  10. Noy-Meir I (1973) Desert ecosystems: Environment and producers. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 4:25–51Google Scholar
  11. Noy-Meir I (1974) Desert ecosystems: Higher trophic levels. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 5:195–214Google Scholar
  12. Polis GA, Farley RD (1980) Population biology of a desert scorpion: survivorship, microhabitat and the evolution of life history strategy. Ecology 61:620–629Google Scholar
  13. Schaffer WM, Gadgil MD (1975) Selection for optimal life histories in plants. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Harvard Univ Press Cambridge, Mass, USA, pp 142–157Google Scholar
  14. Shachak M (1980) Energy allocation and life history strategy of the desert isopod, Hemilepistus reaumuri Oecologia (Berlin) 45:404–413Google Scholar
  15. Stahnke HL (1966) Some aspects of scorpion behavior. Bull S Cal Acad Sci 65:65–80Google Scholar
  16. Williams SC (1963) Feeding ecology of the scorpion, Anuroctonus phaeodactylus in a chapparel community recovering from fire. Msc. thesis. San Diego St Col, Cal, p 71Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moshe Shachak
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sol Brand
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Biology Department, Blaustein Institute for Desert Research at Sede BoqerBen Gurion University of the NegevIsrael
  2. 2.Watershed Ecology Unit, Blaustein Institute for Desert Research at sede BoqerBen Gurion University of the NegevIsrael

Personalised recommendations