Carnosine and anserine concentrations in the quadriceps femoris muscle of healthy humans

  • A. F. Mannion
  • P. M. Jakeman
  • M. Dunnett
  • R. C. Harris
  • P. L. T. Willan
Article

Summary

The content of anserine and carnosine in the lateral portion of the quadriceps femoris muscle of 50 healthy, human subjects has been studied. Anserine was undetectable in all muscle samples examined. Muscle carnosine values for the group conformed to a normal distribution with a mean (SD) value of 20.0 (4.7) mmol · kg−1 of dry muscle mass. The concentration of carnosine was significantly higher in the muscle of male subjects (21.3, 4.2 mmol · kg−1 dry mass) than in females of a similar age and training status (17.5, 4.8 mmol · kg−1 dry mass) (P< 0.005). The test-retest reliability of measures was determined on a subgroup of 17 subjects. No significant difference in mean carnosine concentration was found between the two trials [21.5 (4.0) and 22.0 (5.2) mmol · kg−1 dry muscle mass; P>0.05]. The importance of carnosine as a physicochemical buffer within human muscle was examined by calculating its buffering ability over the physiological pH range. From the range of carnosine concentrations observed (7.2–30.7 mmol · kg−1 dry muscle mass), it was estimated that the dipeptide could buffer between 2.4 and 10.1 mmol H+ · kg−1 dry mass over the physiological pH range 7.1–6.5, contributing, on average, approximately 7% to the total muscle buffering. This suggests that in humans, in contrast to many other species, carnosine is of only limited importance in preventing the reduction in pH observed during high intensity exercise.

Key words

Carnosine Anserine Skeletal muscle buffering 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avena RM, Bowen WJ (1969) Effects of carnosine and anserine on muscle adenosine triphosphatases. J Biol Chem 244:1600–1604Google Scholar
  2. Bate-Smith EC (1938) The buffering of muscle in rigor: protein, phosphate and carnosine. J Physiol (Lond) 92:336–343Google Scholar
  3. Bergstrom J (1962) Muscle electrolytes in man determined by neutron activation analysis on needle biopsy specimens. A study on normal subjects, kidney patients and patients with chronic diarrhoea. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 14 [Suppl 68]:l-110Google Scholar
  4. Bergstrom J, Fürst P, Noree L-O, Vinnars E (1978) Intracellular free amino acids in muscle tissue of patients with chronic uraemia: effect of peritoneal dialysis and infusion of essential amino acids. Clin Sci Mol Med 54:51–60Google Scholar
  5. Boldyrev AA (1986) Biological significance of histidine-containing dipeptides. Biokhimiia 51:1930–1943Google Scholar
  6. Boldyrev AA, Dupin AM, Pindel EV, Severin SE (1988) Antioxidative properties of histidine-containing dipeptides from skeletal muscles of vertebrates. Comp Biochem Physiol [B] 89:245–250Google Scholar
  7. Christman AA (1976) Factors affecting anserine and carnosine levels in skeletal muscles of various animals. Int J Biochem 7:519–527Google Scholar
  8. Crush KG (1970) Carnosine and related substances in animal tissues. Comp Biochem Physiol 34:3–30Google Scholar
  9. Davey CL (1960) The significance of carnosine and anserine in striated skeletal muscle. Arch Biochem Biophys 89:303–308Google Scholar
  10. Downie NM, Heath RW (1974) Basic statistical methods, 4th edn. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Harris RC, Hultman E, Nordesjo L-O (1974) Glycogen, glycolytic intermediates and high-energy phosphates determined in biopsy samples of musculus quadriceps femoris of man at rest. Methods and variance of values. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 33:109–120Google Scholar
  12. Harrison SM, Lamont C, Miller DJ (1985) Carnosine and other natural imidazoles enhance muscle calcium sensitivity and are mimicked by caffeine and AR-L 115BS. J Physiol (Lond) 371:197PGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson P, Fedyna JS, Schindzielorg A, Moritz-Smith C, Rasvinsky PJ (1982) Regulation of muscle phosphorylase activity by carnosine and anserine. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 109:769–775Google Scholar
  14. Mannion AF, Jakeman PM, Willan PLT (1990) The measurement of skeletal muscle buffer value in man. J Physiol (Lond) 429:109PGoogle Scholar
  15. Marlin DJ, Harris RC, Snow DH (1988) Muscle buffering capacity and carnosine contents in the thoroughbred horse. Can J Sport Sci 13:24PGoogle Scholar
  16. Marlin DJ, Harris RC, Gash SP, Snow DH (1989) Carnosine content of the middle gluteal muscle in thoroughbred horses with relation to age, sex and training. Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 93:629–632Google Scholar
  17. Parker CJ, Ring E (1970) A comparative study of the effect of carnosine on myofibrillar ATPase activity of vertebrate and invertebrate muscles. Comp Biochem Physiol 37:413–419Google Scholar
  18. Parkhouse WS, McKenzie DC, Hochachka RW, Ovalle WK (1985) Buffering capacity of deproteinised human vastus lateralis muscle. J Appl Physiol 58 (1):14–17Google Scholar
  19. Safrit M (1981) Evaluation in physical education, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  20. Simoneau JA, Bouchard D (1989) Human variation in skeletal muscle fibre-type proportion and enzyme activities. Am J Physiol 257:E567-E572Google Scholar
  21. Tanokura M, Tasumi M, Miyazawa T (1976) 1H nuclear magnetic resonance studies of histidine-containing di and tripeptides. Estimation of the effects of charged groups on the pKa' value of the imidazole ring. Biopolymers 15:393–401Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. F. Mannion
    • 1
  • P. M. Jakeman
    • 1
  • M. Dunnett
    • 2
  • R. C. Harris
    • 2
  • P. L. T. Willan
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Sport and Exercise SciencesUniversity of BirminghamUK
  2. 2.Department of Comparative PhysiologyAnimal Health TrustNewmarketUK
  3. 3.Department of Cell and Structural BiologyUniversity of ManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations