Philosophical Studies

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 189–199 | Cite as

Lessons from Pseudo Scotus

  • Graham Priest
  • Richard Routley


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, A. R. and Belnap, N. D.: 1975, Entailment (Princeton U.P.).Google Scholar
  2. Brady, R.: (forthcoming), ‘The depth relevance of some paraconsistent logics’, Studia Logica.Google Scholar
  3. Carroll, L.: 1895, ‘What the tortoise said to Achilles’, Mind, N.S. IV, 1895. Reprinted in: Reading on Logic, ed by I. M. Copi and J. Gould.Google Scholar
  4. Copeland, B. J.: 1980, ‘The trouble Anderson and Belnap have with relevance’, Philosophical Studies 37, pp. 325–34.Google Scholar
  5. Epstein, R.: 1979, ‘Implication and relevance’, Philosophical Studies 36, pp. 137–224.Google Scholar
  6. Kuhn, T.: 1962, Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago U.P.).Google Scholar
  7. Mates, B.: 1965, ‘Psuedo Scotus on the soundness of “Consequentiae”‘ in Logic and Methodology, ed. by A-T. Tymieniecka (North Holland).Google Scholar
  8. Meyer, R.K., Routley, R., and Dunn, J. M.: 1979, ‘Curry's paradox’, Analysis 39, pp. 124–128.Google Scholar
  9. Priest, G.: 1979, ‘Two dogmas of Quineanism’, Philosophical Quarterly 29, pp. 288–301.Google Scholar
  10. Priest, G.: 1979a, ‘Logic of paradox’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, pp. 219–241.Google Scholar
  11. Priest, G.: 1980, ‘Sense, entailment and Modus Ponens’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 9, pp. 415–435.Google Scholar
  12. Priest, G.:(forthcoming), ‘Classical logic aufgehoben’, in Paraconsistent Logic, ed. by G. Priest and R. Routley.Google Scholar
  13. Priest, G. and Read, S.: (forthcoming), ‘Merely confused supposition’, Franciscan Studies.Google Scholar
  14. Read, S.: 1979, ‘Self reference and validity’, Synthese 42, pp. 265–274.Google Scholar
  15. Routley, R.: 1977, ‘Ultralogic as universal?’, Relevance Logic Newsletter 2, pp. 50–90, 187–205. Reprinted as Appendix 1 in Exploring Meinong's Jungle and Beyond, RSSS (Australian National University 1979).Google Scholar
  16. Routley, R. and Meyer, R. K.: (forthcoming), Relevant Logics and their Rivals.Google Scholar
  17. Routley, R. and Routley, V.: 1972, ‘Semantics of first degree entailment’, Noûs 6, pp. 335–59.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Co 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graham Priest
    • 1
    • 2
  • Richard Routley
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Western AustraliaAustralia
  2. 2.Australian National UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations