Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology

, Volume 66, Issue 3, pp 251–261

Some petrological aspects of the Prairie Creek diamond-bearing kimberlite diatreme, Arkansas

  • Subbarayudu V. Gogineni
  • Charles E. Melton
  • A. A. Giardini
Article

Abstract

Based on modal and chemical composition, the rocks of the Prairie Creek diatreme situated 4 km SSE of Murfreesboro, Pike County, Arkansas, are classified as micaceous kimberlite. The K-Ar isotopic analysis of phlogopite from this diatreme yielded an age of 106 ± 3 m.y. (Albian) which is in agreement with stratigraphic relations. Electron beam probe data on minerals from kimberlite breccia, one of the three textural types, are presented. The breccia is considered as the potential source of the diamonds that have been mined at the diatreme. It contains phenocrysts of olivine (Fo90–92) and serpentine pseudomorphs after olivine embedded in a groundmass of serpentine, minor calcite, chrome-diopside, phlogopite (Mg/Mg+Fe = 84.15%), perovskite, spinels, and pentlandite. Xenoliths of shales, sandstones, and mantle-derived ultramafic material are also present. Spinels are rich in Cr, Ti, and Fe and generally low in Al. Zoned spinels show enrichments in Ti and Fe towards their rims. A positive correlation between 100(Fe3++Ti)/(Cr+Al+Fe3++Ti) and 100 Mg/(Mg+Fe2+) ratios exists in these spinels and probably reflects an oxygen fugacity increase during magma crystallization. Occluded gases in diamonds and kimberlites corroborate the hypothesis that the parent magma of the Prairie Creek kimberlite was derived by partial melting of upper-mantle garnet lherzolite under volatile-rich conditions, primarily enriched in H2O and CO2.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albee, A.L., Ray, L.: Correction factors for the electron probe microanalysis of silicates, oxides, carbonates, phosphates, and sulfates. Anal. Chem. 42, 1408–1414 (1970)Google Scholar
  2. Aoki, K.: Phlogopites and potassic richterites from mica nodules in South African kimberlites. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 48, 1–7 (1974)Google Scholar
  3. Aoki, K.: Origin of phlogopite and potassic richterite bearing periodotite xenoliths from South Africa. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 53, 145–156 (1975)Google Scholar
  4. Bence, A.C., Albee, A.L.: Empirical correction factors for the electron microanalysis of silicates and oxides. J. Geol. 76, 382–403 (1968)Google Scholar
  5. Boettcher, A.L., Mysen, B.O., Modreski, P.J.: Melting in the mantle: Phase relationships in natural and synthetic Peridotite-H2O and Peridotite-H2O-CO2 systems at high pressures. Phys. Chem. Earth 9, 855–867 (1975)Google Scholar
  6. Boyd, F.R.: Garnet peridotites and the system CaSiO3-MgSiO3Al2O3. Mineral. Soc. Am. Spec. Papers 3, 63–75 (1970)Google Scholar
  7. Boyd, F.R.: A pyroxene geotherm. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 37, 2533–2546 (1973)Google Scholar
  8. Branner, J.C., Brackett, R.N.: The peridotite of Pike County, Arkansas. Am. J. Sci., 3rd ser., 38, 50–59 (1889)Google Scholar
  9. Cloos, H.: Bau und Tätigkeit von Tuffschloten. Geol. Rundschau 32, 709–800 (1941)Google Scholar
  10. Dawson, J.B.: Basutoland kimberlites. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 73, 545–560 (1962)Google Scholar
  11. Dawson, J.B.: A review of the geology of kimberlites. In: Ultramafic and related rocks (P.J. Wyllie, ed.), pp. 241–251. New York: Wiley 1967aGoogle Scholar
  12. Dawson, J.B.: Geochemistry and origin of kimberlite. In: Ultramafic and related rocks (P.J. Wyllie, ed.), pp. 269–278. New York: Wiley 1967bGoogle Scholar
  13. Dawson, J.B.: Advances in kimberlite geology. Earth-Sci. Rev. 7, 187–214 (1971)Google Scholar
  14. Eggler, D.H.: CO2 as a volatile component of the mantle: The system Mg2SiO4-SiO2-H2O-CO2. Phys. Chem. Earth 9, 869–881 (1975)Google Scholar
  15. Erickson, R.L., Blade, L.V.: Geochemistry and petrology of the alkalic igneous complex of Magnet Cove, Arkansas. U.S. Geol. Surv. Profess. Papers 425, 95p (1963)Google Scholar
  16. Fesq, H.W., Kable, E.J.D., Gurney, J.J.: Aspects of the geochemistry of kimberlites from the Primier Mine, and other selected South African occurrences with particular reference to the rare earth elements. Phys. Chem. Earth 9, 687–707 (1975)Google Scholar
  17. Finger, L.W.: The uncertainty in the calculated ferric iron-content of a microprobe analysis. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Year Book 71, 600–603 (1972)Google Scholar
  18. Frantsesson, E.V.: The petrology of the kimberlites. Trans, from Russian by D.A. Brown, Dept. of Geol. Australian National Univ. publ. no. 150, pp. 195 (1970)Google Scholar
  19. Giardini, A.A., Hurst, V.J., Melton, C.E., Stornier, J.C.: Biotite as a primary inclusion in diamond. Its nature and significance. Am. Mineralogist 59, 783–789 (1974)Google Scholar
  20. Giardini, A.A., Melton, C.E.: Gases released from natural and synthetic diamonds by crushing under high vacuum at 200 ° C, and their significance to diamond genesis. Fortschr. Mineral. 52, 455–464 (1975a)Google Scholar
  21. Giardini, A.A., Melton, C.E.: Chemical data on a colorless Arkansas diamond and its black amorphous C-Fe-Ni-S inclusion. Am. Mineralogist 60, 934–936 (1975b)Google Scholar
  22. Gupta, S., Melton, C.E., Giardini, A.A.: Gases released from dunite, kimberlite, diamond and coal upon crushing under a high vacuum. Bull. Georgia Acad. Sci. 33, 60–61 (1975)Google Scholar
  23. Haggerty, S.E.: Compositional variation in lunar spinels. Nature Phys. Sci. 233, 156–160 (1971)Google Scholar
  24. Haggerty, S.E.: Solid solution characteristics of lunar spinels. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Year Book 71, 474–480 (1972)Google Scholar
  25. Haggerty, S.E.: The chemistry and genesis of opaque minerals in kimberlites. Phys. Chem. Earth 9, 295–307 (1975)Google Scholar
  26. Hart, S.R., Dodd, R.T.: Excess radiogenic argon in pyroxenes. J. Geophys. Res. 67, 2998–2999 (1962)Google Scholar
  27. Ilupin, I.P., Lutz, B.G.: The chemical composition of kimberlite, and questions on the origin of kimberlite magma. Sov. Geol. 6, 61–73 (1971)Google Scholar
  28. Irvine, T.N.: Chromian spinel as a petrogenetic indicator. Part I. Theory. Can. J. Earth Sci. 2, 648–672 (1965)Google Scholar
  29. Kushiro, I., Aoki, K.: Origin of some eclogite inclusions in kimberlite. Am. Mineralogist 53, 1347–1367 (1968)Google Scholar
  30. McCallum, M.E., Eggler, D.H.: Diamonds in an upper mantle peridotite nodule from kimberlite in southern Wyoming. Science 192, 253–256 (1976)Google Scholar
  31. McCallum, M.E., Mabarak, C.D.: Diamond in kimberlitic diatremes of northern Colorado. Geology 4, 467–469 (1976a)Google Scholar
  32. McCallum, M.E., Mabarak, C.D.: Diamond in state-line kimberlite diatremes, Albany county, Wyoming and Earimer county, Colorado. Geol. Surv. Wyoming, Report of Invest. No. 12, 36p (1976b)Google Scholar
  33. Melton, C.E., Giardini, A.A.: Experimental results and a theoretical interpretation of gaseous inclusions found in Arkansas natural diamonds. Am. Mineralogist 60, 413–417 (1975)Google Scholar
  34. Mercier, J.C.: Natural peridotites: Chemical and rheological heterogeneity of the upper mantle. Unpublished Ph. D. thesis, State University of New York, Stony Brook (1976)Google Scholar
  35. Meyer, H.O.A., Svisero, D.P.: Mineral inclusions in Brazilian diamonds. Phys. Chem. Earth 9, 785–795 (1975)Google Scholar
  36. Miser, H.D.: Relation of Ouachita belt of Paleozoic rocks to oil and gas fields of mid-continent region. Bull. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geologists 18, 1059–1077 (1934)Google Scholar
  37. Miser, H.D., Purdue, A.H.: Geology of the DeQueen and Caddo Gap Quadrangles, Arkansas. U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull. 808, 195 pp. (1929)Google Scholar
  38. Miser, H.D., Ross, C.S.: Diamond-bearing peridotite in Pike County, Arkansas. Econ. Geol. 17, 662–674 (1922)Google Scholar
  39. Miser, H.D., Ross, C.S.: Diamond-bearing peridotite in Pike County, Arkansas. U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull. 735, 279–322 (1923)Google Scholar
  40. Moody, C.L.: Mesozoic igneous rocks of northern Gulf Coastal Plain. Bull. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geologists 33, 1410–1428 (1949)Google Scholar
  41. Mysen, B.O.: Role of volatiles in mantle magma genesis. Geol. Soc. Am. Abs., 1976 Annual Meeting, p. 1025 (1976)Google Scholar
  42. Newton, M.G., Melton, C.E., Giardini, A.A.: Mineral inclusions in an Arkansas diamond. Am. Mineralogist 62, 583–586 (1977)Google Scholar
  43. Nockolds, S.R.: Average chemical composition of some igneous rocks. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 65, 1007–1032 (1954)Google Scholar
  44. Reynolds, D.L.: Fluidization as a geological process, and its bearing on the problem of intrusive granites. Am. J. Sci. 252, 577–614 (1954)Google Scholar
  45. Ross, C.S., Miser, H.D., Stephenson, L.W.: Water-laid volcanic rocks of early Upper Cretaceous age in southwestern Arkansas, southeastern Oklahoma, and northeastern Texas. U.S. Geol. Surv. Profess. Papers 154-F, 175–202 (1929)Google Scholar
  46. Shoemaker, E.M., Moore, H.J.: Diatremes on the Navajo and Hopi Reservations. U.S. Geol. Surv. Trace Elements Inv. Rept. 640, 197–203 (1956)Google Scholar
  47. Stevens, R.E.: Composition of some chromites of the western hemisphere. Am. Mineralogist 29, 1–34 (1944)Google Scholar
  48. Thayer, T.P.: Preliminary chemical correlation of chromite with the containing rocks. Econ. Geol. 41, 202–217 (1946)Google Scholar
  49. Thomson, R.N.: Titanian chromite and chromian titanomagnetite from a Snake River Plain basalt, a terrestrial analogue to lunar spinels. Am. Mineralogist 58, 826–830 (1973)Google Scholar
  50. Wagner, P.A.: The diamond fields of Southern Africa. The Transvaal Leader, Johannesburg (1914)Google Scholar
  51. Zartman, R.E.: Geochronology of some alkalic rock provinces in eastern and central United States. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 5, 257–286 (1977)Google Scholar
  52. Zartman, R.E., Brock, M.R., Heyl, A.V., Thomas, H.H.: K-Ar and Rb-Sr ages of some alkalic intrusive rocks from Central and Eastern United States. Am. J. Sci. 265, 848–870 (1967)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Subbarayudu V. Gogineni
  • Charles E. Melton
    • 1
  • A. A. Giardini
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Department of GeologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations