Philosophical Studies

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 149–168 | Cite as

Intuitive semantics for first-degree entailments and ‘coupled trees’

  • J. Michael Dunn


Couple Tree Intuitive Semantic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, A. R. and Belnap, Jr., N. D., ‘Tautological Entailments’, Philosophical Studies 13, (1961), 9–24.Google Scholar
  2. Bar-Hillel, Y., Language and Information, Reading, Mass., 1964.Google Scholar
  3. Carnap, R., and Bar-Hillel, Y., ‘An Outline of a Theory of Semantic Information’, MIT Research Lab. of Electronics Tech. Report, No. 247, 1952. Also reprinted as Ch. 15 of Bar-Hillel (1964).Google Scholar
  4. Dunn, J. M., The Algebra of Intensional Logics, unpublished dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1966.Google Scholar
  5. Dunn, J. M., ‘The Effective Equivalence of Certain Propositions about de Morgan Lattices’, (Abstract) Journal of Symbolic Logic, 32, 1967.Google Scholar
  6. Dunn, J. M., ‘Natural Language versus Formal Language’, a mimeo of a talk in the joint APA-ASL Symposium by that title, New York, Dec. 27, 1969.Google Scholar
  7. Dunn, J. M., ‘An Intuitive Semantics for First Degree Relevant Implications’, (Abstract) Journal of Symbolic Logic 36, (1971a) pp. 362–363.Google Scholar
  8. Dunn, J. M., ‘A Kripke-Style Semantics for R-Mingle’, contributed paper, Tarski Symposium, Univ. of California, Berkeley, June, (mimeo abstracts of contributed papers distributed to participants), 1971b.Google Scholar
  9. Dunn, J. M., ‘A Modification of Parry's Analytic Implication’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, XIII, (1972), pp. 195–205.Google Scholar
  10. Geach, P. T. and Black, M., Translations From the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, Oxford, 1960.Google Scholar
  11. Jeffrey, R. C., Formal Logic: Its Scope and Limits, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
  12. Lewis, C. I. and Langford, C. H., Symbolic Logic, New York, 1932.Google Scholar
  13. Montague, R., ‘Pragmatics and Intensional Logic’, in Semantics of Natural Language, ed. by D. Davidson and G. Harman, (Dordrecht, Holland), 1972, pp. 142–168.Google Scholar
  14. Pears, D. F. and McGuinness, B. F., English translation of L. W. Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, London, 1961.Google Scholar
  15. Routley, R. and Routley, V., ‘The Semantics of First Degree Entailment’, 1972, Noûs, VI (1972), pp. 335–359.Google Scholar
  16. Routley, R. and Meyer, R. K., ‘The Semantics of Entailment’, in Truth, Syntax and Modality, ed. by H. Leblanc, Amsterdam 1973, pp. 198–243.Google Scholar
  17. Smullyan, R., First-Order Logic, Berlin, 1968.Google Scholar
  18. Van Fraassen, B., ‘Facts and Tautological Entailments’, The Journal of Philosophy, LXVI, (1969), pp. 477–487.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Michael Dunn
    • 1
  1. 1.Indiana UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations