Advertisement

Bioprocess Engineering

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 99–104 | Cite as

Multistage affinity cross-flow filtration: mathematical modelling and analysis

  • X. -Y. Dong
  • L. -Y. Li
  • Y. Sun
Originals

Abstract

A multistage affinity cross-flow filtration (mACFF) process for protein purification is proposed. The process is mathematically modelled taking into account a case of rapid equilibrium binding of a target protein to its macroligand. The process performance, i.e., dimensionless breakthrough volume (Q b + )and recovery yield (REC) to obtain a desired purity is analysed by computer simulations. The results indicate that Q b + increases with the increase of stage number (n) due to the increase of affinity binding efficiency. In addition, REC also increases with the increase of n, especially for lower affinity systems, even though the feed loading is the same as the corresponding breakthrough volume that increases with n. Thus both feed loading and recovery yield can be enhanced by raising the stage number. Incompletely permeable membranes reject the target and contaminant proteins. So they delay the appearance of the breakthrough point and compromise the contaminant washing efficiency. Hence although Q b + increases with the increase of membrane rejection coefficient (R), REC decreases when the feed loading equals that of Q b + . However, when the feed loading is kept unchanged and equals Q b + at R=0, REC does not decrease, but slightly increases with the increase of R. This result indicates that incompletely permeable membranes may also be employed for the mACFF process. In general, the model gives a predictive evaluation of the mACFF process successfully.

Keywords

Waste Water Affinity Binding Permeable Membrane Process Performance Protein Purification 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

List of Symbols

C mol/l

contaminant concentration

F l/min

flow rate

f

macroligand volume fraction

j

index for stage number

Kdmol/l

dissociation constant

n

number of stages

P %

purity

Q 1

feeding or washing volume

q mol/l

binding density

qmmol/l

binding capacity

R

membrane rejection coefficient

REC %

recovery yield

T mol/l

target protein concentration

t min

time

V 1

sum of contactor volumes

Vj1

volume of the jth stage contactor

Subscript and Superscript

b

breakthrough

C

contaminant proteins

f

feeding step

in

feeding broth into the 1st stage

j

the jth contactor

o

out of contactor (filtrate)

T

target protein

w

washing step

+

dimensionless quantity

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ling, T.G.; Mattiasson, B.: Membrane filtration affinity purification (MFAP) of dehydrogenase using Cibacron blue. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 34 (1989) 1321–1325Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pungor, E. Jr.; Afeyan, N.B.; Gordon, N.F.: Continuous affinity-recycle extraction: a novel protein separation technique. Bio/technol. 5 (1987) 604–608Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Afeyan, N.B.; Gordon, N.F.; Cooney, C.L.: Mathematical modelling of the affinity-recycle extraction purification technique. J. Chromatogr. 478 (1989) 1–19Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Luong, J.H.T.; Male, K.B.; Nguyen, A.L.: A continuous affinity ultrafiltration process for trypsin purification. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 31 (1988) 516–520Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luong, J.H.T.; Male, K.B.; Nguyen, A.L.: Mathematical modelling of affinity ultrafiltration process. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 32 (1988) 451–459Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Powers, J.D.; Kilpatrick, P.K.; Carbonell, R.G.: Trypsin purification by affinity binding to small unilamelar liposomes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 36 (1990) 506–519Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mattiasson, B.; Ramstorp, M.: Ultrafiltration affinity purification. J. Chromatogr. 283 (1984) 323–330Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Male, K.B.; Nguyen, A.L.; Luong, J.H.T.: Isolation of urokinase by affinity ultrafiltration. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 35 (1990) 87–93Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weiner, C.; Sara, M.; Dasgupta, G.; Sleytr, U.B.: Affinity cross-flow filtration: purification of IgG with a novel protein A affinity matrix prepared from two-dimensional protein crystals. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 44 (1994) 55–65Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sun, Y.; Dong, X.Y.; Yu, K.: Trypsin purification by affinity precipitation using polymerized liposome as ligand carrier. Chem. Ind. Eng. (China), in pressGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Luong, J.H.T.; Male, K.B.; Nguyen, A.L.: Synthesis and characterization of a water-soluble affinity polymer for trypsin purification. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 31 (1988) 439–446Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sun, Y.; Xu, X.Y.; Wang, S.T.: Preparation and characterization of ligand-modified liposomes for trypsin separation. Chem. Ind. Eng. 44 (1993) 359–365Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sun, Y.; Yu, K.; Zhou, X.Z.: Polymerized liposome as an affinity support for enzyme affinity ultrafiltration. In Teo, W.K. et al (ed). Better Living Through Innovative Biochem. Eng., pp. 613–615. Continental Press, Singapore, 1994Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sun, Y.; Yu, K.; Jin, X.H.; Zhou, X.Z.: Polymerized liposome as ligand carrier for affinity precipitation of proteins. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 47 (1995) 20–25Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • X. -Y. Dong
    • 1
  • L. -Y. Li
    • 1
  • Y. Sun
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering and Research Center for BiotechnologyTianjin UniversityTianjinP.R. China

Personalised recommendations