Advertisement

Philosophical Studies

, Volume 81, Issue 2–3, pp 283–301 | Cite as

Naturalness and arbitrariness

  • Theodore Sider
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong, D.M. (1989) Universals: An Optionated Introduction. (Westview Press, Boulder: 1989).Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, D.M. (1986) “In Defense of Structural Universals”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64 (1986): 85–88.Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong, D.M. (1978a) Nominalism and Realism (Universals and Scientific Realism Vol. I). (Cambridge University Press, New York: 1978).Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong, D.M. (1978b) A Theory of Universals ((Universals and Scientific Realism Vol. II). (Cambridge University Press, New York: 1978).Google Scholar
  5. Benacceraf, Paul. (1965) “What Numbers Could Not Be”. The Philosophical Review 74 (1965): 47–73.Google Scholar
  6. Forrest, Peter. (1986) “Neither Magic Nor Mereology: A Reply to Lewis”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64 (1986): 89–91.Google Scholar
  7. Kripke, Saul. (1981) “Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: an Elementary Exposition”. In Irving Black, ed., Perspectives on Wittgenstein (Basil Blackwell Press, Oxford: 1981).Google Scholar
  8. Lewis, David. (1991) Parts of Classes. (Basil Blackwell Press, Oxford: 1991).Google Scholar
  9. Lewis, David. (1986a) “Against Structural Universals”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64 (1986): 25–46.Google Scholar
  10. Lewis, David. (1986b) On the Plurality of Worlds. (Basil Blackwell Press, Oxford: 1986).Google Scholar
  11. Lewis, David. (1984) “Putnam's Paradox”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (1984): 221–236.Google Scholar
  12. Lewis, David. (1983) “New Work for a Theory of Universals”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (1983): 343–377.Google Scholar
  13. Quine, W.V. (1976) “Whither Physical objects?”. In R.S. Cohen et al. (eds), Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos (D. Reidel Press, Dordrecht: 1976), pp. 497–504.Google Scholar
  14. Resnik, Michael. (1980) Frege and the Philosophy of Mathematics. (Cornell University Press, Ithaca: 1980).Google Scholar
  15. Sider, Theodore. (1995) “Sparseness, Immanence, and Naturalness”, Noûs 29: 360–377.Google Scholar
  16. Wetzel, Linda. (1989) “That Numbers Could Be Objects”. Philosophical Studies 56 (1989): 273–292.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theodore Sider
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of RochesterRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations