Natural Language Semantics

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 149–179 | Cite as

On the proper treatment of opacity in certain verbs

  • Thomas Ede Zimmermann


This paper is about the semantic analysis of referentially opaque verbs like seek and owe that give rise to nonspecific readings. It is argued that Montague's categorization (based on earlier work by Quine) of opaque verbs as properties of quantifiers runs into two serious difficulties: the first problem is that it does not work with opaque verbs like resemble that resist any lexical decomposition of the seek ≈ try to find kind; the second one is that it wrongly predicts de dicto (i.e. narrow scope) readings due to quantified noun phrases in the object positions of such verbs. It is shown that both difficulties can be overcome by an analysis of opaque verbs as operating on properties.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bennett, M. R.: 1974, Some Extensions of a Montague Fragment of English, PhD dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  2. Benthem, J. van: 1984, ‘Questions about Quantifiers’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 49, 443–66.Google Scholar
  3. Buridanus, J.: 1350, Sophismata, ed. by Th. K. Scott, Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart 1977.Google Scholar
  4. Cresswell, M. J. and A. von Stechow: 1982, ‘De re Belief Generalized’, Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 503–35.Google Scholar
  5. Dowty, D.: 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  6. Gallin, D.: 1975, Intensional and Higher-Order Modal Logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  7. Geach, P.: 1965, ‘A Medieval Discussion of Intentionality’, in Y. Bar-Hillel (ed.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 425–33.Google Scholar
  8. Heim, I.: 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, PhD dissertation, GLSA, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
  9. Jacobs, J.: 1991, ‘Negation’, in A. v. Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik/Semantics, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 560–96.Google Scholar
  10. Kamp, H.: 1981, ‘A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation’, in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, M. Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Part 1, Mathematical Centre Tract 135, Amsterdam, pp. 277–322.Google Scholar
  11. Kamp, H. and U. Reyle: forthcoming, From Discourse to Logic, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  12. Kaplan, D.: 1969, ‘Quantifying in’, in D. Davidson and J. Hintikka (eds.), Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 178–214.Google Scholar
  13. Kaplan, D.: 1977, ‘Demonstratives’, in J. Almog, J. Perry, H. Wettstein (eds.), 1989, Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 481–563.Google Scholar
  14. Klein, E.: 1979, On Sentences Which Report Beliefs, Desires and Other Mental Attitudes, PhD dissertation, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  15. Kripke, S. A.: 1972, ‘Naming and Necessity’, in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 253–355; 763–769.Google Scholar
  16. Kripke, S. A.: 1979, ‘A Puzzle about Belief’, in A. Margalit (ed.), Meaning and Use, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 239–283.Google Scholar
  17. Lerner, J.-Y. and T. E. Zimmermann: 1983, ‘Presuppositions and Quantifiers’, in R. Bäuerle, Ch. Schwarze, A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 290–301.Google Scholar
  18. Lewis, D. K.: 1979, ‘Attitudes de dicto and de se’, Philosophical Review 8, 513–43.Google Scholar
  19. Link, G.: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms’, in R. Bäuerle, Ch. Schwarze, A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 302–23.Google Scholar
  20. McCawley, J. D.: 1968, ‘Lexical Insertion in a Transformational Grammar without Deep Structures’, in B. J. Darden, C.-J. Bailey, A. Davison (eds.), Papers from the Fourth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, pp. 71–80.Google Scholar
  21. Milsark, G.: 1977, ‘Toward an Explanation of Certain Peculiarities of the Existential Construction in English’, Linguistic Analysis 3, 1–29.Google Scholar
  22. Montague, R.: 1969, ‘On the Nature of Certain Philosophical Entities’, Monist 53, 159–94.Google Scholar
  23. Montague, R.: 1970, ‘Universal Grammar’, Theoria 36, 373–98.Google Scholar
  24. Montague, R.: 1973, ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, in J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik, P. Suppes (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 221–42.Google Scholar
  25. Padoa, A.: 1901, ‘Essai d'une théorie algébrique des nombres entiers, précédé d'une introduction logique à une théorie déductive quelconque’, Bibliothèque du Congrés international de philosophie, Paris, 1900, vol. 3, Armand Colin, Paris, pp. 309–65.Google Scholar
  26. Parsons, T.: 1980, Nonexistent Objects, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  27. Partee, B.: 1987, ‘Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type Shifting Principles’, in J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, M. Stokhof (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 115–43.Google Scholar
  28. Partee, B.: 1987, ‘Many Quantifiers’, Proceedings of ESCOL.Google Scholar
  29. Quine, W. V. O.: 1956, ‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’, Journal of Philosophy 53, 157–87.Google Scholar
  30. Quine, W. V. O.: 1960, Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  31. Rooth, M.: 1985, Association with Focus, PhD dissertation, GLSA, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
  32. Stechow, A. von: 1980, ‘Modification of Noun Phrases. A Challenge for Compositional Semantics’, Theoretical Linguistics 7, 57–110.Google Scholar
  33. Stechow, A. von: 1992, Lexical Decomposition and Syntax, Arbeitspapier Nr. 44, Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
  34. Vendler, Z.: 1967, Linguistics in Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
  35. Zimmermann, T. E.: 1983, ‘Notes on a Recent Textbook in Semantics’, Theoretical Linguistics 10, 65–79.Google Scholar
  36. Zimmermann, T. E.: 1989, ‘Intensional Logic and Two-Sorted Type Theory’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 54, 65–77.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Ede Zimmermann
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für maschinelle SprachverarbeitungUnivesität StuttgartStuttgart 1Germany

Personalised recommendations