Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 86–114 | Cite as

Mineralogy and genesis of the metamorphosed manganese silicate rocks (gondite) of Gowari Wadhona, Madhya Pradesh, India

  • Supriya Roy
  • P. K. Purkait


Manganese silicate rocks, interbanded with manganese oxide orebodies, constitute an important stratigraphic horizon in the Mansar formation of the Sausar Group of Precambrian age in India. The manganese silicate rocks of Gowari Wadhona occupy the westernmost flank of the manganese belt of the Sausar Group. These rocks are constituted of spessartite, calcium-rich rhodonite, quartz, manganoan diopside, blanfordite (manganese bearing member of diopside-acmite series), brown manganese pyroxene (manganese bearing aegirine-augite), winchite (manganese bearing richterite-tremolite), juddite (manganese bearing amphibole with richterite, tremolite, magnesioriebeckite and glaucophane molecules), tirodite (manganese bearing amphibole with richterite, cummingtonite and glaucophane molecules), manganophyllite, alurgite, piedmontite, braunite, hollandite (and other lower oxides of manganese) with minor apatite, plagioclase, calcite, dolomite and microcline. A complete mineralogical account of the manganese-bearing phases has been given in the text. It has been shown that the juxtaposition of manganese silicate rocks with dolomitic marble, regional metamorphism to almandine-amphibolite facies and assimilation of pegmatite veins cutting across the manganese formation, were responsible for the development of these manganese silicate rocks and the unusual chemical composition of some of the constituent minerals. It has been concluded that the manganese silicate rocks of Gowari Wadhona were originally laid down as sediments comprising manganese oxides admixed with clay, silica etc. and were later regionally metamorphosed to almandine-amphibolite facies. All evidences indicate that rhodochrosite was not present in the original sediment and the bulk composition of the sediments was rich in manganese. These rocks agree entirely to the detailed nomenclature of the gondites enunciated by Fermor (1909) and amplified by Roy and Mitra (1964) and Roy (1966).


Manganese Dolomite Apatite Manganese Oxide Diopside 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Babu, S.K., and V.K. Nayak: Richterite (manganese amphibole) from Miragpur Mine, Balaghat District, Madhya Pradesh. Proc. Natl. Inst. Sci. India 27A, 161–166 (1961).Google Scholar
  2. Basu, N.K.: A note on the occurrence of spandite and tirodite from Nagpur District, Bombay. Sci. and Culture (Calcutta) 22, 576–578 (1957).Google Scholar
  3. —: Petrology of the Sausar series rocks of Mahuli-Ramtek-Junewani area of Nagpur District. Proc. Natl. Inst. Sci. India 30A, 95–116 (1964).Google Scholar
  4. Bilgrami, S.A.: Manganese amphiboles from Sitasaongi mine, Bhandara Dt., India. Mineral. Mag. 30, 633–647 (1955).Google Scholar
  5. —: Manganese silicate minerals from Chikla, Bhandara District, India. Mineral. Mag. 31, 236–244 (1956).Google Scholar
  6. Chakraborty, K.L.: Relationship of anthophyllite, cummingtonite and mangan cummingtonite in the metamorphosed Wabush Iron Formation, Labrador. Can. Mineralogist 7, 738–750 (1963).Google Scholar
  7. —: Feroomagnesian silicate minerals in the metamorphosed iron formations of Wabush Lake and adjacent areas, Newfoundland and Quebec. Bull. Geol. Survey Canada 143, 1–34 (1966).Google Scholar
  8. Deer, W.A., R.A. Howie, and J. Zussman: Rock forming minerals, Chain silicates 2 (1963).Google Scholar
  9. Derby, O.A.: On the manganese ore deposits of the Queluz (Lafayette) district, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Am. J. Sci. 162, 18–21 (1901).Google Scholar
  10. Dorr, J.V.N., I. S. Coelho, and A. Horen: The manganese ore deposits of Minas Gerais, Brazil. 20th Int. Geol. Congr., Symposium on Manganese 3, 277–346 (1956).Google Scholar
  11. Dunn, J.A., and P.C. Roy: Tirodite, a manganese amphibole from Tirodi, Central Provinces. Records Geol. Survey India 73, 295–298 (1939).Google Scholar
  12. Ebert, H.: The manganese bearing Lafaiete formation as a guide horizon in the Pre-Cambrian of Minas Gerais. Anals da Acad. Bras. de Ciencias 35, 545–559 (1963).Google Scholar
  13. Fermor, L.L.: The manganese ore deposits of India. Mem. Geol. Survey India 37 (1909).Google Scholar
  14. Fyfe, W.S., and F.J. Turner: Reappraisal of the metamorphic facies concept. Contr. Mineral. and Petrol. 12, 354–364 (1966).Google Scholar
  15. Hewett, D.F., C.S. Chesterman, and B.W. Troxel: Tephroite in California manganese deposits. Econ. Geol. 56, 39–58 (1961).Google Scholar
  16. Hietanen, A.: On the petrology of Finnish quartzites. Bull. comm. geol. Finlande 122, 188 (1938).Google Scholar
  17. Holtrop, J.F.: The manganese deposits of the Guiana Shield. Econ. Geol. 60, 1185–1212 (1965).Google Scholar
  18. Jaffe, H.W., W.O.J. Groeneveld Meyer, and D.H. Selchow: Manganoan Cummingtonite from Nsuta, Ghana. Am. Mineralogist 46, 642–653 (1961).Google Scholar
  19. Kilpady, S. R.: An x-ray study and re-examination of blanfordite. Proc. Natl. Inst. Sci. India 26, 250–259 (1960).Google Scholar
  20. —: Winchite from Ponia, Balaghat District, Madhya Pradesh. J. Univ. Geol. Soc. Nagpur 1, 7 (1964).Google Scholar
  21. —, and A.S. Dave: Amphiboles associated with manganese bearing rocks of Madhya Pradesh. Current Sci. India 23, 180–181 (1954).Google Scholar
  22. Kitson, A.E., and N.R. Junner: Manganese ore deposits of the Gold Coast, Africa. Trans. Amer. Inst. Mining Engrs 75, 372–396 (1927).Google Scholar
  23. Klein, C.: Cummingtonite-grunerite series; a chemical, optical and x-ray studies. Am. Mineralogist 49, 963–82 (1964).Google Scholar
  24. —: Mineralogy and petrology of the metamorphosed Wabush Iron Formation, Southwestern Labrador. J. Petrology 7, 246–305 (1966).Google Scholar
  25. Liebau, F., W. Hilmer, u. G. Lindemann: Über die Kristallstruktur des Rhodonits (Mn, Ca) SiO3. Acta. Cryst. 12, 182 (1959).Google Scholar
  26. Momoi, H.: Mineralogical study of rhodonites in Japan with special reference to contact metamorphism. Mem. Fac. Sci., Kyushu Univ., Ser. D 15, 39–63 (1964).Google Scholar
  27. Nayak, V.K.: Juddite from Kajlidongri manganese mine, Jhabua Dt., Madhya Pradesh, India. Mineral. Mag. 32, 736–737 (1961).Google Scholar
  28. —, and K.J. Neuvonen: Some manganese minerals from India. Compt. rend. soc. geol. Finlande 35, 27–37 (1963).Google Scholar
  29. Phillips, R., and W. Layton: The calciferous and alkali amphiboles. Mineral. Mag. 32, 1097–1109 (1964).Google Scholar
  30. Roy, Supriya: Syngenetic Manganese formations of India. Jadavpur University, Calcutta, India, 1–219 (1966).Google Scholar
  31. Roy, Sushanta Kumar: Geology of the area around Jothvad, Panch Mahals District, Gujarat, with special reference to the manganese formations. Unpubl. Ph. D. Thesis. Jadavpur University, 1966.Google Scholar
  32. Roy, Supriya, and F.N. Mitra: Mineralogy and genesis, of the gondites associated with metamorphic manganese orebodies of Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra, India. Proc. Natl. Inst. Sci. India, 30, 395–438 (1964).Google Scholar
  33. —, and P.K. Purkait: Stability relations of manganese oxide minerals in metamorphic orebodies corresponding to silimanite grade in Gowari Wadhona mine-area, Chhindwara District, Madhya Pradesh, India. Econ. Geol. 60, 601–613 (1965).Google Scholar
  34. Sadashivaiah, M.S., and C. Naganna: Winchite from Jothvad, Panch Mahal District, Gujarat State. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 59A, 355–361 (1964).Google Scholar
  35. Sathe, R.V.: A study of manganese garnets from Jothwad, Panch Mahal District, Bombay State. J. Univ. Poona, Sci. Technol. 12, 87–91 (1957).Google Scholar
  36. —, V.V. Peshwa, and B.M. Karmarkar: Winchite from Goldongri manganese mine, Panch Mahal District, Gujarat. Bull. Geochem. Soc. India 1, 36–39 (1965).Google Scholar
  37. Segeler, C.G.: First U.S. occurrence of manganoan cummingtonite, tirodite. Am. Mineralogist 46, 637–641 (1961).Google Scholar
  38. Straczek, J. A., S. Narayanswami, K. D. Shukla, N. A. Vemban, S. C. Chakravarty, M. R. Subramanyan, and V. Venkatesh: Manganese ore deposits of Madhya Pradesh, India. 20th Int. Geol. Congr., Symposium on Manganese 4, 63–96 (1956).Google Scholar
  39. Sundius, N.: Zur Kenntnis der monoklinen C-armen Amphibole (Grünerit-Cummingtonit-Reihe). Geol. Fören. i. Stockholm Förh. 46, 154–167 (1924).Google Scholar
  40. —: The classification of the hornblendes and the solid solution relations in the amphibole group. Sveriges Geol. Undersökning. Årsbok 40, 1–36 (1946).Google Scholar
  41. Turner, F.J., and J. Verhoogen: Igneous and metamorphic petrology. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. 1960.Google Scholar
  42. Woodland, A.W.: The petrography and petrology of the lower Cambrian manganese ore of west Merionetshire. Quart. J. Geol. Soc. London 95, 1 (1939).Google Scholar
  43. Zwaan, P.C., and L. Van der Plas: Optical and x-ray investigation of some pyroxenes and amphiboles from Nagpur, Central Provinces, India. Koninkl. Ned. Akad. Westenschap Proc., Ser. B, 61, 265–277 (1958).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • Supriya Roy
    • 1
  • P. K. Purkait
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geological SciencesJadavpur UniversityCalcutta-32India

Personalised recommendations