Studia Logica

, Volume 50, Issue 2, pp 261–274 | Cite as

Erotetic arguments: A preliminary analysis

  • Andrzej Wiśniewski
Article

Abstract

The concept of erotetic argument is introduced. Two relations between sets of declarative sentences and questions are analysed; and two classes of erotetic arguments are characterized.

Keywords

Preliminary Analysis Mathematical Logic Computational Linguistic Declarative Sentence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    N. D. Belnap, Questions, their presuppositions and how they can fail to arise, in: K.Lambert (ed.), The Logical Way of Doing Things, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1969, pp. 23–37.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    N. D. Belnap and Th. B. Steel, The Logic of Questions and Answers, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1976.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    W. Buszkowski, Presuppositional completeness, Studia Logica 48 (1989), pp. 23–34.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    D. Harrah, Communication: A Logical Model, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass., 1963.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    D. Harrah, The logic of questions, in: D.Gabbay and F.Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Volume II: Extensions of Classical Logic, D.Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984, pp. 715–764.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    J. Hintikka, The interrogative approach to inquiry and probabilistic inference, Erkenntnis 26 (1987), pp. 429–442.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. Hintikka, The role of logic in argumentation, The Monist 72 (1989), pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    J. Hintikka and M. B. Hintikka, Sherlock Holmes confronts modern logic: Towards a theory of information-seeking by questioning, in: E.M.Barth and J.L.Martens (eds.), Argumentation: Approaches to Theory Formation, Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1982, pp. 55–76.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    L. Koj, On justification of questions, in: L.Koj and A.Wiśniewski, Inquiries into the Generating and Proper Use of Questions, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMCS, Lublin, 1989, pp. 61–89.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    T. Kubiński, An Outline of the Logical Theory of Questions, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1980.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    D. Scott, Completeness and axiomatizability in many-valued logic, in: L.Henkin et al.(eds.), Proceedings of the Tarski Symposium, AMS, Providence. 1974, pp. 411–435.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    D. J. Shoesmith and T. J. Smiley, Multiple-conclusion Logic, Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, 1978.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    A. Wiśniewski, Propositional logic and erotetic inferences, Bulletin of the Section of Logic, Polish Academy of Sciences, vol. 14, No. 2 (1985), pp. 72–78. Correction, ibid., vol. 15, No. 1 (1986), p. 35.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    A. Wiśniewski, The generating of questions: a study of some erotetic aspects of rationality, in: L.Koj and A.Wiśniewski, Inquiries into the Generating and Proper Use of Questions, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMCS, Lublin, 1989, pp. 91–155.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    A. Wiśniewski, Implied questions, Manuscrito 13, No. 2 (1990), pp. 23–38.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    A. Wiśniewski, Stawianie pytań: logika i racjonalność (The Posing of Questions: Logic and Rationality), Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMCS, Lublin, 1990.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Polish Academy of Sciences 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrzej Wiśniewski
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PhilosophyAdam Mickiewicz UniversityPoznańPoland

Personalised recommendations