Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 39–45 | Cite as

Use of chrome azurol S reagents to evaluate siderophore production by rhizosphere bacteria

  • D. B. Alexander
  • D. A. Zuberer
Article

Summary

Siderophores produced by rhizosphere bacteria may enhance plant growth by increasing the availability of Fe near the root or by inhibiting the colonization of roots by plant pathogens or other harmful bacteria. To examine the populations of siderophore-producing bacteria colonizing the roots of two grass species that differed in their susceptibility to Fe deficiency, we inoculated serial dilutions of root samples onto chrome azurol S (CAS) agar and several other selective and non-selective culture meida. CAS agar effectively differentiated bacteria that were capable of excreting large amounts of siderophore, but the composition of the medium limited its usefulness for ecological studies. A large proportion (71–79%) of the bacterial population that grew on a non-selective medium (tryptic soy agar) failed to grow on CAS agar, and several isolates that showed no sign of siderophore production on CAS agar produced siderophore in liquid culture. Similar populations of siderophore-producing bacteria were observed on roots of St. Augustine grass, which frequently exhibits Fe chlorosis, and bermuda grass, which does not. Roots of both grasses were colonized by bacteria that produced siderophore in vitro at concentrations ranging from 100 to 230 μM. The CAS assay solution was also used to compare siderophore production by Pseudomonas fluorescens Q6, an isolate from bermuda grass, and by P. putida B 10, a plant growth-promoting pseudomonad. P. fluorescens Q6 produced 2.4 times more siderophore in vitro than P. putida B 10.

Key words

Siderophores Rhizosphere bacteria Chrome azurol S reagent Fe dissolution Fe uptake 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander M (1977) Introduction to soil microbiology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker JO, Hedges RW, Messens E (1985) Inhibitory effect of pseudobactin on the uptake of iron by higher plants. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:1090–1093Google Scholar
  3. Buyer JS, Sikora LJ, Chaney RL (1989) A new growth medium for the study of siderophore-mediated interactions. Biol Fertil Soils 8:97–101Google Scholar
  4. Cline GR, Reid CPP, Szanislo PJ (1984) Effects of a hydroxamate siderophore on iron absorption by sunflower and sorghum. Plant Physiol 76:36–39Google Scholar
  5. Critchley IA, Basker MJ (1988) Conventional laboratory agar media provide an iron-limited environment for bacterial growth. FEMS Microbiol Lett 50:35–39Google Scholar
  6. Crowley DE, Reid CPP, Szanislo PJ (1987) Microbial siderophores as iron sources for plants. In: Winkelmann G, van der Helm D, Neilands JB (eds) Iron transport in microbes, plants and animals. VCH Publ, New York, pp 375–386Google Scholar
  7. Furia TE, Schenkel AG (1968) 2,4,4′-Trichloro-2′-hydroxydiphenyl ether: New, broad-spectrum bacteriostat. Soap Chem Spec, January, pp 47–50, 116–122Google Scholar
  8. Geels FP, Schmidt EDL, Schippers B (1985) The use of 8-hydroxy-quinoline for the isolation and prequalification of plant growth-stimulating rhizosphere pseudomonads. Biol Fertil Soils 1:167–173Google Scholar
  9. Hider RC (1984) Siderophore mediated absorption of iron. Struct Bonding 58:25–87Google Scholar
  10. Jones D (1988) Composition and properties of the family Enterobacteriaceae. J Appl Bacteriol (Symp Suppl) 1S–19SGoogle Scholar
  11. Lankford CE (1973) Bacterial assimilation of iron. Crit Rev Microbiol 2:273–331Google Scholar
  12. Leong J (1986) Siderophores: Their biochemistry and possible role in the biocontrol of plant pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 24:187–209Google Scholar
  13. Lindsay WL, Schwab AP (1982) The chemistry of iron in soils and its availability to plants. J Plant Nutr 5:821–840Google Scholar
  14. Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Meyer JM, Abdallah MA (1978) The fluorescent pigment of Pseudomonas fluorescens: Biosynthesis, purification and physicochemical properties. J Gen Microbiol 107:319–328Google Scholar
  16. Neilands JB (1981) Iron absorption and transport in microorganisms. Annu Rev Nutr 1:27–46Google Scholar
  17. Neilands JB (1982) Microbial envelope proteins related to iron. Annu Rev Microbiol 36:285–309Google Scholar
  18. Neilands JB (1984) Methodology of siderophores. Struct Bonding 58:1–24Google Scholar
  19. Schwyn B, Neilands JB (1987) Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal Biochem 160:47–56Google Scholar
  20. Teintze M, Leong J (1981) Structure of pseudobactin A, a second siderophore from plant growth promoting Pseudomonas B 10. Biochemistry 20:6457–6462Google Scholar
  21. Teintze M, Hossain MB, Barnes CL, Leong J, van der Helm D (1981) Structure of ferric pseudobactin, a siderophore from a plant growth promoting Pseudomonas. Biochemistry 20:6446–6456Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. B. Alexander
    • 1
  • D. A. Zuberer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Soil and Crop SciencesTexas A&M University, Texas Agricultural Experiment StationCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations