Advertisement

Computational Mechanics

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 275–282 | Cite as

Simultaneous optimization of controlled structures

  • M. Salama
  • J. Garba
  • L. Demsetz
  • F. Udwadia
Article

Abstract

A formulation is presented for finding the combined optimal design of a structural system and its control by defining a composite objective function as a linear combination of two components; a structural objective and a control objective. When the structural objective is a function of the structural design variables only, and when the control objective is represented by the quadratic functional of the response and control energy, it is possible to analytically express the optimal control in terms of any set of “admissible” structural design variables. Such expression for the optimal control is used recursively in an iterative Newton-Raphson search scheme, the goal of which is to determine the corresponding optimal set of structural design variables that minimize the combined objective function. A numerical example is given to illustrate the computational procedure. The results indicate that significant improvement of the combined optimal design can be achieved over the traditional separate optimization.

Keywords

Objective Function Information Theory Search Scheme Structural System Control Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Athans, M.; Falb, P. (1966): Optimal Control. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  2. Fleury, C. (1979): A unified approach to structural weight minimization. Computer Meth. in Appl. Mech. and Eng. Vol. 20, 17–38Google Scholar
  3. Fox, R.; Kapoor, M. (1968): Rate of change of eigenvalues and eigenvectors. AIAA J. 6/12, 2426–2429Google Scholar
  4. Hadley, G. (1964): Non-linear and dynamic programming. Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
  5. Hale, A.; Lisowski, R.; Dahl, W. (1983): Optimizing both the structure and the control of maneuvering flexible spacecrafts. Proc. AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Conf., Lake Placid, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Hanks, B.; Skelton, R. (1983): Designing structures for reduced response by modern control theory. Paper No. 83-0815, 24th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Structures, Struct. Dynamics, and Materials Conf., Lake Tahoe, NevadaGoogle Scholar
  7. Komkov, V. (1983): Simultaneous control and optimization for elastic systems. Proc. workshop on applications of distributed system theory to the control of large space structures, G. Rodriguez, ed., JPL Publ. 83-46, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  8. Messac, A.; Turner, J. (1984): Dual structural-control optimization of large space structures. Presented at the 25th AIAA/ ASME/ASCE/AHS Structures, Struct. Dynamics and Materials Conf., Dynamics Specialists Conf., Palm Springs, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  9. Nelson, R. (1976): Simplified calculation of eigenvector derivative. AIAA J. 14/9, 120–125Google Scholar
  10. Plant, R.; Huseyin, K. (1973): Derivatives of eigenvalues and eigenvectors in non- self- adjoint systems. AIAA J. 11/2, 250–251Google Scholar
  11. Venkayya, V.; Tischler, V. (1984): Frequency control and the effect on the dynamic response of flexible structures. Paper No. 84-1044-CP, 25th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Structures, Struct. Dynamics and Materials Conf., Dynamics Specialists Conf., Palm Springs, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Salama
    • 1
  • J. Garba
    • 1
  • L. Demsetz
    • 1
  • F. Udwadia
    • 2
  1. 1.Applied Technologies Section, Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA
  2. 2.Civil Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Decision SystemsUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations