Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 175–185 | Cite as

Aggregation in the lime aphid (Eucallipterus tiliae L.)

2. Social aggregation
  • N. A. C. Kidd
Article

Summary

Aggregation, shown by both nymphal and adult lime aphids, is not due to mutual tendency to select particular feeding sites, but is due to social aggregation, the aphids themselves being the attractive stimulus. In adults aggregation comes about through responses to visual stimuli from the wing patterns of other adults. Antennal contact between adults does not appear to be important in inducing settling, indicating that possibly visual or olfactory stimuli may be involved. With increased density closer spacing takes place resulting in increased antennal contact between adults and the possible significance of this is discussed. Closer spacing is not simply a result of limited space available at high densities but is self imposed by the adults themselves.

Keywords

Lime Settling Visual Stimulus Limited Space Close Spacing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bell, W.J., Parsons, C., Martinko, E.A.: Cockroach aggregation pheromones: Analysis of aggregation tendency and species specificity (Orthoptera: Blattidae). J. Kansas entomol. Soc. 45, 414–421 (1972)Google Scholar
  2. Campbell, D.J., Clarke, D.J.: Nearest neighbour tests of significance for non-randomness in the spacial distribution of singing crickets (Telogryllus commodus (Walker)). Anim. Behav. 19, 750–756 (1971)Google Scholar
  3. Clark, P.J., Evans, F.C.: Distance to nearest neighbour as a measure of spacial relationships in populations. Ecology 35, 445–453 (1954)Google Scholar
  4. Dahl, M.L.: Über einen Schreckstoff bei Aphiden. Dtch. entomol. Z. 18, 121–128 (1971)Google Scholar
  5. Dixon, A.F.G.: Population dynamics of the sycamore aphid, Drepanosiphum platanoides (Schr.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Migratory and trivial flight activity. J. anim. Ecol. 38, 585–606 (1969)Google Scholar
  6. Dixon, A.F.G.: Quality and availability of food for a sycamore aphid population. In: Animal populations in relation to their food resources (A. Watson, ed.), pp. 271–287. Oxford: Blackwell 1970Google Scholar
  7. Dixon, A.F.G., Wratten, S.D.: Laboratory studies on aggregation, size and fecundity in the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae (Scop.). Bull. ent. Res. 61, 97–111 (1971)Google Scholar
  8. Dixon, A.F.G., Logan, M.: Population density and spacing in the sycamore aphid, Drepanosiphum platanoides (Schr.) and its relevance to population growth. J. anim. Ecol. 41, 751–759 (1972)Google Scholar
  9. Ellis, P.E.: Social aggregation and gregarious behaviour in hoppers of Locusta migratoria migratorioides (R&F.) Behaviour 5, 225–227 (1953)Google Scholar
  10. Ellis, P.E.: Differences in social aggregation in 2 species of locust. Nature (Lond.) 178, 1007 (1956)Google Scholar
  11. Ellis, P.E.: Some factors influencing phase characters in nymphs of the locust Locusta migratoria migratorioides (R. & F.). Insectes Sociaux 6, 21–39 (1959)Google Scholar
  12. Gillett, S.: Airborne factor affecting the grouping behaviour of locusts. Nature (Lond.) 218, 782–783 (1968)Google Scholar
  13. Ibbotson, A., Kennedy, J.S.: Aggregation in Aphis fabae (Scop.). 1. Aggregation on plants. Ann. appl. Biol. 38, 65–78 (1951)Google Scholar
  14. Keenleyside, M.A.: Some aspects of the schooling behaviour of fish. Behaviour 8, 183–248 (1955)Google Scholar
  15. Kennedy, J.S., Crawley, L.: Spaced-out gregariousness in the sycamore aphid (Drepanosiphum platanoides). J. anim. Ecol. 36, 147–170 (1967)Google Scholar
  16. Kidd, N.A.C.: Aggregation in the lime aphid (Eucallipterus tiliae L.). 1. Leaf vein selection and its effect on distribution on the leaf. Oecologia (Berl.) 22, 299–304 (1976)Google Scholar
  17. Kislow, C.J., Edwards, L.J.: Repellent odours in aphids. Nature (Lond.) 235, 108–109 (1972)Google Scholar
  18. Lees, A.D.: The production of the apterous and alate forms in the aphid, Megoura viciae (Buckt.), with special reference to the role of crowding. J. Insect Physiol. 13, 289–318 (1966)Google Scholar
  19. Marsh, D.: Sex pheromone in the aphid Megoura viciae. Nature (Lond.) (New Biol.) 238, 79, 31–32 (1972)Google Scholar
  20. Marsh, D.: Responses of the aphids to the female sex pheromone in Megoura viciae Buckton. J. Ent. (A) 50 (1), 43–64 (1975)Google Scholar
  21. Nault, L.R., Edwards, L.J., Styer, W.E.: Aphid alarm pheromones: Secretion and reception. Environ. Entomol. 2, 101–105 (1973)Google Scholar
  22. Nolte, D.J., Eggers, S.H., May, I.R.: A locust pheromone: locustol. J. Insect Physiol. 19, 1547–1554 (1973)Google Scholar
  23. Pettersson, J.: An aphid sex attractant. I. Biological studies. Entomol. Scand. 1, 63–73 (1970)Google Scholar
  24. Roth, L.M., Willis, E.R.: The biotic associations of cockroaches. Smithsonian Misc. Coll. 141, 1–470 (1960)Google Scholar
  25. Tamaki, G., Butt, B.A., Landis, B.J.: Arrest and aggregation of male Myzus persicae. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 63, 955–960 (1970)Google Scholar
  26. Way, M.J., Banks, C.J.: Intra-specific mechanisms in relation to the natural regulation of numbers of Aphis fabae (Scop.). Ann. appl. Biol. 59, 189–205 (1967)Google Scholar
  27. Way, M.J., Cammell, M.: Aggregation behaviour in relation to food utilisation by aphids. In: Animal populations in relation to their food resources (A. Watson, ed.), pp. 229–247. Oxford: Blackwell 1970Google Scholar
  28. Wientjens, W.H.J.M., Lakwijk, A.C., van der Marel, T.: Alarm pheromone of grain aphids. Experientia (Basel) 29, 658–660 (1973)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. A. C. Kidd
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological ScienceKingston-upon-Hull College of EducationHullEngland

Personalised recommendations