Philosophical Studies

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 335–348 | Cite as

Sellars' argument for the inevitability of the secondary qualities

  • C. A. Hooker
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. [1]
    Cornman, J. W., ‘Sellars, Scientific Realism and Sensa’, Review of Metaphysics 23 (1970), 417–451.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Hooker, C. A., ‘A Realist Doctrine of Perception and a Nihilist Doctrine of the Secondary Qualities’, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9 (1976).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Hooker, C. A., ‘Systematic Realism’, Synthese 26 (1974), 409–497.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Hooker, C. A., ‘Systematic Philosophy and Meta-Philosophy of Science: Empiricism, Popperian and Realism’, Synthese 32 (1975), 177–231.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Hooker, C. A., ‘The Metaphysics of Science: Atoms versus Plena’, International Logic Review 9 (1974), 111–146.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Hooker, C. A., ‘The Non-necessity of Qualitative Content’, Dialogue 12 (1973), 447–453.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Sellars, W., ‘Science, Sense Impressions and Sensa: A reply to Cornman’, Review of Metaphysics 24 (1971), 391–447.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Sellars, W., Science Perception and Reality, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1963.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Sellars, W. Science and Metaphysics, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1970.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Sellars, W., ‘The Identity Approach to the Mind-Body Problem’, in R.S. Cohen and M. W. Wartofsky (eds.), Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science, 1962–1964, Humanities Press, New York, 1965.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. A. Hooker
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Western OntarioCanada

Personalised recommendations