Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 28, Issue 8, pp 2217–2226 | Cite as

Microstructural and magnetic characterization of alumina-iron nanocomposites

  • A. Marchand
  • X. Devaux
  • B. Barbara
  • P. Mollard
  • M. Brieu
  • A. Rousset
Papers
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Iron-alumina nanocomposite powders containing 10 wt % iron were prepared by selective reduction of alumina-haematite solid solutions. Microstructural study showed three types of metal dispersion in the alumina matrix according to the elaboration process: iron grains that were >70 nm, most of the iron particles were <10 nm and directly epitaxied in the alumina matrix, and iron particles that were surrounded by an interfacial phase. In agreement with transmission electron miscroscopy (TEM) observations, magnetic study confirmed a distribution of the iron particles size, showing the superposition of a ferromagnetic behaviour (larger particles) and a superantiferromagnetic behaviour (smaller particles). Furthermore, analysis of thermoremanent behaviour, coercive field and dissymmetry of hysteresis loops allowed the interfacial phase surrounding some iron particles to be identified as an antiferromagnetic phase, Fe1+xAl2−xO4. Nevertheless, at the interface of metallic iron epitaxied on the alumina matrix some atomic planes always existed where iron was ionic (even if no other phase was detected). As a consequence the mean magnetic moment of iron in these nanocrystals is larger than that in bulk metallic iron.

Keywords

Iron Solid Solution Hysteresis Loop Alumina Matrix Coercive Field 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    L. NÉEL, C.R. Hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci. Paris 228 (1949) 664.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. NÉEL, Ann. Geophys. 5 (1949) 99.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. P. BEAN, J. Appl. Phys. 26 (1955) 1381.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. KITTEL, Phys.Rev. 70 (1946) 965.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    I. S. JACOBS and C. P. BEAN, in “Magnetism III”, edited by G. T. RADO and H. SUHL (Academic Press, New York, 1963) p. 271.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. L. DORMANN, Revue Phys. Appl. 16 (1981) 275.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. W. SELWOOD, “Adsorption and Collective Paramagnetism” (Academic Press, New York, 1962).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. A. MARTIN, N. CEAPHALAU, P. De MONTGOLFIER and B. IMELIK, J. Chim. Phys. 70 (1973) 1422.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. T. RICHARDSON, J. Appl. Phys. 49 (1978) 1781.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. J. FREEMAN and C. L. FU, ibid. 61 (1987) 3356.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. N. LIBERMANN, D. R. FREDKIN and H. B. SHORE, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22 (1969) 539.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. N. LIBERMANN, J. CLINTON, P. M. EDARDS and J. MATHON, ibid. 25 (1970) 232.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. OHNISHI, A. J. FREEMAN and M. WEINERT, Phys. Rev. B28 (1983) 6741.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. M. PASTOR, J. DORANTE-DAVILA and K. M. BENNEMAN, ibid. B40 (1989) 7642.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. MATSUO and I. J. NISHIDA, Phys. Soc. Jpn. 49 (1980) 1005.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. ROUSSET and X. DEVAUX, French Patent 90 09790 (1990).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. A. IMLACH and F. P. GLASSER, Trans. J. Brit. Ceram. Soc. 70 (1971) 227.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. B. OGALE, D. M. PHASE, S. M. CHAUDARI, S. V. GHAISAS, S. M. KANETKAR, P. P. PATIL, V. G. BHIDE and S. K. DATE, Phys. Rev. B35 (1987) 1593.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. ANTON, K. HEINEMANN and H. POPPA, Vide Couches Minces 201 (1980) 121.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. B. QADRI, J. H. CLAASSEN, P. R. BROUSSARD and S. A. WOLF, J. Less-Common Metals 155 (1989) 327.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. P. REBOUILLAT, Thése d'Etat, Université de Grenoble (1972).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. H. M. STOELINGA, R. GERSDORF and G. De VRIES, Physica 41 (1969) 457.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    S. FONER, A. J. FREEMAN, N. A. BLUM, R. B. FRANKEL, E. J. MCNIFF and H. C. PRADDANDE, Phys. Rev. 181 (1969) 863.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. MARCHAND, X. DEVAUX, B. BARBARA, P. MOLLARD and A. ROUSSET, to be published.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    B. BARBARA, J. FILIPPI, A. MARCHAND, P. MOLLARD, X. DEVAUX and A. ROUSSET, J. Phys., Paris 2 (1992) 101.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    B. BARBARA, A. MARCHAND, P. MOLLARD, X. DEVAUX and A. ROUSSET, in International Workshop on Studies of Magnetic Properties of Fine Particles and Their Relevance to Materials Science, Rome, 4–8 November, 1991.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Idem, to be published.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    L. NÉEL, Ann. Phys. 2 (1967) 61.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    W. L. RUTH, J. Phys., Paris 25 (1964) 507.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    S. J. PICKARD and A. C. TURNOCK, Phys. Chem. Solids 10 (1959) 242.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    W. H. MEIKLEJOHN and C. P. BEAN, Phys. Rev. 102 (1956) 1413.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Idem, ibid. 105 (1957) 904.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Marchand
    • 1
    • 2
  • X. Devaux
    • 1
    • 2
  • B. Barbara
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. Mollard
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Brieu
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. Rousset
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Magnétisme Louis NéelCNRSGrenoble Cedex 9France
  2. 2.Laboratoire de Chimie des Matériaux InorganiquesUniversité Paul SabatierToulouse CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations