Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 391–399 | Cite as

Optimum illumination for ground squirrel activity

  • J. Lee Kavanau
  • Carl E. Rischer
Article

Summary

The locomotor activity of four antelope ground squirrels was monitored in an activity-wheel enclosure at illuminance levels from 1.1 to 30000 lux and color temperatures from 1950 to 2860°K. The time spent running, speed of running, and length of non-stop running sessions were found to be sensitive to ambient light conditions. Time showed the greatest dependence and appears to peak between 1300 and 17000 lux, the latter value corresponding roughly to light conditions attained within 30 minutes after natural sunrise and before sunset. Running speed was influenced least but in the most highly consistent manner, appearing to peak between 2600 and 17000 lux. Session lengths were quite variable and showed the most complex changes with light level. The overall findings suggest that the squirrels also were influenced by color temperature. There were large individual differences in various aspects of the responses.

Keywords

Color Individual Difference Light Condition Locomotor Activity Light Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blair, W. F.: Activities of Peromyscus with relation to light intensity. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 7, 92–97 (1943).Google Scholar
  2. Crescitelli, F., Pollack, J. D.: Color vision in the antelope ground squirrel. Science 150, 1316–1318 (1965).Google Scholar
  3. Falls, J. B.: Activity and local distribution of deer mice in relation to certain environmental factors. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Toronto (1953).Google Scholar
  4. Kavanau, J. L.: Automatic multi-channel sensing and recording of animal behavior. Ecology 43, 161–166 (1962a).Google Scholar
  5. —: Twilight transitions and biological rhythmicity. Nature (Lond.) 194, 1293–1295 (1962b).Google Scholar
  6. —: Continuous automatic monitoring of the activities of small captive animals. Ecology 44, 95–110 (1963).Google Scholar
  7. —: Automatic monitoring of the activities of small mammals. In: Systems analysis in ecology (K. E. F. Watt, ed.), p. 99–146. New York: Academic Press, Inc. 1966.Google Scholar
  8. —: Activity and orientational responses of white-footed mice to light. Nature (Lond.) 218, 245–252 (1968).Google Scholar
  9. —: Influences of light on activity of small mammals. Ecology 50, 548–557 (1969).Google Scholar
  10. Stinson, R. H.: Effects of some environmental factors on the behavior of Peromyscus. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto (1952).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Lee Kavanau
    • 1
  • Carl E. Rischer
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Long Beach City CollegeLong BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations