Orienting properties of discotic nematic liquid crystals in Jeffrey-Hamel flows
- 75 Downloads
- 18 Citations
Abstract
The orienting properties of incompressible discotic nematic liquid crystals for creeping flows between converging and diverging planar walls (Jeffrey-Hamel) are analyzed using the Leslie-Ericksen theory. The dependence of director orientation on the reactive parameter λ and the flow kinematics is presented. Closed form stationary solutions for the director orientation are found when elastic effects are neglected. Stationary numerical solutions for the velocity and director fields using the full Leslie-Ericksen theory are presented. The director field in converging flow is characterized by azimuthal (radial) centerline orientation, by being asymmetric with respect to the azimuthal (radial) direction, and by having an allowed orientation range that spans two half-quadrants (full quadrants). In the limiting case of perfectly flat disk (λ ⇒ −∞) the flow-induced director orientation in converging flow is the azimuthal direction, while in diverging flow the director rotates by a full n radians. By reducing the vertex angle between the walls to vanishingly small values, converging flow solutions properly reduce to those of flow between parallel plates, but diverging flows are expected to lead to a new instability.
Key words
Discotic-nematic liquid crystals Jeffrey-Hamel flows orienting properties reactive parameterPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Gasparoux H (1981) Mol Cryst Liq Cryst 63:231–248Google Scholar
- 2.Chandrasekhar S (1981) Mol Cryst Liq Cryst 63:171–180Google Scholar
- 3.Destrade C, Tinh NH, Gasparoux H, Malthete J, Levelut AM (1981) Mol Cryst Liq Cryst 71:11–135Google Scholar
- 4.Singer LS (1985) Faraday Discuss. Chem Soc 73:265–272Google Scholar
- 5.Otani S (1981) Mol Cryst Liq Cryst 63:249–264Google Scholar
- 6.Chandrasekhar S (1982) In: Brown HG (ed) Advances in Liquid Crystals vol 5. Academic Press, New York, pp 47–78Google Scholar
- 7.Zimmer JE, White JL (1982) In: Brown HG (ed) Advances in Liquid Crystals vol 5. Academic Press, New York, pp 157–213Google Scholar
- 8.Lacerda Santos MB, Galerne Y, Durand G (1985) J Physique 46:933–937Google Scholar
- 9.Sollich H, Baals D, Hess S (1989) Mol Cryst Liq Cryst 168:189–195Google Scholar
- 10.Forster D (1974) Phys Rev Lett 32:1161–1164Google Scholar
- 11.Volovik GE (1980) JETP Lett 31:273–275Google Scholar
- 12.Carlsson T (1982) Mol Cryst Liq Cryst 89:57–66Google Scholar
- 13.Baals H, Hess S (1988) Z Naturforsch 43A:662–670Google Scholar
- 14.Carlsson T (1983) J Physique 44:909–911Google Scholar
- 15.Leslie FM (1979) In: Brown HG (ed) Advances in Liquid Crystals vol 4. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–81Google Scholar
- 16.Rey AD, Denn MM (1988) J Non Newt Fluid Mech 27:375–401Google Scholar
- 17.Rey AD, Denn MM (1989) Liquid Crystals 4:253–272Google Scholar
- 18.Vertogen G, de Jeu WH (1988) Thermotropic Liquid Crystals, Chemical Physics Series 45. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 103–105 and pp 147–153Google Scholar
- 19.de Gennes PG (1975) The Physics of Liquid Crystals. Oxford University Press, London, pp 153–165Google Scholar
- 20.Miesowicz M (1946) Nature 158:27Google Scholar
- 21.Chandrasekhar S (1977) Liquid Crystals. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 134–136Google Scholar
- 22.Raghunathan VA, Madhusudana NY, Chandrasekhar S (1987) Mol Cryst Liq Cryst 66:103–114Google Scholar
- 23.Currie PK (1977) Rheol Acta 16:205–212Google Scholar
- 24.Zuniga I, Leslie FM (1989) J Non Newt Fluid Mech 33:123–136Google Scholar
- 25.Denn MM (1980) Process Fluid Mechanics. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, p 217Google Scholar