Child's Nervous System

, Volume 12, Issue 11, pp 654–663 | Cite as

Metopic synostosis: in favour of a “simplified” surgical treatment

  • C. Di Rocco
  • F. Velardi
  • A. Ferrario
  • E. Marchese
Original Paper

Abstract

Metopic synostosis is a relatively simple form of craniosynostosis, resulting from premature fusion of the metopic suture. In this pathology different degrees of dysmorphia of the anterior cranial fossa and the presence of associated anomalies of the skull might enable specific subgroups to be identified. Since most functional and cosmetic anomalies benefit from early surgical treatment, over the last few years neurosurgeons have been forced to elaborate less drastic, but nonetheless effective, surgical techniques. In the present report we analyze the surgical results obtained in a series of 62 infants with trigonocephaly operated on within their 1st year of life. Patients were subdivided into two groups (group I: 8 patients; group II: 54 patients) according to the specific dysmorphic characteristics of the frontal bone and anterior cranial fossa, and the presence of compensatory deformities affecting the anterior cranial base and temporo-parietal region. All the patients were treated using one of two relatively simple surgical techniques (procedure A: inversion of two hemifrontal bone flaps-48 cases; procedure B: the “shell” operation-14 cases). Both surgical procedures appeared to be effective, allowing adequate functional and cosmetic correction of the cranial deformity. In patients operated on following procedure B surgical time and and blood loss were dramatically reduced. Long-term outcomes were satisfactory in all cases, irrespective of the surgical technique used. In the group II patients, however, progressive normalization of the interorbital distance was constantly observed, suggesting a different degree of stenotic involvement at the level of the anterior cranial base in these patients.

Key words

Craniosynostosis Trigonocephaly Skull base Surgical technique “Shell” operation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Albin RE, Hendee WR, O'Donnell SR, Majure JA (1985) Trigonocephaly: refinements in reconstruction. Experience with 33 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 76:202–209Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson FM (1981) Treatment of coronal and metopic synostosis: 107 cases. Neurosurgery 8:143–149Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cohen SR, Kawamoto HK Jr, Burstein F, Peacock J (1991) Advancement-onlay: an improved technique of fronto-orbital remodeling in craniosynostosis. Child's Nerv Syst 7:264–271Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Czorny A, Ricbourg B, Bizette C, Godard J, Jacquet G (1994) Le remodelage de la voute du crane des craniostenoses anterieures. Techniques personelles de traitment des trigonoeephalies et des plagiocephalies. Neurochirurgie 40:222–226Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Delashaw JB, Persing JA, Park TS, Jane JA (1986) Surgical approaches for the correction of metopic synostosis. Neurosurgery 19:228–233Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dhellemmes P, Pellerin P, Lejcune JP, Lepoutre F (1986) Surgical treatment of trigonocephaly. Experience with 30 cases. Child's Nerv Syst 2:228–232Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Di Rocco C, Velardi F (1984) Surgical management of craniosynostosis. In: Galli G (ed) Craniosynostosis, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, pp 181–247Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Di Rocco C, Marchese E, Velardi F (1989) Crahiosinostosi metopica. Minerva Pediatrica 41:559–564Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Di Rocco C, Marchese E, Velardi F (1989) Trigonocephaly. J Pediatr Neurosci 5:241–255Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frydman M, Kauschansky A, Elian E (1984) Trigonocephaly: a new familial syndrome. Am J Med Genet 18:55–59Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Genitori L, Cavalheiro G, Lena G, Dollo C, Choux M (1991) Skull base in trigonocepahly. Pediatr Neurosurg 17:175–181Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hunter AGW, Rudd NL, Hoffman HJ (1976) Trigonocephaly and associated minor anomalies in mother and son. J Med Genet 13:77–79Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Madeline LA, Elster AD (1995) Suture closure in the human chondrocranium: CT assessment. Radiology 196:747–756Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Madeline LA, Elster AD (1995) Postnatal developmental of the central skull base: normal variants. Radiology 196:757–763Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maggi G, Petrone G, Aliberti F, Pittore L (1993) The operative treatment of craniosynostosis using bone plate and screw fixation (titanium micro system). J Neurosurg Sci 37:157–160Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marchac D (1978) Radical forehead remodeling for craniostenosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 61:823–835Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marsh JL, Schwartz HG (1983) The surgical correction of coronal and metopic craniosynostoses. J Neurosurg 59:245–251Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mutluer S, Songur E (1990) A new technique for correction of metopic suture synostosis. Child's Nerv Syst 6:317–321Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oi S, Matsumoto S (1987) Trigonocephaly (metopic synostosis). Clinical, surgical and anatomical concepts. Child's Nerv Syst 3:259–265Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pershing J, Babler W, Winn R, Jane J, Rodeheaver G (1981) Age as a critical factor in the success of surgical correction of craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 54:601–606Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Posnick JC, Lin KY, Chen P, Amstrong D (1994) Metopic synostosis: quantitative assessment of presenting deformity and surgical results based on CT scans. Plast Reconstr Surg 93:16–24Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sadove MA, Kalsbeck JE, Eppley BL, Javed T (1990) Modification in the surgical correction of trigonocephaly. Plast Reconstr Surg 85:853–858Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sato K, Uemura T, Hamajima A, Iwata T (1994) Cranial reshaping of rate concordant dizygotic twins with trigonocephaly. Plast Reconstr Surg 93:172–177Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Say B, Meyer J (1981) Familial trigonocephaly associated with short stature and developmental delay. Am J Dis Child 135:711–712Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shillito J Jr, Matson DD (1968) Craniosynostosis — a review of 519 patients. Pediatrics 41:829–853Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sullivan PK, Melsen B, Mulliken JB (1990) Calvarial sutural abnormalities: metopic synostosis and coronal deformation — an anatomic, three-dimensional radiographic, and pathologic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:1072–1077Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Di Rocco
    • 1
  • F. Velardi
    • 1
  • A. Ferrario
    • 1
  • E. Marchese
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Pediatric NeurosurgeryCatholic University Medical SchoolRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations