Oecologia

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 171–193 | Cite as

Dispersal of deer mice, Peromyscus maniculatus

Proximal causes and effects on fitness
  • Daphne J. Fairbairn
Article

Summary

Dispersal of deer mice, Peromyscus maniculatus, was measured as immigration to and emigration from two control areas, and as immigration to a removal area. The number of mice dispersing was linearly related to the densities on the control areas, while the proportion of the population dispersing (rate of dispersal) was correlated primarily with the rate of increase of control populations. High rates of dispersal were also associated with a breakdown of the established social structure in the spring and fall. Dispersing animals were compared to residents with respect to sex ratio, weight, age, and breeding condition. The types of animals dispersing varied seasonally: light-weight, non-breeding males dispersed in the spring and summer; juveniles and breeding males dispersed at the end of the breeding season; and light-weight mice of both sexes dispersed over the winter. It is proposed that the animals that dominated the dispersal samples each season were moving in response to social pressure from residents, or local limitations of some resource, and thus, that dispersal was adaptive for the individuals concerned. Some tests of the hypotheses concerning resource limitation are suggested.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fairbairn, D.J.: Population processes in Peromyscus: An experimental approach. Ph. D. thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (1976)Google Scholar
  2. Fairbairn, D.J.: The spring decline in deer mice: death or dispersal? Can. J. Zool. 55, 84–92 (1977a)Google Scholar
  3. Fairbairn, D.J.: Why breed early? A study of reproductive tactics in Peromyscus. Can. J. Zool. 55, 862–871 (1977b)Google Scholar
  4. Fairbairn, D.J.: Behaviour of dispersing deer mice. Behavioral Ecol. Sociobiol. (in press, 1978)Google Scholar
  5. Gadgil, M.: Dispersal: population consequences and evolution. Ecol. 52, 253–261 (1971)Google Scholar
  6. Garten, C.T., Smith, M.H.: Movement by oldfield mice and population regulation. Acta Theriologica 19, 513–514 (1974)Google Scholar
  7. Gashwiler, J.S.: Seed fall of three conifers in west-central Oregon. Forest Sci. 15, 290 (1969)Google Scholar
  8. Gillespie, J.H.: The role of migration in the genetic structure of populations in temporally and spatially varying environments. 1. Conditions for polymorphism. Am. Nat. 109, 127–135 (1966)Google Scholar
  9. Healey, M.C.: Aggression and self-regulation in a population of deermice. Ecology 48, 377–392 (1967)Google Scholar
  10. Hedrick, P.W., Ginevan, M.E., Ewing, E.P.: Genetic polymorphism in heterogeneous environments. Ann. Rev. Ecol. System. 7, 1–32 (1976)Google Scholar
  11. Howard, W.E.: Dispersal, amount of inbreeding, and longevity in a local population of prairie deermice on the George Reserve, Southern Michigan. Univ. Mich. Contrib. Lab. Biol. 43, 1–52 (1949)Google Scholar
  12. Howard, W.E.: Innate and environmental dispersal of individual vertebrates. Am. Midl. Nat. 63, 152–161 (1960)Google Scholar
  13. Jameson, E.W., Jr.: Food of deer mice Peromyscus maniculatus and P. boylei in the northern Sierra Nevada, California. J. Mamm. 33, 50–60 (1952)Google Scholar
  14. Jameson, E.W., Jr.: Some factors affecting fluctuations of Microtus and Peromyscus. J. Mamm. 36, 206–209 (1955)Google Scholar
  15. Janzen, D.H.: Host plants as islands in evolutionary and contemporary time. Am. Nat. 102, 592–594 (1968)Google Scholar
  16. Joule, J., Cameron, G.N.: Species removal studies I. Dispersal strategies of sympatric Sigmodon hispidus and Reithrodontomys fulvescens populations. J. Mamm. 56, 378–396 (1975)Google Scholar
  17. Krebs, C.J., Wingate, J., LeDuc, J., Redfield, J.A., Taitt, M., Hiborn, R.: Microtus population biology: dispersal in fluctuating populations of M. townsendii. Can. J. Zool. 54, 79–95 (1976)Google Scholar
  18. Levin, S.A.: Population dynamic models in heterogeneous environments. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7, 287–310 (1976)Google Scholar
  19. Levin, S.A., Paine, R.T.: Disturbance, patch formation, and community structure. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 2744–2747 (1974)Google Scholar
  20. Lidicker, W.Z.: The role of dispersal in the demography of small mammals. In: Small mammals: productivity and dynamics of populations (K. Petrusewicz, F.B. Golley, L. Ryszkowski, eds.), Chpt. 5. New York-London: Cambridge Univ. Press 1975Google Scholar
  21. Myers, J., Krebs, C.J.: Genetic, behavioral and reproductive attributes of dispersing field voles Microtus pennsylvanicus and Microtus ochrogaster. Ecol. Mono. 41, 53–78 (1971)Google Scholar
  22. Petticrew, B.G., Sadleir, R.M.F.S.: The ecology of the deer mouse Peromyscus mainculatus in a coastal coniferous forest. I. Population dynamics. Can. J. Zool. 52, 107–118 (1974)Google Scholar
  23. Reddingius, J., den Boer, P.J.: Simulation experiments illustrating stabilization of numbers by spreading of risk. Oecologia (Berl.) 5, 240–284 (1970)Google Scholar
  24. Roff, D.A.: Spatial heterogeneity and the persistence of populations. Oecologia (Berl.) 15, 245–258 (1974a)Google Scholar
  25. Roff, D.A.: The analysis of a population model demonstrating the importance of dispersal in a heterogeneous environment. Oecologia (Berl.) 15, 259–275 (1974b)Google Scholar
  26. Roff, D.A.: Population stability and the evolution of dispersal in a heterogeneous environment. Oecologia (Berl.) 19, 217–237 (1975)Google Scholar
  27. Sadleir, R.M.F.S.: The relationship between agonistic behavior and population changes in the deermouse, Peromyscus maniculatus. J. Anim. Ecol. 34, 331–352 (1965)Google Scholar
  28. Sheppe, W.: Island populations and gene flow in the deer mouse, Peromyscus leucopus. Evolution 19, 480–495 (1965)Google Scholar
  29. Sheppe, W.: Determinants of home range in the deer mouse, Peromyscus leucopus. Calif. Acad. Sci. 24, 377–418 (1966)Google Scholar
  30. Smith, M.H.: Dispersal of the old-field mouse, Peromyscus polionotus. Bull. Georgia Acad. Sci. 26, 45–51 (1968)Google Scholar
  31. Stickel, L.F.: The source of animals moving into a depopulated area. J. Mamm. 27, 301–307 (1946)Google Scholar
  32. Stickel, L.F.: Home range and travels. In: Biology of Peromyscus (J.A. King, ed.), pp. 373–411. Spec. Publ. No. 2, Am. Soc. Mammal. (1968)Google Scholar
  33. Southwood, T.R.E.: Migration of terrestrial arthropods in relation to habitat. Biol. Rev. 27, 171–214 (1962)Google Scholar
  34. Sullivan, T.P.: Demography and dispersal in island and mainland populations of the deer mouse, Peromyscus maniculatus. Masters Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (1976)Google Scholar
  35. Terman, C.K.: Population dynamics. In: Biology of Peromyscus (J.A. King, ed.), pp. 412–450. Spec. Publ. No. 2, Am. Soc. Mammal. (1968)Google Scholar
  36. Van Valen, L.: Group selection and the evolution of dispersal. Evolution 25, 591–598 (1971)Google Scholar
  37. Wallace, B.: Topics in population genetics, pp. 79–98. Norton 1968Google Scholar
  38. Watson, A., Moss, R.: Dominance, spacing behaviour and aggression in relation to population limitation in vertebrates. In: Animal populations in relation to their food resources (A. Watson, ed.), pp. 167–220. British Ecol. Soc. No. 10 (1970)Google Scholar
  39. Weins, J.A.: Population responses to patchy environments. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7, 81–120 (1976)Google Scholar
  40. Williams, G.C.: Adaptation and natural selection: A critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton, N.Y.: Princeton Univ. Press 1966Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daphne J. Fairbairn
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Animal Resource EcologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations