, Volume 104, Issue 1, pp 93–100

Field and genetic studies testing optimal outcrossing in Agave schottii, a long-lived clonal plant

  • A-M. Trame
  • A. J. Coddington
  • K. N. Paige
Original Paper


In thisstudy we combine field experiments, designed to test the predictions of optimal outcrossing theory in Agave schottii, with molecular genetic studies, using RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA), polymerase chain reaction to assess the underlying genetic hypothesis of optimal outcrossing theory. Initially, 48 “females” of A. schottii were hand-pollinated with pollen collected from 1 m, 10 m, 100 m, and 2500 m distances. Each female received all four distance treatments. Additionally, a subset of the focal females and their pollen donors were used in an analysis of genetic similarity across the four distances. Results of hand-pollinations showed that crosses of 1 m had significantly lower seed set than 10 m and 100 m crosses. Crosses of 2500 m had intermediate seed set. Combined relative fitness was significantly lower for 1 m crosses compared to 10 m crosses, while 100 m and 2500 m crosses were intermediate. Thus, A. schottii experiences inbreeding depression and a trend toward outbreeding depression. Genetic analyses showed a similar pattern: individuals 1 m apart had on average higher genetic similarity (proportion of bands shared) than individuals separated by greater distances, with a trend toward lower genetic similarity for plants located 2500 m distant. The observed spatial genetic patterns are likely maintained by the combined effects of clonal reproduction, clone longevity, limited seed dispersal and the substantial number of inbred progeny produced, counteracting distant allele transfer which tends to reduce population genetic structure. The correspondence between our ecological and genetic results indicates that RAPD markers are useful tools for assessing ecological phenomena.

Key words

Optimal outcrossing Agave schottii Clonal reproduction Inbreeding and outbreeding depression RAPDs 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agren J, Schemske DW (1993) Outcrossing rate and inbreeding depression in two annual monoecious herbs, Begonia hirsuta and B. semivata. Evolution 47:125–135Google Scholar
  2. Allard RW (1975) The mating system and microevolution. Genetics 79:115–126Google Scholar
  3. Allard RW, Babbel GR, Clegg MT, Kahler AL (1972) Evidence for co-adaptation in Avena barbata. Proc Natl Acad Sci 69:3034–3048Google Scholar
  4. Banyard BJ, James SH (1979) Biosystematic studies in the Stylidium crassifolium species complex (Stylidiaceae). Aust J Bot 27:27–37Google Scholar
  5. Barrett SCH, Kohn JR (1991) Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE (eds) Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–30Google Scholar
  6. Carthew SM (1993) Population genetic structure of Banksia spinulosa. Heredity 70:566–573Google Scholar
  7. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:237–268Google Scholar
  8. Dobzhansky T (1970) Genetics of the evolutionary process. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Dudash MR (1990) Relative fitness of selfed and outcrossed progeny in a self-compatible, protandrous species, Sabatia angularis L. (Gentianaceae): a comparison in three environments. Evolution 44:1129–1139Google Scholar
  10. Endler JA (1977) Geographic variation, speciation, and clines. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  11. Fenster CB (1991) Gene flow in Chamaecrista fasciculata (Leguminosae). II. Gene establishment. Evolution 45:410–422Google Scholar
  12. Galen C, Shore JS, Deyoe H (1991) Ecotypic divergence in alpine Polemonium viscosum: genetic structure, quantitative variation, and local adaptation. Evolution 45:1218–1228Google Scholar
  13. Gentry HS (1982) Agaves of continental North America. University of Arizona Press, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  14. Grant V (1975) Genetics of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Gregorius HR, Krauhausen J, Muller-Starck G (1986) Spatial and temporal genetic differentiation among the seed in a stand of Fagus sylvatica L. Heredity 57:255–262Google Scholar
  16. Hadrys H, Balick M, Schierwater B (1992) Applications of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) in molecular biology. Mol Ecol 1:55–63Google Scholar
  17. Keim P, Paige KN, Whitham TG, Lark KG (1989) Genetic analysis of an interspecific hybrid swarm of Populus: occurence of unidirectional introgression. Genetics 123:557–565Google Scholar
  18. Koptur S (1984) Outcrossing and pollinator limitation of fruit set: breeding systems of neotropical Inga trees (Fabaceae: Mimosoideae). Evolution 38:1130–1143Google Scholar
  19. Lande R, Schemske DW (1985) The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39:24–40Google Scholar
  20. Levin DA (1984) Inbreeding depression and proximity-dependent crossing success in Phlox drummondii. Evolution 38:116–127Google Scholar
  21. Levin DA, Kerster HW (1974) Gene flow in seed plants. Evol Biol 7:139–220Google Scholar
  22. Linhart YB, Mitton JB, Sturgeon KB, Davis ML (1981) Genetic variation in space and time in a population of ponderosa pine. Heredity 46:407–426Google Scholar
  23. Lloyd DG (1979) Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. Am Nat 113:67–79Google Scholar
  24. Loveless MD, Hamrick JL (1984) Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:65–95Google Scholar
  25. Lynch M (1991) The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 45:622–629Google Scholar
  26. McMahon JA (1988) Warm deserts. In: Barbour MG, Billings WD (eds) North American Terrestrial Vegetation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 232–264Google Scholar
  27. Mayr E (1963) Animal species and evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  28. McCall C, Mitchell-Olds T, Waller DM (1988) Might a plant that often selfs have an optimal out-crossing distance? Bull Ecol Soc Am 69:223–224Google Scholar
  29. McNeilly T, Antonovics J (1968) Evolution in closely adjacent populations. IV. Barriers to gene flow. Heredity 23:205–218Google Scholar
  30. Paige KN, Capman WC (1993) The effects of host-plant genotype, hybridization, and environment on gall-aphid attack and survival in cottonwood: the importance of genetic studies and the utility of RFLPs. Evolution 47:36–45Google Scholar
  31. Price MV, Waser NM (1979) Pollen dispersal and optimal outcrossing in Delphinium nelsoni. Nature 277:294–297Google Scholar
  32. Redmond AM, Robbins LE, Travis J (1989) The effects of pollination distance on seed set in three populations of Amianthum muscaetoxicum (Liliaceae). Oecologia 79:260–264Google Scholar
  33. Richards AJ (1986) Plant breeding systems. Allen and Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Ritland K, Ganders FR (1985) Variation in the mating system of Bidens menzeiesii (Asteraceae) in relation to population substructure. Heredity 55:235–244Google Scholar
  35. Ritland K, Ganders FR (1987) Crossibility of Mimulus guttatus in relation to components of gene fixation. Evolution 41:772–786Google Scholar
  36. Schaal BA (1975) Population structure and local differentiation in Liatris cylindracea. Am Nat 109:511–528Google Scholar
  37. Schemske DW, Paulter LP (1984) The effects of pollen composition on fitness components in a neotropical herb. Oecologia 62:31–36Google Scholar
  38. Shields WM (1982) Philopatry, inbreeding, and the evolution of Sex. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  39. Sobrevila C (1988) Effects of distance between pollen donor and pollen recipient on fitness components in Espeletia schultzii. Am J Bot 75:701–724Google Scholar
  40. Solbrig OT, Simpson BB (1974) Components of regulation of a population of dandelions in Michigan. J Ecol 62:473–486Google Scholar
  41. Solbrig OT, Simpson BB (1977) A garden experiment on competition between biotypes of the common dandelion (Taraxacum officinale). J Ecol 65:427–430Google Scholar
  42. Statistical Graphics Corporation (1987) Statgraphics: statistical graphics system. STSC, Rockville MdGoogle Scholar
  43. Svensson L (1988) Inbreeding, crossing, and variation in stamen number in Scleranthus annuus (Caryophyllaceae), a selfing annual. Evol Trends Plants 2:31–37Google Scholar
  44. Turner ME, Stephens JC, Anderson WW (1982) Homozygosity and patch structure in plant populations as a result of nearest neighbor pollination. Proc Natl Acad Sci 70:203–207Google Scholar
  45. Van Treuren R, Bijlsma R, Van Delden W, Ouborg NJ (1991) The significance of genetic erosion in the process of extinction. I. Genetic differentiation in Salvia pratensis and Scabiosa columbaria in relation to population size. Heredity 66:181–189Google Scholar
  46. Waser NM (1982) A comparison of distances flown by different visitors to flowers of the same species. Oecologia 55:251–257Google Scholar
  47. Waser NM (1987) Spatial genetic heterogenity in a population of the montane perennial plant, Delphinium nelsoni. Heredity 58:249–256Google Scholar
  48. Waser NM (1993) Population structure, optimal outbreeding, and assortative mating in angiosperms. In: Thornhill NW (ed) The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding: theoretical and empirical perspectives. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 173–199Google Scholar
  49. Waser NM, Price MV (1983) Optimal and actual outcrossing in plants, and the nature of plant-pollinator interaction. In: Jones CE, Little RJ (eds) Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 341–359Google Scholar
  50. Waser NM, Price MV (1989) Optimal outcrossing in Ipomopsis aggregata: seed set and offspring fitness. Evolution 43:1097–1109Google Scholar
  51. Waser NM, Price MV (1995) Crossing distance effects in Delphinium nelsoni: outbreeding and inbreeding depression in progeny fitness. Evolution (in press)Google Scholar
  52. Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV (1990) DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:6531–6535Google Scholar
  53. Wilkinson L (1990) Systat, the system for statistics. Systat, Evanston, IllGoogle Scholar
  54. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  55. Ziehe M, Roberds JH (1989) Inbreeding depression due to overdominance in partially self-fertilizing plant populations. Genetics 121:861–868Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • A-M. Trame
    • 1
  • A. J. Coddington
    • 1
  • K. N. Paige
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Environmental Studies, Department of Ecology, Ethology, and EvolutionUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.USA-CERLChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations