Biological Cybernetics

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 91–106 | Cite as

The courtship tracking of Drosophila melanogaster

  • Robert Cook
Article

Abstract

The courtship of male Drosophila melanogaster, which occurs so far as is known exclusively on the ground, may be regarded as a tracking process upon which are superimposed specific elements of courtship behaviour. Two methods were utilised to study this process, both of which involved the use of a fixed female courtship stimulus. The male courted this female whilst 1. running on the moving floor of a revolving chamber (female stationary) and 2. tracking her as she was rotated on a radius in a stationary chamber. Behaviour in the first apparatus was recorded via an electronic eye watching the flies and a keyboard operated by the experimenter. Behaviour in the second apparatus was filmed and subsequently analysed frame by frame. The patterning of courtship around the female was shown to be limited by the velocity at which the male had to run in order to court the female. At lower velocities more excursions (“circling”) to the side of the female were made. The mean distance of the male behind the female increased with velocity. The slope of this effect provides an estimate of the reciprocal feedback gain of the control system for tracking. Strain and velocity dependent differences in courtship variables were revealed. The proportion of wing extension emitted in tracking varied widely, the lowest value being shown by the strain which tracked the fastest (WT Kapelle). It is proposed that the relation between these two variables is of fundamental importance in determining the outcome of courtship. Using females moving sideways it was demonstrated that males orientate to the abdomen in close range of the female (<4 mm centre to centre), and more centrally at greater distance, where visual stimuli probably dominate as cues to orientation. Sinusoidal modulation of the female's velocity enabled a preliminary stimulus-response analysis of the linear aspects of courtship tracking. For males tracking females whose speed was modulated at a mean of 1.2 Hz a phase lag of 148±30ms was determined for the translatory component and 21±55ms for the rotatory component of the male's response. A strain difference between wild type Kapelle and Canton-S strains in tracking efficiency permits the conclusion that courtship tracking ability may provide a basis for selective mating in Drosophila.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Averhoff, W.W., Richardson, R.M.: Multiple pheromone system controlling mating in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 73, 591–593 (1976)Google Scholar
  2. Bastock, M.: A gene mutation which changes a behaviour pattern. Evolution 10, 421–439 (1956)Google Scholar
  3. Bastock, M., Manning, A.: The courtship of Drosophila melanogaster. Behaviour 8, 85–111 (1955)Google Scholar
  4. Batschelet, E.: Statistical methods for the analysis of problems in animal orientation and certain biological rhythms. A.I.B.S. Monograph (1965)Google Scholar
  5. Benzer, S.: From the gene to behaviour. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 218, 1015–1022 (1971)Google Scholar
  6. Buchner, S., Reichardt, W.: Delay time between light stimulation and motor response in the fly (in preparation)Google Scholar
  7. Burnet, B., Connolly, K.: Activity and sexual behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. In the genetics of behaviour. Abeelen, J.M.F. van (ed.). Amsterdam: North Holland 1974Google Scholar
  8. Connolly, K., Burnet, B., Sewell, D.: Selective mating and eye pigmentation: an analysis of the visual component in the courtship behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 23, 548–559 (1969)Google Scholar
  9. Cook, R.M.: Courtship processing in Drosophila melanogaster. II. An adaptation to selection for receptivity to wingless males. Anim. Behav. 21, 349–358 (1973)Google Scholar
  10. Cook, R.: “Lesbian” phenotype of Drosophila melanogaster? Nature 254, 241–242 (1975)Google Scholar
  11. Cook, R.M.: Behavioral rôle of the sexcombs in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Behav. Genet. 7, 349–357 (1977)Google Scholar
  12. Cook, R.: The reproductive behaviour of gynandromorphic Drosophila melanogaster. Z. Naturforsch. 33c, 744–754 (1978)Google Scholar
  13. Cook, R.: Visual control in the courtship tracking Drosophila melanogaster (in preparation)Google Scholar
  14. Cook, R., Connolly, K.: Sexual behaviour of a female sterile mutant of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect. Physiol. 22, 1727–1735 (1976)Google Scholar
  15. Cook, R., Cook, A.: The attractiveness to males of female Drosophila melanogaster: effects of mating, age, and diet. Anim. Behav. 23, 521–526 (1975)Google Scholar
  16. Crossley, S., Zuill, E.: Courtship behaviour of some Drosophila melanogaster mutants. Nature 225, 1064–1065 (1970)Google Scholar
  17. Götz, K.G.: Optomotorische Untersuchung des visuellen Systems einiger Augenmutanten der Fruchtfliege Drosophila. Kybernetik 2, 77–92 (1964)Google Scholar
  18. Götz, K.G.: Hirnforschung am Navigationssystem der Fliegen. Naturwissenschaften 62, 468–475 (1975)Google Scholar
  19. Götz, K.G., Wenking, H.: Visual control of locomotion in the walking fruitfly Drosophila. J. Comp. Physiol. 85, 235–266 (1973)Google Scholar
  20. Hall, J.C.: Portions of the nervous system controlling reproductive behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Genet. 7, 291–312 (1977)Google Scholar
  21. Hall, J.C.: Control of male reproductive behaviour by the central nervous system of Drosophila: dissection of a courtship pathway by genetic mosaics. Genetics (in press)Google Scholar
  22. Heisenberg, M., Buchner, E.: The rôle of retinula cell types in visual behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Comp. Physiol. 117, 127–162 (1977)Google Scholar
  23. Hengstenberg, R.: The effect of pattern movement on the impulse activity of the cervical connective of Drosophila melanogaster. Z. Naturforsch. 28c, 503–596 (1973)Google Scholar
  24. Herget, C.M.: Reaction time of the common housefly (Musca domestica). Science 112, 62 (1950)Google Scholar
  25. Horn, E.: The mechanism of object fixation and its relation to spontaneous pattern preferences in Drosophila melanogaster. Biol. Cybernetics 31, 145–158 (1978)Google Scholar
  26. Horn, E., Wehner, R.: The mechanism of visual pattern fixation in the walking fly, Drosophila melanogaster. J. Comp. Physiol. 101, 39–56 (1975)Google Scholar
  27. Hotta, Y., Benzer, S.: Courtship in Drosophila mosaics: sex specific foci for sequential action patterns. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 73, 4154–4158 (1976)Google Scholar
  28. Land, M.F., Collet, T.S.: Chasing behaviour of houseflies (Fannia canicularis). J. Comp. Physiol. 89, 331–357 (1974)Google Scholar
  29. Manning, A.: The effects of artificial selection for mating speed in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 9, 82–92 (1961)Google Scholar
  30. Manning, A.: Selection for mating speed in Drosophila melanogaster based on the behaviour of one sex. Anim. Behav. II, 116–120 (1963)Google Scholar
  31. Nissani, M.: Gynandromorph analysis of some aspects of sexual behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 25, 555–566 (1977)Google Scholar
  32. Petit, C., Nouaud, D.: Ecological competition and the advantage of the rate type in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 29, 763–776 (1975)Google Scholar
  33. Reichardt, W.: Musterinduzierte Flugorientierung. Verhaltensversuche an der Fliege Musca domestica. Naturwissenschaften 60, 122–138 (1973)Google Scholar
  34. Reichardt, W., Poggio, T.: Visual control of orientation behaviour in the fly. Part 1. A quantitative analysis. Quant. Rev. Biophysics 9, 311–375 (1976)Google Scholar
  35. Schilcher, F. von: The rôle of auditory stimuli in the courtship of Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 24, 18–26 (1976a)Google Scholar
  36. Schilcher, F. von: The function of pulse song and sine song in the courtship of Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 24, 622–625 (1976b)Google Scholar
  37. Schilcher, F. von, Hall, J.C.: Neural topography of courtship song in sex mosaics of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 129, 85–95 (1979)Google Scholar
  38. Spieth, M.T.: Mating behaviour within the genus Drosophila (Diptera). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 99, 359–474 (1952)Google Scholar
  39. Srinivasan, M.V., Bernard, G.D.: The pursuit response of the housefly and its interaction with the optomotor response. J. Comp. Physiol. 115, 101–117 (1977)Google Scholar
  40. Tompkins, L., Hall, J.C., Hall, L.M.: Volatile compounds from normal and mutant Drosophila that stimulate courtship behaviour (submitted for publication)Google Scholar
  41. Virsik, R., Reichardt, W.: Tracking of moving objects by the fly Musca domestica. Naturwissenschaften 61, 132–133 (1974)Google Scholar
  42. Wehrhahn, C.: Sex-specific differences in the chasing behaviour of houseflies (Musca). Biol. Cybernetics 32, 239–241 (1979)Google Scholar
  43. Zimmermann, G.: Der Einfluß stehender und bewegter Musteranteile auf die optomotorische Reaktion der Fliege Drosophila. Dissertation Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen (1973)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Cook
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für biologische KybernetikTübingenFRG

Personalised recommendations