Roux's archives of developmental biology

, Volume 202, Issue 3, pp 170–175 | Cite as

Stability of positional identity of axolotl blastema cells in vitro

  • Anne Lesley Groell
  • David M. Gardiner
  • Susan V. Bryant
Original Articles

Summary

Previous grafting experiments have demonstrated that cells from non-contiguous positions within developing and regenerating limbs differ in a property referred to as positional identity. The goal of this study was to determine how long the positional identity of axolotl limb blastema cells is stable during culture in vitro. We have developed an assay for posterior positional properties such that blastema cells can be cultured and then grafted into anterior positions in host blastemas, to determine if they can stimulate supernumerary digit formation. We report that posterior blastema cells are able to maintain their positional identities for at least a week in culture. In addition, we observed that blastema cells are able to rapidly degrade collagenous substrates in vitro, a property that apparently distinguishes them from limb cells of other vertebrates. These results provide information regarding the time boundaries within which the positional properties of blastema cells can be studied and manipulated in vitro.

Key words

Axolotl Cell culture Regeneration Positional information 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bryant SV, Iten L (1974) The regulative ability of the limb regeneration blastema of Notophthalmus viridescens: Experiments in situ. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 174:90–101Google Scholar
  2. Bryant SV, Iten LE (1977) Intercalary and supernumerary regeneration in regenerating and mature limbs of Notophthalmus viridescens. J Exp Zool 202:1–16Google Scholar
  3. Bryant SV, French V, Bryant PJ (1981) Distal Regeneration and Symmetry. Science 212:993–1002Google Scholar
  4. Bryant SV, Gardiner DM, Muneoka K (1987) Limb development and regeneration. Am Zool 27:675–696Google Scholar
  5. Conn ME, Dearlove GE, Dresden MH (1979) Selection of a chemically defined medium for culturing adult newt forelimb regenerates. In Vitro 15:409–414Google Scholar
  6. Dollé P, Izpisua-Benmonte J-C, Falkenstein H, Renucci A, Duboule D (1989) Coordinate expression of the murine Hox-5 complex homoeobox-containing genes during limb pattern formation. Nature 342:767–772Google Scholar
  7. Dresden MH, Gross J (1970) The collagenolytic enzyme of the regenerating limb of the newt Triturus viridecens. Dev Biol 22:129–137Google Scholar
  8. Ferretti P, Brookes JP (1988) Culture of newt cells from different tissues and their expression of a regeneration-associated antigen. J Exp Zool 247:77–91Google Scholar
  9. Gardiner DM, Bryant SV (1989) Organization of positional information in the axolotl limb. J Exp Zool 251:47–55Google Scholar
  10. Gardiner DM, Gaudier C, Bryant SV (1992) Mouse limb bud cells respond to retinoic acid in vitro with reduced growth. J Exp Zool 263:406–413Google Scholar
  11. Gardiner DM, Muneoka K, Bryant SV (1986) The migration of dermal cells during blastema formation in axolotls. Dev Biol 118:488–493Google Scholar
  12. Grillo HC, Lapiere CM, Dresden MH, Gross J (1968) Collagenolytic activity in regenerating forelimbs of the adult newt (Triturus viridescens). Dev Biol 17:571–583Google Scholar
  13. Hayamizu TF, Bryant SV (1992) Retinoic acid respecifies limb bud cells in vitro. J Exp Zool: 263:423–429Google Scholar
  14. Hayamizu TF, Sessions SK, Wanck N, Bryant SV (1991) Effects of localized application of transforming growth factor β1 on developing chick limbs. Dev Biol 145:164–173Google Scholar
  15. Honig LS (1983) Polarizing activity of the avian limb examined on a cellular basis. In: Fallon JF, Caplan AI (eds) Limb development and regeneration. A R Liss, Inc, New York, pp 99–108Google Scholar
  16. Izpisúa-Belmonte J-C, Tickle C, Dollé P, Wolpert L, Duboule D (1991) Expression of the homebox Hox-4 genes and the specification of position in chick wing development. Nature 350: 585–589Google Scholar
  17. Jabaily JA, Blue P, Singer M (1982) The culturing of dissociated newt forelimb regenerate cells. J Exp Zool 219:67–73Google Scholar
  18. MacCabe AB, Gasseling MT, Saunders JW (1973) Spatiotemporal distribution of mechanisms that control outgrowth and anteroposterior polarization of the limb bud in the chick embryo. Mechanism Ageing Dev 2:1–12Google Scholar
  19. Muneoka K, Bryant SV (1984) Cellular contribution to supernumerary limbs in the axolotl, Ambystoma mexicanum. Dev Biol 105:166–178Google Scholar
  20. Muneoka K, Holler-Dinsmore G, Bryant SV (1986) Intrinsic control of regenerative loss in Xenopus laevis limbs. J Exp Zool 240:47–54Google Scholar
  21. Muneoka K, Holler-Dinsmore GV, Bryant SV (1985) A quantitative analysis of regeneration from chimaeric limb stumps in the axolotl. J Embryol Exp Morphol 90:1–12Google Scholar
  22. Nohno T, Noji S, Koyama E, Ohyama K, Myokai F, Kuroiwa A, Saito T, Taniguchi S (1991) Involvement of the Chox-4 chicken homeobox genes in determination of anteroposterior axial polarity during limb development. Cell 64:1197–1205Google Scholar
  23. Shi C, Muneoka K (1992) Position-specific growth of mouse limb bud cells in vitro. Dev Biol 151:9–17Google Scholar
  24. Tank PW, Carlson BM, Connelly TG (1976) A staging system for forelimb regeneration in the axolotl, Ambystoma mexicanum. J Morphol 150:117–128Google Scholar
  25. Tank PW, Connelly TG, Bookstein FL (1985) Cellular behavior in the anteroposterior axis of the regenerating forelimb of the axolotl, Ambystoma mexicanum. Dev Biol 109:215–223Google Scholar
  26. Tickle C (1981) The number of polarizing region cells required to specify additional digits in the developing chick wing. Nature 289:295–298Google Scholar
  27. Tickle C, Alberts B, Wolpert L, Lee J (1982) Local application of retinoic acid to the limb bond [sic] mimics the action of the polarizing region. Nature 296:564–566Google Scholar
  28. Tickle C, Summerbell D, Wolpert L (1975) Positional signalling and specification of digits in chick limb morphogenesis. Nature 254:199–202Google Scholar
  29. Yokouchi Y, Sasaki H, Kuroiwa A (1991) Homeobox gene expression correlated with the bifurcation process of limb cartilage development. Nature 353:443–445Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Lesley Groell
    • 1
  • David M. Gardiner
    • 1
  • Susan V. Bryant
    • 1
  1. 1.Developmental Biology Center and Department of Developmental and Cell BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaIrvine, IrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations