Biological Cybernetics

, Volume 56, Issue 4, pp 247–254 | Cite as

Facts on optic flow

  • J. J. Koenderink
  • Andrea J. van Doorn


We employ an optimal solution to both the “shape from motion problem” and the related problem of the estimation of self-movement on a purely optical basis to deduce practical rules of thumb for the limits of the optic flow information content in the presence of perturbation of the motion parallax field. The results are illustrated and verified by means of a computer simulation.

The results allow estimates of the accuracy of depth and egomotion estimates as a function of the accuracy of data sampling and the width of field of view, as well as estimates of the interaction between rotational and translational components of the movement.


Computer Simulation Information Content Related Problem Optic Flow Flow Information 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bruss AR, Horn BKP (1983) Passive navigation. Comput Vision Graph Image Process 21:3–20Google Scholar
  2. Gibson JJ (1950) The perception of the visual world. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MassGoogle Scholar
  3. Koenderink JJ, Doorn AJ van (1976) Local structure of movement parallax of the plane. J Opt Soc Am 66:717–723Google Scholar
  4. Koenderink JJ, Doorn AJ van (1981) Exterospecific component of the motion parallax field. J Opt Soc Am 71:953–957Google Scholar
  5. Koenderink JJ (1986) Optic flow. Vision Res 26:161–180Google Scholar
  6. Longuet-Higgins HC, Prazdny K (1980) The interpretation of moving retinal images. Proc R Soc London Ser B208:385–387Google Scholar
  7. Mach E (1962) Analysis of sensations (English translation 1962; originally published in 1886). Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Maybank SJ (1986) Algorithm for analyzing optical flow based on the least-squares method. Image Vision Comp 4:38–42Google Scholar
  9. Nakayama K (1985) Biological image motion processing: a review. Vision Res 25:625–660Google Scholar
  10. Ullman S (1979) The interpretation of structure from motion. Proc R Soc London Ser B 203:405–426Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. J. Koenderink
    • 1
  • Andrea J. van Doorn
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medical and Physiological Physics, Physics LaboratoryRUUUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations