Advertisement

Philosophical Studies

, Volume 82, Issue 2, pp 205–239 | Cite as

The structure of spatial localization

  • Roberto Casati
  • Achille C. Varzi
Article

Keywords

Spatial Localization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong, D. M., 1968, A Materialist Theory of the Mind, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  2. Brentano, F., 1976, Philosophische Untersuchungen zu Raum, Zeit und Kontinuum, hrsg. von S. Körner und R. M. Chisholm, Hamburg: Meiner (Eng. trans. by B. Smith, Philosophical Investigations on Space, Time and the Continuum, London: Croom Helm, 1988).Google Scholar
  3. Casati, R., and Varzi, A. C., 1994, Holes and Other Superficialities, Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press/Bradford Books.Google Scholar
  4. Chisholm, R. M., 1973, ‘Parts as Essential to their Wholes’, Review of Metaphysics 26, 581–603.Google Scholar
  5. Chisholm, R. M., 1992/93, ‘Spatial Continuity and the Theory of Part and Whole. A Brentano Study’, Brentano Studien 4, 11–23.Google Scholar
  6. Clarke, B. L., 1981, ‘A Calculus of Individuals Based on “Connection”’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 22, 204–18.Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, B. L., 1985, ‘Individuals and Points’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 26, 61–75.Google Scholar
  8. Davidson, D., 1969, ‘The Individuation of Events’, in N. Rescher (ed.), Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 216–34; reprinted in Davidson's Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980, pp. 163–80.Google Scholar
  9. Eschenbach, C., and Heydrich W., 1993, ‘Classical Mereology and Restricted Domains’, in N. Guarino and R. Poli (eds.), International Workshop on Formal Ontology in Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation, Padova: CNR-Ladseb, pp. 205–17.Google Scholar
  10. Hacker, P. M. S., 1982, ‘Events and Objects in Space and Time’, Mind 91, 1–19.Google Scholar
  11. Lemmon, E. J., 1967, ‘Comments on D. Davidson's “The Logical Form of Action Sentences”’, in N. Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action, Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, pp. 96–103.Google Scholar
  12. Leonard, H. S., and Goodman N., 1940, ‘The Calculus of Individuals and Its Uses’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 5, 45–55.Google Scholar
  13. Leśniewski, S., 1916, Podstawy ogólnej teoryi mnogości. I, Moskow: Prace Polskiego Kola Naukowego w Moskwie, Sekcya matematyczno-przyrodnicza (Eng. Trans. by D. I. Barnett, ‘Foundations of the General Theory of Sets. I’, in S. Leśniewski, Collected Works, ed. by S. J. Surma, J. Srzednicki, D. I. Barnett, F. V. Rickey, Dordrecht, Boston, and London: Nijhoff, 1992, Vol. 1, pp. 129–73).Google Scholar
  14. Lewis, D. K., 1991, Parts of Classes, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Lombard, L. B., 1986, Events. A Metaphysical Study, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  16. Quine, W. V. O., 1950, ‘Identity, Ostension and Hyposthasis’, Journal of Philosophy 47, 621–33.Google Scholar
  17. Quinton, A., 1979, ‘Objects and Events’, Mind 88, 197–214.Google Scholar
  18. Randell, D. A., and Cohn, A. G., 1989, ‘Modelling Topological and Metrical Properties in Physical Processes’ in R. J. Brachman, H. J. Levesque, and R. Reiter (eds.), Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Proceedings of the First International Conference, Los Altos: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 357–68.Google Scholar
  19. Randell, D. A., Cui, Z., and Cohn, A. G., 1992a, ‘An Interval Logic of Space Based on “Connection”’, in B. Neumann (ed.), Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 394–98.Google Scholar
  20. Randell, D. A., Cui, Z., and Cohn, A. G., 1992b, ‘A Spatial Logic Based on Regions and Connections’, in B. Nebel, C. Rich, and W. Swartout (eds.), Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference, Los Altos: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 165–76.Google Scholar
  21. Simons, P. M., 1987, Parts. A Study in Ontology, Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  22. Smith, B., 1993, ‘Ontology and the Logistic Analysis of Reality’, to appear in G. Häfliger and P. M. Simons (eds.), Analytic Phenomenology, Dordrecht, Boston, and London: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, B., 1995a, ‘Zur Kognition räumlicher Grenzen: Eine mereotopologische Untersuchung’, Kognitionswissenschaft 4/4, 177–84.Google Scholar
  24. Smith, B., 1995b, ‘Boundaries’, to appear in L. Hahn (ed.), Roderick Chisholm, La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
  25. Strawson, P., 1959, Individuals, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  26. Vandeloise, C., 1994, ‘Methodology and Analyses of the Preposition in’, Cognitive Linguistics 5, 157–84.Google Scholar
  27. Varzi, A. C., 1993, ‘Spatial Reasoning in a Holey World’, in P. Torasso (ed.), Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 326–36.Google Scholar
  28. Varzi, A. C., 1994, ‘On the Boundary Between Mereology and Topology’, in R. Casati, B. Smith, and G. White (eds.), Philosophy and the Cognitive Sciences. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, pp. 423–42.Google Scholar
  29. Varzi, A. C., 1996, ‘Boundaries, Continuity, and Contact’, Noûs, to appear.Google Scholar
  30. Whitehead, A. N., 1929, Process and Reality. An Essay in Cosmology, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Wiggins, D., 1968, ‘On Being in the Same Place at the Same Time’, Philosophical Review 77, 90–95.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Casati
    • 1
  • Achille C. Varzi
    • 2
  1. 1.CNRS, Seminaire d' Epistémologie ComparativeAix-en-ProvenceFrance
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations