Skip to main content
Log in

Some notes on trichotomous choice discrete valuation

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For some respondents, the bid offered by the dichotomous choice format used in the discrete choice technique can in fact be the true optimum. In this case the correct answer is neither ‘yes’ or ‘no’, but ‘indifferent’. We shall show results from a trichotomous choice format and analyse whether it produces welfare measures with narrower confidence intervals than the dichotomous technique. Another well known problem in contingent valuation (CV) studies is that the volume of the good to be purchased from hypothetical markets is not, in many cases, defined in precise terms. We show how the trichotomous choice technique can be used to test for possible vagueness in the volume of the project to be valued.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Greene, W. H. (1991), Econometric Analysis, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W. M. (1984), ‘Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66, 332–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W. M. (1989), ‘Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Response Data’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71, 1057–1061.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen, H., E. Mäntymaa, and R. Svento (1993), Testing the Inclusiveness Insensitivity Hypothesis in Public Goods Valuation, Department of Economics, University of Oulu, Discussion Papers in Economics and Business Studies No. 9.

  • Johansson, P.-O., B. Kriström, and K. G. Mäler (1989), ‘Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Response Data: Comment’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71, 1054–1056.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svento, R. (1993), ‘Concepts of Welfare Measurement under Uncertainty’, in R. Pethig, ed., Valuing the Environment: Methodological and Measurement Issues, Kluwer Academic Publishers (in press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Svento, R. Some notes on trichotomous choice discrete valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics 3, 533–543 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00364058

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00364058

Key words

Navigation