Biological Cybernetics

, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 35–49 | Cite as

A theory for the use of visual orientation information which exploits the columnar structure of striate cortex

  • M. A. Paradiso


A neural model is constructed based on the structure of a visual orientation hypercolumn in mammalian striate cortex. It is then assumed that the perceived orientation of visual contours is determined by the pattern of neuronal activity across orientation columns. Using statistical estimation theory, limits on the precision of orientation estimation and discrimination are calculated. These limits are functions of single unit response properties such as orientation tuning width, response amplitude and response variability, as well as the degree of organization in the neural network. It is shown that a network of modest size, consisting of broadly orientation selective units, can reliably discriminate orientation with a precision equivalent to human performance. Of the various network parameters, the discrimination threshold depends most critically on the number of cells in the hypercolumn. The form of the dependence on cell number correctly predicts the results of psychophysical studies of orientation discrimination. The model system's performance is also consistent with psychophysical data in two situations in which human performance is not optimal. First, interference with orientation discrimination occurs when multiple stimuli activate cells in the same hypercolumn. Second, systematic errors in the estimation of orientation can occur when a stimulus is composed of intersecting lines. The results demonstrate that it is possible to relate neural activity to visual performance by an examination of the pattern of activity across orientation columns. This provides support for the hypothesis that perceived orientation is determined by the distributed pattern of neural activity. The results also encourage the view of neural activity. The results also are determined by the responses of many neurons rather than the sensitivity of individual cells.


Neural Activity Discrimination Threshold Striate Cortex Visual Orientation Orientation Estimation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andrews DP, Butcher AK, Buckley BR (1973) Acuities for spatial arrangement in line figures: human and ideal observers compared. Vision Res 13:599–620Google Scholar
  2. Andriessen JJ, Bouma H (1976) Eccentric vision: adverse interactions between line segments. Vision Res 16:71–78Google Scholar
  3. Blake R, Holopigian K (1985) Orientation selectivity in cats and humans assessed by masking. Vision Res 25:1459–1467Google Scholar
  4. Blake R, Holopigian K, Jauch M (1985) Another visual illusion involving orientation. Vision Res 25:1469–1476Google Scholar
  5. Blakemore C, Campbell FW (1969) On the existence in the human visual system of neurons selectivity sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. J Physiol 203:237–260Google Scholar
  6. Blakemore C, Nachmias J (1971) The orientation selectivity of two visual after-effects. J Physiol 213:157–174Google Scholar
  7. Blakemore C, Tobin EA (1972) Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat's visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 15:439–440Google Scholar
  8. Blakemore C, Carpenter RHS, Georgeson MA (1970) Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the human visual system. Nature 228:37–39Google Scholar
  9. Bouma H, Andriessen JJ (1970) Induced changes in the perceived orientation of line segments. Vision Res 10:333–349Google Scholar
  10. Bradley A, Skottun BC, Ohzawa I, Sclar G, Freeman RD (1985) Neurophysiological evaluation of the differential response model for orientation and spatial-frequency discrimination. J Opt Soc Am A 2:1607–1610Google Scholar
  11. Burns BD, Prichard R (1971) Geometrical illusions and the response of neurons in the cat's visual cortex to angle patterns. J Physiol 213:599–616Google Scholar
  12. Campbell FW, Kulikowski JJ (1966) Orientational selectivity of the human visual system. J Physiol 187:437–445Google Scholar
  13. Carpenter RHS, Blakemore C (1973) Interactions between orientations in human vision. Exp Brain Res 18:287–303Google Scholar
  14. Cowey A, Rolls ET (1974) Human cortical magnification factor and its relation to visual acuity. Exp Brain Res 21:447–454Google Scholar
  15. Cramer H (1946) Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  16. Creutzfeldt OD, kuhnt U, Benevento LA (1974) An intracellular analysis of visual cortical neurons response to moving stimuli: response in a cooperative neuronal network. Exp Brain Res 21:251–274Google Scholar
  17. Daniel PM, Whitteridge D (1959) The representation of the visual field on the calcarine cortex in baboons and monkeys. J Physiol 148:33PGoogle Scholar
  18. Daniel PM, Whitteridge D (1961) The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys. J Physiol 159:203–221Google Scholar
  19. Daniels JD, Pettigrew JD (1975) A study of inhibitory antagonism in cat visual cortex. Brain Res 93:41–62Google Scholar
  20. Dean AF (1981) The variability of discharge of simple cells in the cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res 44:437–440Google Scholar
  21. De Valois RL, Yund EW, Hepler N (1982) The orientation and direction selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Res 22:531–544Google Scholar
  22. Dow BM, Snyder AZ, Vautin RG, Bauer R (1981) Magnification factor and receptive field size in foveal striate cortex of the monkey. Exp Brain Res 44:213–228Google Scholar
  23. Drasdo N (1977) The neural representation of visual space. Nature 266:554–556Google Scholar
  24. Ferster D (1986) Orientation selectivity of synaptic potentials in neurons of cat primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 6:1284–1301Google Scholar
  25. Fisher RA (1925) Theory of statistical estimation. Proc Cambridge Philos Soc 22:700Google Scholar
  26. Fries W, Albus K, Creutzfeldt OD (1977) Effects of interacting visual patterns on single cell responses in cats striate cortex. Vision Res 17:1001–1008Google Scholar
  27. Ganz L (1966) Mechanism of the figural aftereffects. Psychol Rev 73:128–150Google Scholar
  28. Heggelnd P, Albus K (1978) Response variability and orientation discrimination of single cells in striate cortex of cat. Exp Brain Res 32:197–211Google Scholar
  29. Henry GH, Dreher B, Bishop PO (1974) Orientation specificity of cells in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 37:1394–1409Google Scholar
  30. Hitchcock B, Hickey T (1980) Ocular dominance columns: evidence for their presence in humans. Brain Res 182:176–179Google Scholar
  31. Hotopf WHN, Ollerearnshaw C (1972) The regression to right angles tendency and the Poggendorf illusion. Br J Psychol 63:359–367Google Scholar
  32. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1962) Receptive fields, binocular interaction, and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol 160:106–154Google Scholar
  33. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1968) Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol 195:215–243Google Scholar
  34. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1974a) Sequence regularity and geometry of orientation columns in the monkey striate cortex. J Comp Neurol 158:267–293Google Scholar
  35. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1974b) Uniformity of monkey striate cortex: a parallel relationship between field size, scatter, and magnification factor. J Comp Neurol 158:295–305Google Scholar
  36. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN, Stryker MP (1978) Anatomical demonstration of orientation columns in macaque monkey. J Comp Neurol 177:361–380Google Scholar
  37. Kan PLE van, Scobey RP, Gabor AJ (1985) Response covariance in cat visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 60:559–563Google Scholar
  38. Kulikowski JJ, Abadi R, King-Smith PE (1973) Orientational selectivity of grating and line detectors in human vision. Vision Res 13:1479–1486Google Scholar
  39. LeVay S, Connolly M, Houde J, Van Essen DC (1985) The complete pattern of ocular dominance stripes in the striate cortex and visual field of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 5:486–501Google Scholar
  40. Levi DM, Klein SA, Aitsebaomo AP (1985) Vernier acuity, crowding, and cortical magnification. Vision Res 25:963–977Google Scholar
  41. Movshon JA, Blakemore C (1973) Orientation specificity and spatial selectivity in human vision. Perception 2:53–60Google Scholar
  42. Nelson JI, Frost BJ (1978) Orientation-selective inhibition from beyond the classical visual receptive field. Brain Res 139:359–365Google Scholar
  43. Nelson JI, Kato H, Bishop PO (1977) Discrimination of orientation and position disparities by binocularly activated neurons in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 40:260–283Google Scholar
  44. O'Kusky J, Colonnier M (1982) A laminar analysis of the number of neurons, glia, and synapses in the visual cortex (area 17) of adult macaque monkeys. J Comp Neurol 210:278–290Google Scholar
  45. Orban GA (1984) Neuronal operations in the visual cortex. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Paradiso MA, Carney T (1986) Orientation discrimination as a function of stimulus eccentricity and size: nasal/temporal retinal asymmetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 27:344Google Scholar
  47. Penfield W, Rasmussen T (1950) The cerebral cortex of man: a clinical study of localization of function. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Phillips GC, Wilson HR (1984) Orientation bandwidths of spatial mechanisms measured by masking. J Opt Soc Am A1:226–232Google Scholar
  49. Rose D (1979) An analysis of the variability of unit activity in the cat's visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 37:595–604Google Scholar
  50. Rose D, Blakemore C (1974) An analysis of orientation selectivity in the cat's visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 20:1–17Google Scholar
  51. Schiller PH, Finlay BL, Volman SF (1976a) Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. II. Orientation specificity and ocular dominance. J Neurophysiol 39:1320–1333Google Scholar
  52. Schiller PH, Finlay BL, Volman SF (1976b) Short-term response variability of monkey striate neurons. Brain Res 105:347–349Google Scholar
  53. Sillito AM (1975) The contribution of inhibitory mechanisms to the receptive field properties of neurons in the striate cortex of the cat. J Physiol 250:305–329Google Scholar
  54. Talbot SA, Marshall WH (1941) Physiological studies on neural mechanisms of visual localizations and discrimination. Am J Ophthalmol 24:1255–1263Google Scholar
  55. Thomas JP, Gille J (1979) Bandwidths of orientation channels in human vision. J Opt Soc Am 69:652–660Google Scholar
  56. Thomas JP, Shimamura KK (1975) Inhibitory interactions between visual pathways tuned to different orientations. Vision Res 15:1373–1380Google Scholar
  57. Tolhurst DJ, Thompson PG (1975) Orientation illusions and after-effects: inhibition between channels. Vision Res 15:967–972Google Scholar
  58. Tolhurst DJ, Movshon JA, Dean AF (1983) The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex. Vision Res 23:775–785Google Scholar
  59. Trees HL Van (1968) Detection, estimation, and modulation theory. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Vandenbussche E, Orban GA (1983) Meridional variations in the line orientation discrimination of the cat. Behav Brain Res 9:237–255Google Scholar
  61. Virsu V, Taskinen H (1975) Central inhibitory interactions in human vision. Exp Brain Res 23:65–74Google Scholar
  62. Wallace GK, Crampin DJ (1969) The effct of background density on the Zollner illusion. Vision Res 9:167–177Google Scholar
  63. Watkins DM, Berkley MA (1974) The orientation selectivity of single neurons in cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res 19:433–446Google Scholar
  64. Weintraub DJ, Virsu V (1972) Estimating the vertex of converging lines: angle misperception? Percept Psychophys 11:277–283Google Scholar
  65. Westheimer G, Shimamura K, McKee SP (1976) Interference with line-orientation sensitivity. J Opt Soc Am 66:332–338Google Scholar
  66. Wilson JR, Sherman SM (1976) Receptive-field characteristics of neurons in cat striate cortex: changes with visual field eccentricity. J Neurophysiol 39:512–533Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. Paradiso
    • 1
  1. 1.Neurobiology GroupUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations