Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 214–215 | Cite as

Decomposition of standing dead trees in the southern Appalachian Mountains

  • Mark E. Harmon
Article

Summary

Decomposition of standing dead trees that were killed by fire was examined for 10 species in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. The decrease in wood density as fire age increased was used to estimate decomposition rates. Quercus prinus had the fastest decay rate (11% yr-1) while Pinus virginiana had the slowest decay rate (3.6% yr-1) for standing dead wood. Decay rates were intermediate between those reported in western USA and tropics for wood.

Keywords

Decay Rate Decomposition Rate Wood Density Dead Wood Dead Tree 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barr AJ, Goodnight HH, Sall JP, Blair WH, Chilko DW (1979) SAS user's guide. 494 pp. Raleigh, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Cromack K (1973) Litter production and decompostion in a mixed hardwood and a white pine watershed at Coweeta Hydrological Station, North Carolina. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, GeorgiaGoogle Scholar
  3. Grier CC (1978) A Tsuga heterophylla-Picea sitchensis ecosystem of coastal Oregon: decomposition and nutrient balances of fallen logs. Can J For Res 8:198–206Google Scholar
  4. Lambert RL (1980) A biomass and nutrients analysis of fallen boles in terrace forests, Olympic National Park. In: Gouge J (ed) Proceedings of Second Confr. on Research in National Parks Vol. 7. National Park Service, Washington, DC, pp 80–95Google Scholar
  5. Lambert RL, Lang GE, Reiners WA (1980) Loss of mass and chemical change in decaying boles of a subalpine balsam fir forest. Ecology 61:1460–1473Google Scholar
  6. Lang GE, Knight DH (1979) Decay rates for the boles of tropical trees in Panama. Biotropica 11:316–317Google Scholar
  7. Olson JS (1963) Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44:322–331Google Scholar
  8. Shanks RE (1953) Climates of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecology 35:354–361Google Scholar
  9. Shanks RE, Olson JS (1961) First-year breakdown of leaf litter in southern Appalachian forests. Science 134:194–195Google Scholar
  10. Soil Survey Staff (1975) Soil Taxonomy, US Dept. Agric, Agric Handb 436, 754 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Stupka A (1964) Trees, shrubs and woody vines of Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Knoxville, TN: Univ. Tennessee Press, 186 pGoogle Scholar
  12. Swift MJ, Healy IN, Hibberd JK, Sykes JM, Bampoe V, Nesbitt ME (1976) The decomposition of branchwood in the canopy and floor of a mixed deciduous woodland. Oecologica 26:139–149Google Scholar
  13. US Forest Products Laboratory (1976) Wood handbook: Wood as an engineering material, 500 pp. US Dept. Agric, Agric Handb 72Google Scholar
  14. Whittaker RH (1956) Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecol Monogr 26:1–80Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark E. Harmon
    • 1
  1. 1.Great Smoky Mountains National Park, National Park Service, Department of the InteriorUplands Field Research LaboratoryGatlinburgUSA

Personalised recommendations