Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 201–227 | Cite as

Measurement of nest cavity volume by the honey bee (Apis mellifera)

  • Thomas Seeley


  1. 1.

    Honey bee swarms exercise considerable care when selecting a nest site. One nest site variable evaluated by bees is cavity volume.

  2. 2.

    The volume distribution of natural nests (Fig. 1) has a wide range (12 to 4431 observed), but most nest volumes are clustered in the 20- to 100-1 subrange. The modal volume is approximately 351. This distribution reflects a process of volume selection among potential nest cavities when a swarm chooses its nest site. For example, swarms prefer 40-1 to 10 and 100-1 nest cavities. In nature, the volume-selection process operates primarily by rejecting undersized cavities, but also by rejecting oversized cavities.

  3. 3.

    The observed limit in resolution power of volume perception was discrimination between cubes differing by 151.

  4. 4.

    A swarm's preference in nest cavity volume is independent of swarm size.

  5. 5.

    A scout bee's inspection of a nest site spans approximately 40 min. During this time a scout spends, most of her time at the nest site, engaged in numerous brief inspections inside and outside the nest cavity. When inside a cavity, a scout's principal behavior is rapid walking about the cavity's inner surfaces. The pattern of walking movements over successive interior inspections shows (1) a general progression from walking mostly near the entrance to walking deeper inside the cavity, and (2) a tendency to traverse different regions of the cavity's interior surface on different inspections.

  6. 6.

    Honey bees can measure cavity volume if at least one of two conditions is fulfilled: (1) the cavity interior is well illuminated, or (2) the cavity's inner surfaces can be completely traversed by walking. The natural conditions for volume perception are probably low (<0.5 lux) cavity illumination, but traversable inner surfaces. The importance of walking to volume perception was demonstrated by manipulating scout bees' perceptions of a cavity's volume by varying the amount of walking required to move between points inside the cavity. The hypothesis is presented that scouts measure the volumes of dimly illuminated cavities by integration information on the distances and directions of walking movements made inside the cavity.



Nest Site Cavity Volume Volume Selection Natural Nest Nest Cavity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Autrum, H., Seibt, U.: Die Dunkeladaptation des Bienenauges. Naturwissenschaften 52 566 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bisetzky, A.R.: Die Tänze der Bienen nach einem Fuβweg zum Futterplatz. Z. vergl. Physiol. 40, 264–288 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burgett, D.M., Morse, R.A.: The time of natural swarming in honey bees. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 67, 719–720 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Duelli, P.: Distanzdressuren von getragenen Ameisen (Cataglyphis bicolor Fabr., Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Rev. suisse Zool. 83, 413–418 (1976)Google Scholar
  5. Frisch, K. von. Gelöste und ungelöste Rätsel der Bienensprache. Naturwissenschaften 35, 12–23, 38–43, (1948)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frisch, K. von: The Dance Language and Orientation of Bees. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press 1967Google Scholar
  7. Heran, H., Lindauer, M.: Windkompensation und Seitenwindkorrektur der Bienen beim Flug über Wasser. Z. vergl. Physiol. 47 39–55 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lindauer, M.: Schwarmbienen auf Wohnungssuche. Z. vergl. Physiol. 37, 263–324 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lindauer, M.: Communication among Social Bees. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press 1961Google Scholar
  10. Lindauer, M.: Kompaßorientierung. Ergebn. Biol. 26 158–181 (1963)Google Scholar
  11. Lindauer, M., Nedel, J.O.: Ein Schweresinnesorgan der Honigbiene. Z. vergl. Physiol. 42, 334–364 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lindauer, M., Schricker, B.: Über die Funktion der Ocellen bei den Dämmerungsflügen der Honigbiene. Biol. Zbl. 82, 721–725 (1963)Google Scholar
  13. Mitchell, C.: Weights of workers and drones. Amer. Bee J. 110, 468–469 (1970)Google Scholar
  14. Schricker, B.: Die Orientierung der Honigbiene in der Dämmerung. Z. vergl. Physiol. 49, 420–458 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Seeley, T., Morse, R.A.: The nest of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Insectes Sociaux 23, 495–512 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Simpson, J.: The amounts of hive-space needed by colonies of European Apis mellifera. J. Apic. Res. 8, 3–8 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Simpson J.: The influence of hive-space restriction on the tendency of honeybee colonies to rear queens. J. Apic. Res. 12, 183–186 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Seeley
    • 1
  1. 1.Museum of Comparative Zoology LaboratoriesHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations