Marine Biology

, Volume 126, Issue 3, pp 383–393 | Cite as

Waterborne chemical compounds in tropical macroalgae: positive and negative cues for larval settlement

  • L. J. Walters
  • M. G. Hadfield
  • C. M. Smith
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Settlement sites of marine invertebrate larvae are frequently influenced by positive or negative cues, many of which are chemical in nature. Following from the observation that many shallow-water, Hawai'ian marine macroalgae are free of fouling by sessile invertebrates, we predicted that the algae are chemically protected and dependent on either surface-bound or continuously released soluble compounds to deter settling invertebrate larvae. To address the importance of waterborne algal compounds, we experimentally determined whether larvae of two of Hawai'i's dominant hard-surface fouling organisms, the polychaete tube worm Hydroides elegans and the bryozoan Bugula neritina, would settle in the presence of waters conditioned by 12 species of common Hawai'ian macroalgae (representing the Phaeophyta, Chlorophyta, Rhodophyta and Cyanophyta). The results included a full spectrum of biological responses by each larval species to waterborne algal compounds. Larval responses to conditioned water were consistent for each algal species, but the outcomes were not predictable based on the taxonomic relationships of the algae. For example, among the species of Phaeophyta examined, different conditioned waters were: (1) toxic, (2) inhibited settlement, (3) simulated settlement, or (4) had no effect, compared to larvae in control dishes containing filtered seawater. Additionally, larval responses to aged (24 h) conditioned waters could not be predicted from the results of assays run with conditioned waters utilized immediately after preparation. Finally, settlement by larvae of one species did not predict outcomes of tests for the other species. Four of 12 shallow-reef Hawai'ian macroalgae tested released compounds into surrounding waters that immediately killed or inhibited settlement by both H. elegans and B. neritina (toxic: Dictyota sandvicensis; inhibitory: Halimeda discoidea, Sphacelaria tribuloides, Ulva reticulata); the remaining 8 algal species prevented settlement by one of these fouling organisms but for the other had no effect or, in some cases, even stimulated settlement

Keywords

Macroalgae Polychaete Ulva Halimeda Fouling Organism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Almodovar LR (1964) Ecological aspects of some antibiotic algae in Puerto Rico. Botanica mar 6: 143–146Google Scholar
  2. Al-Ogily SM, Knight-Jones EW (1977) Anti-fouling role of antibiotics produced by marine algae and bryozoans. Nature, Lond 265: 728–729Google Scholar
  3. Bahamondes-Rojas I, Dherbomez M (1990) Purification partielle des substances glycoconjugees capables d'induire la metamorphose des larves competentes d'Eubranchus doriae (Trinchese, 1879) mollusque nudibranche. J exp mar Biol Ecol 144: 17–27Google Scholar
  4. Beach K, Smith CM, Michael T, Shin HW (1995) Photosynthesis in repoductive unicells of Ulva fasciata and Enteromorpha flexuosa: implications for ecological success. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 125: 229–237Google Scholar
  5. Bernstein BB, Jung N (1979) Selective pressures and coevolution in a kelp canopy community in Southern California. Ecol Monogr 49: 335–355Google Scholar
  6. Caccamese S, Azzolina R, Furnari G, Cormaci M, Grasso S (1980) Antimicrobial and antiviral activities of extracts from Mediterranean algae. Botanica mar 23: 285–288Google Scholar
  7. Crisp DJ (1967) Chemical factors inducing settlement in Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin). J Anim Ecol 36: 329–335Google Scholar
  8. Crisp DJ (1974) Factors inflencing the settlement of marine invertebrate larvae. In: Grant PT, Mackie AT (eds) Chemoreception in marine organisms. Academic Press, New York, pp 177–265Google Scholar
  9. Crisp DJ (1976) Settlement responses in marine organisms. In: Newell RC (ed) Adaptation to environments: essays on the physiology of marine animals. Butterworths, London, pp 83–124Google Scholar
  10. Crisp DJ (1984) Overview of research on marine invertebrate larvae, 1940–1980. In: Costlow JD, Tipper RC (eds) Marine biodeterioration: an interdisciplinary study. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, Md, pp 103–126Google Scholar
  11. Crisp DJ, Meadows PS (1962) The chemical basis of gregariousness in cirripedes. Proc R Soc (Ser B) 156: 500–520Google Scholar
  12. Crisp DJ, Meadows PS (1963) Adsorbed layers: the stimulus for settlement in barnacles. Proc R Soc (Ser B) 158: 364–387Google Scholar
  13. Crisp DJ, Williams GB (1960) Effect of extracts from fucoids in promoting settlement of epiphytic Polyzoa. Nature, Lond 188: 1206–1207Google Scholar
  14. Davis AR, Targett NM, McConnell OJ, Young CM (1989) Epibiosis of marine algae and benthic invertebrates: natural products chemistry and other mechanisms inhibiting settlement and overgrowth. In: Scheuer PJ (ed) Bioorganic marine chemistry. Vol. 3. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 85–114Google Scholar
  15. Davis AR, Wright AE (1990) Inhibition of larval settlement by natural products from the ascidian, Eudistoma olivaceum (Van Name). J chem Ecol 16: 1349–1357Google Scholar
  16. Dawson EY (1966) Marine botany, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. De Nys R Steinberg PD, Willemsen P, Dworjanyn SA, Gabelish CL, King RJ (1995) Broad spectrum effects of secondary metabolites from the red alga Delisea pulchra in antifouling assays. Biofouling 8: 259–271Google Scholar
  18. Dixon J, Schroeter SC, Kastendiek J (1981) Effects of the encrusting bryozoan Membranipora membranacea on the loss of blades and fronds by the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera (Laminariales). J Phycol 17: 341–345Google Scholar
  19. Faulkner DJ (1984) Marine natural products: metabolites of marine algae and herbivorous marine molluscs. Nat Product Rep 1: 251–280Google Scholar
  20. Grosberg RK (1981) Competitive ability influences havitat choice in marine invertebrates. Nature, Lond 290: 700–702Google Scholar
  21. Gschwend PM, MacFarlane JK, Newman KA (1985) Volatile halogenated organic compunds released to seawater from temperate marine macroalgae. Science, NY 227: 1033–1035Google Scholar
  22. Hadfield MG (1977) Chemical interactions in larval settling of a marine gastroped. In: Faulkner DJ, Fenical WH (eds) Marine natural products chemistry. Plenum Press, New York, pp 403–413Google Scholar
  23. Hadfield MG (1978) Metamorphosis in marine molluscan larvae: an analysis of stimulus and response. In: Chia FS, Rice ME (eds) Settlement and metamorphosis of marine invertebrate larvae. Elsevier, New York, pp 165–175Google Scholar
  24. Hadfield MG, Scheuer D (1985) Evidence for a soluble metamorphic inducer in Phestilla: ecological, chemical and biological data. Bull mar Sci 37: 556–566Google Scholar
  25. Hadfield MG, Unabia CC, Smith CM, Michael TM (1994) Settlement preferences of the ubiquitous fouler Hydroides elegans. In: Thompson MF, Nagabhushanam R, Sarojini R, Fingerman M (eds) Recent developments in biofouling control. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. New Delhi, pp 67–74Google Scholar
  26. Hay ME, Fenical W (1988) Marine plant-herbivore interactions: the ecology of chemical defense. A Rev Ecol Syst 19: 111–145Google Scholar
  27. Highsmith RC (1982) Induced settlement and metamorphosis of sand dollar (Dendraster excentricus) larvae in predator-free sites: adult sand dollar beds. Ecology 63: 329–337Google Scholar
  28. Hodgson LM (1984) Antimicrobial and antineoplastic activity in some south Florida seaweeds. Botanica mar 27: 387–390Google Scholar
  29. Holmström C, Kjelleberg S (1994) The effect of external biological factors on settlement of marine invertebrate and new antifouling technology. Biofouling 8: 147–160Google Scholar
  30. Holmström C, Rittschof D, Kjelleberg S (1992) Inhibition of settlement by larvae of Balamus amphitrite and Ciona intestinalis by a surface-colonizing marine bacterium. Appl envirl Microbiol 58: 2111–2115Google Scholar
  31. Jensen R, Morse DE (1990) Chemically induced metamorphosis of polychaete larvae in both the laboratory and ocean environment. J Chem Ecol 16: 911–930Google Scholar
  32. Johnson CR, Muir DG, Reysenbach AL (1991a) Characteristic bacteria associated with surfaces of coralline algae: a hypothesis for bacterial induction of marine invertebrate larvae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 74: 281–294Google Scholar
  33. Johnson CR, Sutton DC, Olson RR, Giddens R (1991b) Settlement of crown-of-thorns starfish: role of bacteria on surfaces of coralline algae and a hypothesis for deep water recruitment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 71: 143–162Google Scholar
  34. Johnson LE, Strathmann RR (1989) Settling barnacle larvae avoid substrata previously occupied by a mobile predator. J exp mar Biol Ecol 128: 87–103Google Scholar
  35. Keough MJ, Raimondi PT (1995) Responses of settling invertebrate larvae to bioorganic films: effects of different types of films. J exp mar Biol Ecol 185: 235–253Google Scholar
  36. Kirchman D, Graham S, Reish D, Mitchell R (1982) Bacteria induce settlement and metamorphosis of Janua (Dexiospira) brasiliensis Grube (Polychaeta: Spirobidae). J exp mar Biol Ecol 56: 153–163Google Scholar
  37. Knight-Jones EW, Crisp DJ (1953) Gregariousness in barnacles in relation to the fouling of ships and to anti-fouling research. Nature, Lond 171: p. 1109Google Scholar
  38. Lee RE (1989) Phycology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  39. Littler DS, Littler MM, Bucher KE, Norris JN (1989) Marine plants of the Caribbean. A field guide from Florida to Brazil. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  40. Littler MM, Littler DS, Taylor PR (1987) Animal-plant defense associations: effects on the distribution and abundance of tropical reef macrophytes. J exp mar Biol Ecol 105: 107–121Google Scholar
  41. Lynch WF (1947) The behavior and metamorphosis of the larvae of Bugula neritina (Linnaeus): experimental modification of the length of the free-swimming period and the responses to light and gravity. Biol Bull mar biol Lab, Woods Hole 92: 115–150Google Scholar
  42. Magruder WH, Hunt JW (1979) Seaweeds of Hawaii. The Oriental Publishing Co. Honolulu, HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  43. Maki JS, Rittschol D, Costlow JD, Mitchell R (1988) Inhibition of attachment of larval barnacles, Balanus amphitrite, by bacterial films. Mar Biol 97: 199–206Google Scholar
  44. Maki JS, Rittschof D, Schmidt AR, Snyder AG, Mitchell R (1989) Factors controlling attachment of bryozoan larvae: a comparison of bacterial films and unfilmed surfaces. Biol Bull mar biol Lab, Woods Hole 177: 295–302Google Scholar
  45. McGee BL, Targett NM (1989) Larval habitat selection in Crepidula (L.) and its effect on adult distribution patterns. J exp mar Biol Ecol 131: 195–214Google Scholar
  46. McLachlan J, Craige JS (1966) Antialgal activity of some simple phenols. J Phycol 2: 133–135Google Scholar
  47. Mihm JW, Banata WC, Loeb GI (1981) Effects of absorbed organic and primary fouling films on bryozoan settlement. J exp mar Biol Ecol 54: 167–179Google Scholar
  48. Mitchell R, Kirchman D (1984) The microbial ecology of marine surfaces. In: Costlow JD, Tipper RC (eds) Marine biodeterioration: an interdisciplinary study. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, pp 49–56Google Scholar
  49. Morse ANC, Morse DE (1984) Recruitment and metamorphosis of Haliotis larvae induced by molecules uniquely available at the surfaces of crustose red algae. J exp mar Biol Ecol 75:191–215Google Scholar
  50. Morse DE, Tegner M, Duncan H, Hooker N, Trevelyan G, Cameron A (1980) Induction of settling and metamorphosis of planktonic molluscan (Haliotis) larvae. III. Signaling by metabolites of intact algae is dependem on contact. In: Muller-Schwarze D, Silverstein RM (eds) Chemical signals. Plenum Press, New York, pp 67–86Google Scholar
  51. Oswald RC, Telford N, Seed R, Happy-Wood CM (1984) The effect of encrusting bryozoans on the photosynthetic activity of Fucus serratus L. Estuar, estl Shelf Sci 19: 697–702Google Scholar
  52. Paul VJ (1992) Seawood chemical defenses on coral reefs. In: Paul VJ (ed) Ecological roles of marine natural products. Comstock Publishing Associates. Ithaca, NY, pp 24–50Google Scholar
  53. Paul VJ, Hay ME (1986) Seaweed susceptibility to herbivory: chemical and morphological correlates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 33: 255–264Google Scholar
  54. Paul VJ, Van Alstyne KL (1988) Chemical defense and chemical variation in some tropical Pacific species of Halimeda (Halimedaccae: Chlorophyta). Coral Reefs 6: 263–269Google Scholar
  55. Pawlik JR (1992) Chemical ecology of the settlment of benthic marine invertebrates. Oceanogr mar Biol A Rev 30: 273–335Google Scholar
  56. Pechenik JA, Cerulli TR (1991) Influence of delayed metamorphosis on survival, growth, and reproduction of the marine polychaete Capitella sp. I. J exp mar Biol Ecol 51: 17–27Google Scholar
  57. Pennington JT, Hadfield MG (1989) Larvae of a nudibranch mollusc (Phestilla sibogae) metamorphose when exposed to common organic solvents. Biol Bull mar biol Lab Woods Hole 177: 350–355Google Scholar
  58. Renaud P, Hay ME, Schmitt TM (1990) Interactions of plant stress and herbivory: intraspecific variation in the susceptibility of a palatable versus and unpalatable seaweed to sea urchin grazing. Oecologia 82: 217–226Google Scholar
  59. Rice ME (1986) Factors influencing larval metamorphosis in Golfingia misakiana (Sipuncula) Bull mar Sci 39: 362–375Google Scholar
  60. Rittschof D, Hooper IR, Costlow JD (1988) Settlement inhibition of marine invertebrate larvae: comparison of sensitivities of bryozoan and barnacle larvae. In: Thompson MF, Sarojini R, Nagabhushanam R (eds) Marine biodeterioration. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. New Delhi, pp 509–608Google Scholar
  61. Roberts D, Rittschof D, Holm E, Schmidt AR (1991) Factors influencing initial larval settlement: temporal, spatial and surface molecular components. J exp mar Biol Ecol 150: 203–222Google Scholar
  62. SAS Institute, Inc. (1988) SAS user's guide: statistics. 6.03 edn. SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  63. Scheltema RS (1961) Metamorphosis of the veliger larvae of Nassarius obsoletus (Gastropoda) in response to bottom sediment. Biol Bull mar biol Lab, Woods Hole 120: 92–109Google Scholar
  64. Scheltema RS (1974) Biological interactions determining larval settlement of marine invertebrates. Thalassia jugosl 10: 263–296Google Scholar
  65. Schmitt TM, Hay ME, Lindquist N (1995) Constraints on chemically mediated coevolution: multiple functions for seaweed secondary metabolites. Ecology 76: 107–123Google Scholar
  66. Sieburth JM, Conover JT (1965) Sargassum tannin, an antibiotic which retards fouling. Nature, Lond 208: 52–53Google Scholar
  67. Szewzyk U, Holmström C, Wrangstadh M, Samuelson MO, Maki JS, Kjelleberg S (1991) Relevance of the exopolysaccharide of marine Pseudomonas sp. strain S9 for the attachment of Ciona larvae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 75: 259–265Google Scholar
  68. Tamburri MN, Zimmer-Faust RK, Tamplin ML (1992) Natural sources and properties of chemcial inducers mediating settlement of oyster larvae: a re-examination. Biol Bull mar biol Lab, Woods Hole 183: 327–338Google Scholar
  69. Todd JS, Zimmerman RC, Crews P, Alberte RS (1993) The antifouling activity of natural and synthetic phenolic acid sulfate esters. Phytochem 34: 401–404Google Scholar
  70. Williams GB (1964) The effect of extracts of Fucus serratus in promoting the settlement of larvae of Spirorbis borealis (Polychaeta). J mar biol Ass UK 44: 397–414Google Scholar
  71. Woodin SA (1991) Recruitment of infauna: positive or negative cues? Am Zool 31: 797–807Google Scholar
  72. Woodin SA, Marinelli RL (1991) Biogenic habitat modification in marine sediments: the importance of speicies composition and activity. In: Meadows PS, Tufail A (eds) The environmental impact of burrowing animals and animal burrows. Zoological Society, London, pp 231–250 (Symp zool Soc Lond No. 63)Google Scholar
  73. Woodin SA, Marinelli RL, Lincoln DE (1993) Allelochemical inhibition of recruitment in a sedimentary assemblage. J chem Ecol 19: 517–530Google Scholar
  74. Woollacott RM (1984) Environmental factors in bryozoan settlement. In: Costlow JD, Tipper RC (eds) Marine biodeterioration: an interdisciplinary study. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, pp 149–154Google Scholar
  75. Woollacott RM, North WJ (1971) Bryozoans of California and North Mexico kelp beds. Beih Nova Hedwigia 32: 455–479Google Scholar
  76. Young CM, Chia FS (1981) Laboratory evidence for delay of larval settlment in response to a dominant competitor. Int J Invert Reprod 3: 221–226Google Scholar
  77. ZoBell CE, Allen EC (1935) The significance of marine bacteria in the fouling of submerged surfaces. J Bact 29: 239–251Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. J. Walters
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. G. Hadfield
    • 1
  • C. M. Smith
    • 2
  1. 1.Kewalo Marine LaboratoryUniversity of Hawai'iHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.Department of BotanyUniversity of Hawai'iHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations