Marine Biology

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 144–162 | Cite as

Sponge burrowing: Fine structure of Cliona lampa penetrating calcareous substrata

  • K. Rützler
  • G. Rieger
Article

Abstract

Cliona lampa Laubenfels (Porifera: Hadromerida), a common burrowing organism in Bermuda, has been used to study the method of sponge penetration into calcareous objects. To progress beyond the results obtained by previous authors, electron-microscope techniques, in addition to light-microscope observations, were employed. Burrowing patterns, fine structure of the tissue-substratum interface and of calcareous fragments removed by sponge activity are described on the basis of scanning electron microscopy. Cell types and cytological features have been identified by light and transmission electron microscope. One cell type of archeocyte origin is demonstrated; it carves out chips of calcium carbonate (and conchiolin) by means of filopodial extensions and etching secretions. The cells undergo plasmolysis during this process; the substratum chips are expelled through the exhalent canal system. It is calculated that only 2 to 3% of the eroded material is removed in solution.

Keywords

Calcareous Scanning Electron Microscopy Transmission Electron Microscope Sponge Fine Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Bagby, R. M.: The fine structure of pinacocytes in the marine sponge Microciona prolifera (Ellis and Solander). Z. Zellforsch. Abt. Histochem. 105, 579–594 (1970).Google Scholar
  2. Borejevic, R. et C. Lévi: Etude au microscope électronique des cellules de l'éponge: Ophlitaspongia seriata (Grant), au cours de la réorganisation après dissociation. Z. Zellforsch. Abt Histochem. 64, 708–725 (1964).Google Scholar
  3. Carriker, M. R. and E. H. Smith: Comparative calcibiocavitology: summary and conclusions. Am. Zool. 9, 1011–1020 (1969).Google Scholar
  4. Carriker, M. R. and E. H. Smith and R. T. Wilce (Eds.): Penetration of calcium carbonate substrates by lower plants and invertebrates. Am. Zool. 9, 629–1020 (1969).Google Scholar
  5. Clapp, W. F. and R. Kenk: Marine borers, an annotated bibliography, 1136 pp. Washington, D.C.: Office of Naval Research, Department of the Navy 1963.Google Scholar
  6. Cobb, W. R.: Penetration of calcium carbonate substrates by the boring sponge, Cliona. Am. Zool. 9, 783–790 (1969).Google Scholar
  7. Cotte, J.: Note sur le mode de perforation des cliones. C.r. Séanc. Soc. Biol. 54, 636–637 (1902).Google Scholar
  8. Fawcett, D. W.: The cell, its organelles and inclusions. An atlas of fine structure, 448 pp. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co. 1966.Google Scholar
  9. Goreau, T. F. and W. D. Hartman: Boring sponges as controlling factors in the formation and maintenance of coral reefs. In: Mechanisms of hard tissue destruction, Ed. by R. F. Sognnaes. Washington, D.C.: Publs Am. Ass. Advmt Sci. 75, 25–54 (1963).Google Scholar
  10. Grant, R. E.: Notice of a new zoophyte (Cliona celata Gr.) from the Firth of Forth. Edinb. New Phil. J. 1, 78–81 (1826).Google Scholar
  11. Hartmann, W. D.: Natural history of the marine sponges of southern New England. Bull. Peabody Mus. nat. Hist. 12, 1–155 (1958).Google Scholar
  12. Laubenfels, M. W. de: The Porifera of the Bermuda Archipelago. Trans. zool. Soc. Lond. 27, 1–154 (1950).Google Scholar
  13. —: Sponges from the Gulf of Mexico. Bull. mar. Sci. Gulf Caribb. 2, 511–557 (1953).Google Scholar
  14. Lévi, C.: Ultrastructure de la larve parenchymella de démosponge. 1. Mycale contarenii (Martens). Cah. Biol. mar. 5, 97–104 (1964).Google Scholar
  15. Little, F. J., Jr.: The sponge fauna of the St. George's Sound, Apalachee Bay and Panama City regions of the Florida Gulf Coast. Tulane Stud. Zool. 11, 31–71 (1963).Google Scholar
  16. Nassonov, N.: Zur Biologie und Anatomie der Clione. Z. wiss. Zool. 39, 295–208 (1883).Google Scholar
  17. Neumann, A. C.: Observations on coastal erosion in Bermuda and measurements of the boring rate of the sponge, Cliona lampa. Limnol. Oceanogr. 11, 92–108 (1966).Google Scholar
  18. Pang, R. K.: The systematics of some Jamaican excavating sponges. Postilla (In press).Google Scholar
  19. Pavans de Ceccatty, M.: Ultrastructures et rapports des cellules mésenchymateuses de type nerveux de l'eponge Tethya lyncurium Lmk. Annls Sci. nat. (Zool. Biol. Animale) (sér. 12) 8, 577–614 (1966).Google Scholar
  20. — et Y. Thiney: Microscopie électronique de la fibrogenèse cellulaire du collagène, chez l'éponge siliceuse Tethya lyncurium Lmk. C.r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 256, 5406–5408 (1963).Google Scholar
  21. Rützler, K.: Bredin-Archbold-Smithsonian biological survey of Dominica: Burrowing sponges, genus Siphonodictyon Bergquist, from the Caribbean. Smithson. Contr. Zool. 77, 1–37 (1971).Google Scholar
  22. Rützler, K.: The burrowing sponges of Bermuda. Smithson. Contr. Zool. (In press).Google Scholar
  23. Rützler, K.: Participation of burrowing sponges in erosion and sediment production on the Bermuda platform. (In preparation).Google Scholar
  24. Topsent, E.: Contribution à l'étude des clionides. Archs Zool. exp. gén. (sér. 2) 5, 1–165 (1887).Google Scholar
  25. —: Etude monographique des spongiaries de France. III. Monaxonida (Hadromerina). Archs Zool. exp. gén. (sér. 3) 8, 1–331 (1900).Google Scholar
  26. Vosmaer, G. C. J.: The sponges of the Bay of Naples. Porifera Incalaaria. With analyses of genera and studies in the variations of species, Part V. pp 321–456. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff 1933.Google Scholar
  27. Warburton, F. E.: The manner in which the sponge Cliona bores in calcareous objects. Can. J. Zool. 36, 555–562 (1958).Google Scholar
  28. Wilson, H. V. and J. T. Penney: The regeneration of sponges (Microciona) from dissociated cells. J. exp. Zool. 56, 73–147 (1930).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Rützler
    • 1
  • G. Rieger
    • 2
  1. 1.National Museum of Natural HistorySmithsonian InstitutionWashington, D.C.USA
  2. 2.Lehrkanzel für MeersbiologieUniversität WienWienAustria

Personalised recommendations