Philosophical Studies

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 187–211

The ins and outs of perception

  • David Woodruff Smith
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Bach, Kent: 1982, ‘De re belief and methodological solipsism’, in Woodfield (ed.), pp. 121–51.Google Scholar
  2. Blinder, David: 1986, ‘A new look at vision’, Topoi (to appear in 1986).Google Scholar
  3. Burge, Tyler: 1977, ‘Belief de re’, Journal of Philosophy, 74, pp. 338–62.Google Scholar
  4. Burge, Tyler: 1979, ‘Individualism and the mental’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4, pp. 73–121.Google Scholar
  5. Burge, Tyler: 1982, ‘Other bodies’, in Woodfield (ed.), pp. 97–120.Google Scholar
  6. Castañeda, Hector-Neri: 1977, ‘Perception, belief, and the structure of physical objects and consciousness’, Synthese 35, 285–351.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, Romane: 1973, ‘Sensuous judgments’, Noûs 7, 45–56.Google Scholar
  8. Dreyfus, Hubert, (ed.): 1982, Husserl, Intentionality, and Cognitive Science (MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, 1982).Google Scholar
  9. Dreyfus, Hubert: 1982a, in Dreyfus (ed.) (1982).Google Scholar
  10. Fodor, Jerry: 1982, ‘Methodological solipsism as a research strategy in cognitive psychology’, in Dreyfus (ed.) (1982).Google Scholar
  11. Gibson, J. J.: 1979, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, 1979).Google Scholar
  12. Heidegger, Martin: 1927, Being and Time (translated by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson; Harper & Row, New York, 1962; German original, 1927).Google Scholar
  13. Husserl, Edmund: 1913, Ideas (translated by W. R. Boyce Gibson; Collier Books, New York, 1962; German original, 1913).Google Scholar
  14. McIntrye, Ronald: 1985, ‘Searle on intentionality’, Inquiry (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  15. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice: 1945, Phenomenology of Perception (translated by Colin Smith; Routledge & Kegan Paul, New York, 1962; French original, 1945).Google Scholar
  16. Miller, Izchak: 1984, ‘Perceptual reference’, Synthese 61, pp. 35–60.Google Scholar
  17. Mulligan, Kevin, and Barry Smith: 1986, ‘A relational theory of the act’, Topoi (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  18. Peacocke, Christopher: 1981, ‘Demonstrative thought and psychological explanation’, Synthese 49, pp. 187–217.Google Scholar
  19. Perry, John: 1979, ‘The problem of the essential indexical’, Nous 13, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
  20. Putnam, Hilary: 1975, ‘The meaning of “meaning”’, in his Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Volume 2 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1975), pp. 215–71.Google Scholar
  21. Putnam, Hilary: 1981, Reason, Truth and History (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1981).Google Scholar
  22. Quine, W. V.: 1956, ‘Quantifiers and propositional attitudes’, in Leonard Linsky (ed.), Reference and Modality (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1971).Google Scholar
  23. Simons, Peter: 1983, ‘Contents and objects’, in P. Weingartner and H. Czernak (eds.), Epistemology and Philosophy of Science (Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna), pp. 81–84.Google Scholar
  24. Smith, Barry: 1984, ‘Acta cum fundamentis in re’, Dialectica 38, pp. 157–78.Google Scholar
  25. Smith, David Woodruff: 1979, ‘The case of the exploding perception’, Synthese 41, pp. 239–69.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, David Woodruff: 1981, ‘Indexical sense and reference’, Synthese 49, pp. 101–27.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, David Woodruff: 1982a, ‘The realism in perception’, Nous 16, pp. 42–55.Google Scholar
  28. Smith, David Woodruff: 1982b, ‘Husserl on demonstrative reference and perception’, in Dreyfus (ed.) (1982).Google Scholar
  29. Smith, David Woodruff: 1983a, ‘Is this a dagger I see before me?’, Synthese 54, pp. 95–114.Google Scholar
  30. Smith, David Woodruff: 1983b, ‘Husserl's philosophy of mind’, in Guttorm Fløistad (ed.), Contemporary philosophy. A new survey. Volume 4, pp. 249–86.Google Scholar
  31. Smith, David Woodruff: 1984, ‘Content and context of perception’, Synthese 61, pp. 61–87.Google Scholar
  32. Smith, David Woodruff, and Ronald McIntyre: 1982, Husserl and Intentionality: A Study of Mind, Meaning, and Language (D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht and Boston).Google Scholar
  33. Sosa, Ernest: 1983, ‘Propositions and indexical attitudes’, in Herman Parret, ed., On Believing/De la croyance (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin and New York).Google Scholar
  34. Woodfield, Andrew, (ed.): 1982, Thought and Object: Essays on Intentionality (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Woodruff Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of California, IrvineIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations