Marine Biology

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 161–171 | Cite as

Distribution of the cladoceran Podon polyphemoides in the Chesapeake Bay

  • H. F. Bosch
  • W. Rowland Taylor


The distribution of the cladoceran Podon polyphemoides (Leuckart) in the Chesapeake Bay (USA) estuarine system was determined by a quantitative pump sampling method, and the patterns of abundance were correlated with temperature and salinity distributions. The species was seasonally recurrent, with distinct population maxima in the central portion of the bay. Population densities in excess of 60,000 podonids/m3 have been recorded. The podonids first appeared in the spring in the shallow tributaries, when water temperatures near the bottom reached 6°C. The vernal populations disappeared when summer temperatures exceeded 27°C, but reappeared in the fall as the water cooled. The species was euryhaline and eurythermal in its distribution, but the greatest concentrations were attained within relatively narrow zones of temperatures between 11o and 26°C, and salinities between 8 and 18‰. The production of males, sexual females and sexual eggs occurred both in the spring and the fall between the thermal limits of 11o and 17°C.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Ackefors, H.: Seasonal and vertical distribution of the zooplankton in the Asko area (Northern Baltic proper) in relation to hydrographical conditions. Oikos 20, 480–492 (1969).Google Scholar
  2. —: Podon polyphemoides Leuckart and Bosmina coregoni maritima (P. E. Muller) in relation to temperature and salinity in field studies and laboratory experiments. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 7, 51–70 (1971).Google Scholar
  3. Bainbridge, V.: Some observations on Evadne nordmanni Loven. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 37, 349–370 (1958).Google Scholar
  4. Baker, H.M.: Studies on the cladocera of Monterey Bay. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. (4th Ser.) 23, 311–365 (1938).Google Scholar
  5. Banse, K.: Über das Verhalten von meroplanktischen Larven in geschichtetem Wasser. Kieler Meeresforsch. 11, 188–200 (1955).Google Scholar
  6. Barlow, J. P.: Physical and biological processes determining the distribution of zooplankton in a tidal estuary. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 109, 211–225 (1955).Google Scholar
  7. Bernard, M.: Recent advances in research on the zooplankton of the Mediterranean Sea: In. Oceanography and marine biology. An annual review, Vol. 5, pp 231–255. Ed. by H. Barnes. London; Allen & Unwin 1967.Google Scholar
  8. Bigelow, H. B.: Plankton of the offshore waters of the Gulf of Maine. Bull. Bur. Fish. Wash. 40 (Part. II), 1–508 (1924).Google Scholar
  9. Blanc, F., B. Coste, H. J. Minas et K. H. Szekielda: Distribution et correlations des prineipaux facteurs hydrobiologiques dans un milieu de forte production organique (Etang de Berre). Mar. Biol. 1, 43–55 (1967).Google Scholar
  10. Bosch, H. F. and W. Rowland Taylor: Marine cladocerans in the Chesapeake Bay estuary. Crustaceana 15, 161–164 (1968).Google Scholar
  11. Carpenter, J. H.: The Chesapeake Bay Institute technique for the Winkler dissolved oxygen method. Limnol. Oceanogr. 10, 141–143 (1965).Google Scholar
  12. Caspers, H.: Black Sea and Sea of Azov: In: Treatise on marine ecology and paleoecology, Vol. 1 pp 801–890. Ed. by J. W. Hedgpeth. New York: Geological Society of America 1957.Google Scholar
  13. Costlow, J. D., Jr., C. G. Bookout and R. Monroe: The effect of salinity and temperature on larval development of Sesarma cinereum (Bose) reared in the laboratory. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 118, 183–202 (1960).Google Scholar
  14. —: Studies of the larval development of the crab Rhithropanopeus harisii (Gould) I. The effect of salinity and temperature on larval development. Physiol. Zoöl. 39, 81–100 (1966).Google Scholar
  15. Cronin, L. E., J. C. Daiber and E. M. Hulbert: Quantitative seasonal aspects of zooplankton in the Delaware River estuary. Chesapeake Sci. 3, 63–93 (1962).Google Scholar
  16. Deevey, G. B.: A survey of the zooplankton of Block Island Sound, 1943–1946. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll. 13, 65–119 (1952).Google Scholar
  17. —: Oceanography of Long Island Sound, 1952–1954 V. Zooplankton. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll. 15, 113–155 (1956).Google Scholar
  18. —: The zooplankton of the surface waters of the Delaware Bay region. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll. 17, 5–53 (1960).Google Scholar
  19. Dolgopolskaya, M. A.: Cladocera of the Black Sea. [Russ.]. Trud y sevastopol'. biol. Sta. 10, 27–75 (1959).Google Scholar
  20. Fish, C. J.: Seasonal distribution of the plankton of the Woods Hole region. Bull. Bur. Fish., Wash. 41, 91–179 (1925).Google Scholar
  21. Gieskes, W. W. C.: The Cladocera of the North Atlantic and the North Sea: biological and ecological studies. Ph. D. Thesis, McGill University, 204 pp. 1970.Google Scholar
  22. —: Removal of “Podon” polyphemoides from the genus Podon. Hydrobiologia 38, 61–66 (1971a).Google Scholar
  23. —: Ecology of the Cladocera of the North Atlantic and the North Sea, 1960–1967. Neth. J. Sea Res. 5, 342–376 (1971b).Google Scholar
  24. Goulden, C.: The systematics and evolution of the Moinidae. Trans. Am. phil. Soc. (New Ser.) 58, 1–101 (1968).Google Scholar
  25. Jeffries, H. P.: Saturation of estuarine zooplankton by congeneric associates. In: Estuaries, pp 500–508. Ed. by G. H. Lauff. Washington: American Association for the Advancement of Science 1967.Google Scholar
  26. Jorgensen, O. M.: On the marine Cladocera from the North-umbrian plankton. J. mar. biol. Ass. U. K. 19, 177–226 (1933).Google Scholar
  27. Kinne, O.: The effects of temperature and salinity on marine and brackish water animals. II. Salinity and temperature-salinity combinations. In: Oceanography and marine biology. An annual review, Vol. 2. pp 281–330. Ed. by H. Barnes. London: Allen & Unwin 1964.Google Scholar
  28. Kikuchi, K.: A comparison of the diurnal migration of plankton in eight Japanese lakes. Mem. Coll. Sci. Kyoto Univ. (Ser. B) 5, 27–46 (1930).Google Scholar
  29. Kuttner, O.: Mitteilungen über marine Cladoceren. Sber Ges. naturf. Freunde Berl. 2, 84–93 (1911).Google Scholar
  30. Le Torneau, M.: Contribution à l'étude des cladocères du plancton du Golfe de Marseille. Recl Trav. Stn mar. Endoume 22, 123–151 (1961).Google Scholar
  31. Manuilova, E. F.: Cladocera of the fauna of the USSR. [Russ.]. Opredeliteli po faune SSSR. Trud y Akad. Nauk. SSSR 88, 1–326 (1964).Google Scholar
  32. Martin, J. H.: Phytoplankton-zooplankton relationships in Narragansett Bay. Limnol. Oceanogr. 10, 185–191 (1965).Google Scholar
  33. Mordukhai-Boltovskoi, Ph. D.: Polyphemidae of the Ponto-Caspian Basin. Hydrobiologica 25, 212–220 (1965).Google Scholar
  34. —: On the taxonomy of the Polyphemidae. Crustaceana 1968 (14), 197–209 (1968).Google Scholar
  35. Pavlova, E. V.: Food consumption and the conversion of energy by Black Sea cladoceran populations. In: Structure and dynamics of aquatic communities and populations, [Russ.]. pp 85–88. Respublikanskii Mezhvedomstvennyi Sbornik, Seriya Biologiya Morya. Akad. Nauk. USSR. Kiev: Naukova Dumska 1967.Google Scholar
  36. Pritchard, D. W. and W. V. Burt: An inexpensive and rapid technique for obtaining current profiles in estuarine waters. Tech. Rep. Chesapeake Bay Inst. 1, 1–15 (1951).Google Scholar
  37. Rupp, N. M.: Seasonal and spatial distribution of Acartia tonsa and A. clausii in Chesapeake Bay. M. A. Thesis, 46 pp. The Johns Hopkins University 1969.Google Scholar
  38. Schiemer, E. W. and D. W. Pritchard: An induction conductivity temperature indicator. Tech. Rep. Chesapeake Bay Inst. 25, 1–75 (1961).Google Scholar
  39. Sergerstråle, S. G.: Baltic Sea. In: Treatise on marine ecology and paleoecology, Vol. 1. pp 751–800. Ed. by J. W. Hedgpeth. New York: Geological Society of America 1957.Google Scholar
  40. Sherman, K.: Seasonal and areal distribution of Gulf of Maine zooplankton, 1963. Spec. Publs int. Commn NW. Atlant. Fish. 6, 611–623 (1966).Google Scholar
  41. Silliman, R. P.: A study of variability in plankton tow-net catches of Pacific pilchard (Sardinops caerulea) eggs. J. mar. Res. 6, 74–83 (1946).Google Scholar
  42. Stross, R. G.: Light and temperature requirements for diapause development and release in Daphnia. Ecology 47, 368–374 (1966).Google Scholar
  43. Sutcliffe, W. H., Jr.: A qualitative and quantitative study of the surface zooplankton at Beaufort, North Carolina. Ph. D. Thesis, 135 pp. Duke University 1950.Google Scholar
  44. Sudler, M. T.: The development of Penilia schmakeri Richard. Proc. Boston Soc. nat. Hist. 29, 109–129 (1809).Google Scholar
  45. Whaley, R. C.: A submersible sampling pump. Limnol. Oceanogr. 3, 476–477 (1958).Google Scholar
  46. Yamazi, I.: Zooplankton communities of the Navesink and Shrewsbury Rivers and Sandy Hook Bay, New Jersey. Tech. Pap. U.S. Bur. Sportfish. Wildl. 2, 1–44 (1966).Google Scholar
  47. Zenkevitch, L. A.: Caspian and Aral Seas. In: Treatise on marine ecology and paleoecology, Vol. 1. pp 891–916. Ed. by J. W. Hedgpeth. New York: Geological Society of America 1957.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. F. Bosch
    • 1
  • W. Rowland Taylor
    • 1
  1. 1.Chesapeake Bay InstituteThe Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations